CFP last date
20 May 2024
Call for Paper
June Edition
IJCA solicits high quality original research papers for the upcoming June edition of the journal. The last date of research paper submission is 20 May 2024

Submit your paper
Know more
The week's pick
Responsive image
Enhancing Privacy Preservation: Multi-Attribute Protection with P-Sensitive K-Anonymity

Twinkle Patel Kiran Amin
Random Articles
Reseach Article

Field Testing of Mobile Applications: An Effective Approach

by Naveen Singh, Ravi Shanker Yadav
journal cover thumbnail

International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 62 - Number 21
Year of Publication: 2013
Authors: Naveen Singh, Ravi Shanker Yadav
10.5120/10217-7102

Naveen Singh, Ravi Shanker Yadav . Field Testing of Mobile Applications: An Effective Approach. International Journal of Computer Applications. 62, 21 ( January 2013), 1-7. DOI=10.5120/10217-7102

@article{ 10.5120/10217-7102,
author = { Naveen Singh, Ravi Shanker Yadav },
title = { Field Testing of Mobile Applications: An Effective Approach },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { January 2013 },
volume = { 62 },
number = { 21 },
month = { January },
year = { 2013 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 1-7 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume62/number21/10217-7102/ },
doi = { 10.5120/10217-7102 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T21:12:27.369376+05:30
%A Naveen Singh
%A Ravi Shanker Yadav
%T Field Testing of Mobile Applications: An Effective Approach
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 62
%N 21
%P 1-7
%D 2013
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

Field testing of software applications developed for mobile devices is a challenge due to unique features of mobile devices. Unreliability of wireless networks, limited bandwidth, changing context, phasing network disturbance or noises problems and different data transfer time for different applications. Methodologies used in testing of desktop applications cannot be directly applicable to a mobile context. The large number of users involved in field testing along with the variety of problems reported by them increases the complexity of managing the field testing process. The contribution of this paper is to propose a generic framework, detecting noise and estimation of time for different applications to conduct field tests for mobile applications with focus on field testing, detecting network disturbance and estimation of time for different mobile applications.

References
  1. Bautsch - Vtense, H. S. , Marmet, G. J. , & Jacko, J. A. (2001). Investigating PDA web browsing through eye movement analysis. In Usability Evaluation and Interface Design: Cognitive Engineering, Intelligent Agents and Virtual Reality (pp. 6-10).
  2. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  3. Beck, E. T. , Christiansen, M. K. , & Kjeldskov, J. (2003). Experimental Evaluation of Techniques for Usability Testing of Mobile Systems in a Laboratory Setting. Proceedings of OzCHI 2003, Brisbane, Australia.
  4. Bederson, B. B. , Clamage, A. , Czerwinski, M. P. , & Robertson, G. G. (2003, April 5-10). A fisheye calendar interface for PDAs: providing overviews for small displays. Proceedings of CHI'03 extended abstracts on Human Factors in computing systems,Ft. Lauderdale, FL.
  5. -Bederson, B. B. , Czerwinski, M. P. , & Robertson, G. G. (2002). A Fisheye Calendar Interface for PDAs: Providing Overviews for Small Displays. Technical report (No. #HCIL-2002-09): University of Maryland College Park.
  6. Björk, S. , Holmquist, L. E. , Redström, J. , Bretan, I. , Danielsson, R. , Karlgren, J. , et al. (1999). WEST: a Web browser for small terminals. Proceedings of the 12th AnnualACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, Asheville, NorthCarolina.
  7. Björk, S. , Redström, J. , Ljungstrand, P. , & Holmquist, L. E. (2000). POWERVIEW: Using information links and information views to navigate and visualize informationon small displays. Proceedings of Handheld and Ubiquitous Computing 2000 (HUC2K), Bristol, U. K
  8. Brachtl, M. , Slajs, J. , & Slavik, P. (2001). PDA based navigation system for a 3Denvironment. Computers & Graphics, 25, 627-634.
  9. Buchanan, G. , Farrant, S. , Jones, M. , Thimbleby, H. , & Pazzani, M. J. (2001, May 1-5). Improving Mobile Internet Usability. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on World Wide Web, Hong Kong.
  10. Buyukkokten, O. , Garcia-Molina, H. , & Paepcke, A. (2001, May 1-5). Seeing the wholein parts: text summarization for web browsing on handheld devices. Proceedings of the tenth international conference on World Wide Web, Hong Kong.
  11. Buyukkokten, O. , Garcia-Molina, H. , Paepcke, A. , & Winograd, T. (2002). Efficient WebBrowsing on Handheld Devices Using Page and Form Summarization. ACMTransaction on Information Systems, 20(1), 82-115.
  12. Christie, J. , Klein, R. M. , & Watters, C. (2004). A comparison of simple hierarchy and grid metaphors for option layouts on small-size screens. International Journal ofHuman-Computer Studies, 60(5-6), 564-584. .
  13. Danesh, A. , Inkpen, K. , Lau, F. , Shu, K. , & Booth, K. (2001). Geney TM: Designing a Collaborative Activity for the Palm Handheld Computer. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Seattle, WA.
  14. Dey, A. K. , Salber, D. , & Abowd, G. D. (2001). A Conceptual Framework and a Toolkit for Supporting the Rapid Prototyping of Context-Aware Applications. Human-Computer Interaction, 16, 2-4.
  15. Dumas, J. S. , & Redish, J. C. (1999). A Practical Guide to Usability Testing. Intellect Book. Portland: Intellect.
  16. Ebling, M. R. , & John, B. E. (2000). On the Contributions of Different Empirical Data inUsability Testing. Proceedings of the Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods and Techniques, New York.
  17. Frokjaer, E. , Hertzum, M. , & Hornbaek, K. (2000, April 1-6). Measuring Usability: AreEffectiveness, Efficiency, and Satisfaction Really Correlated? Proceedings of theACM CHI 2000 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Hague,Netherlands.
  18. Garzotto, F. , Mainetti, L. , & Paolini, P. (1993). HDM - A Model Based Approach toHypermedia Application Design. ACM Transaction on Information Systems, 11(1), 1-26.
  19. Garzotto, F. , Mainetti, L. , & Paolini, P. (1994). Adding Multimedia Collections to theDexter Model. Proceedings of ACM Conference on Hypermedia Technology(ECHT'94), Edinburgh, UK.
  20. Dumas, J. R. , Redish J. C (1993) A Practical Guide to Usability Testing. Ablex Publishing Corporation Norwood NJ.
  21. Ericsson, K. A. , & Simon, H. A. (1980) Verbal Reports as Data. Psychological Review, 1980, 87, 215-251.
  22. Ericsson, K. A. , & Simon, H. A. (1984) Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books / MIT Press.
  23. Faulkner, L. (2003) Beyond the five-user assumption: Benefits of increased sample sizes in usability testing. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers 2003, 35 (3), 379- 383.
  24. Hertzum, M. (1999) User Testing in Industry: A case study of laboratory, Workshop and Field Tests. Proceedings of 5th ERCIM WORKSHOP ON "USER INTERFACES FOR ALL" http://ui4all. ics. forth. gr/UI4ALL-99/Hertzum. pdf
  25. Johnson, P. (1998) Usability and Mobility; Interactions on the move. In Proceedings of the First Workshop on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices, Glasgow, Scotland, GIST Technical Report G98-1.
  26. Kallio, T. , Kekäläinen A (2004) Improving the Effectiveness of Mobile Application Design: User-Pairs Testing by Non-professionals. Proceedings MobileHCI 2004Conference, Glascow,UK Springer-Verlag 2004 315-319.
  27. Kjeldskov, J. , and Graham, C. (2003) A Review of Mobile HCI Research methods. In Proceedings of the 5th International Mobile HCI 2003 Conference, Udine, Italy, Sringer-Verlag,
  28. Kjeldskov J. , Skov M. B. , Als B. S. and Høegh R. T. (2004a) Is it Worth the Hassle? Exploring the Added Value of Evaluating the Usability of Context-Aware Mobile Systems in the Field . In Proceedings MobileHCI 2004 conference, Glasgow, UK. Springer- Verlag, 2004. 61-73.
  29. Kjeldskov J. , Skov M. B. and Stage J. (2004b) Instant Data Analysis: Evaluating Usability in a Day. In Proceedings of NordiCHI 2004, Tampere, Finland. ACM, 2004. 233-240.
  30. Kopomaa, T. (2000) City in your pocket. Birth of the Mobile Information Society. Gaudeamus, Helsinki 2000.
  31. Mäkelä, A. , and Fulton Suri, J. (2001) Supporting Users' Creativity: Design to Induce Pleasurable Experiences. In M. G. Helander, H. M. Khalid, T. Ming Po (Eds. ), Proceedings of International Conference on Affective Human Factors Design. ASEAN Academic Press, 2001. 387- 394.
  32. Nielsen J. and Landauer T. K. (1993) A Mathemetical Model of Finding Usability Problems. In proceedings of INTERCHI '93. 206-213.
  33. Roto, V. Oulasvirta, A. Haikarainen, T. Lehmuskallio, H. & Nyyssönen, T. (2004) Examining mobile phone use in the wild with quasi-experimentation. HIIT Technical Report 2004-1, August 13.
  34. Tamminen, S. , Oulasvirta, A. , Toiskallio, K. , & Kankainen, A. (2004). Understanding mobile contexts. Special Issue of Journal of Personal and Ubiquitous Computing. 8, 135-143.
  35. Wichansky, A. (2000). Usability test in 2000 and beyond. Ergonomic, 43(7), 998-1006.
  36. Kim, H. , Kim, J. , Lee, Y. , Chae, M. , & Choi, Y. (2002, January 07 - 10). An Empirical Study of the Use Contexts and Usability Problems in Mobile Internet. Proceedings of the 35th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-35'02), Big Island, Hawaii.
  37. Challenges, Methodologies, and Issues in the Usability Testing of Mobile Applications, by Zhang, D et al.
  38. Visualizing the Results of Field Testing, by Brian Chan et al
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Field Testing Laboratory Usability Mobile

Powered by PhDFocusTM