CFP last date
20 May 2024
Reseach Article

A Novel LR-QPSO Algorithm for Profit Maximization of GENCOs in Deregulated Power System

by K. Asokan, R. Ashok Kumar
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 63 - Number 1
Year of Publication: 2013
Authors: K. Asokan, R. Ashok Kumar
10.5120/10430-5101

K. Asokan, R. Ashok Kumar . A Novel LR-QPSO Algorithm for Profit Maximization of GENCOs in Deregulated Power System. International Journal of Computer Applications. 63, 1 ( February 2013), 20-31. DOI=10.5120/10430-5101

@article{ 10.5120/10430-5101,
author = { K. Asokan, R. Ashok Kumar },
title = { A Novel LR-QPSO Algorithm for Profit Maximization of GENCOs in Deregulated Power System },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { February 2013 },
volume = { 63 },
number = { 1 },
month = { February },
year = { 2013 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 20-31 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume63/number1/10430-5101/ },
doi = { 10.5120/10430-5101 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T21:13:01.377321+05:30
%A K. Asokan
%A R. Ashok Kumar
%T A Novel LR-QPSO Algorithm for Profit Maximization of GENCOs in Deregulated Power System
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 63
%N 1
%P 20-31
%D 2013
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

The electric power industry need changes in various power system operation, control and planning activities. Generation companies (GENCOs) schedule their generators with an objective to maximize their own profit rather than compromising on social benefit. Power and reserve prices become important factors in decision process. GENCOs decision to commit generating units is associated with financial risks. This paper presents a hybrid model between Lagrangian Relaxation (LR) and Quantum inspired Particle Swarm Optimization (QPSO), to solve the profit-based unit commitment problem. The proposed approach is investigated on three unit and ten unit test systems and numerical results are tabulated. Simulation results shows that this approach effectively maximize the GENCO's profit when compared with existing methods.

References
  1. Mohammad Shahidehpour, H. Yamin, and Zuyili. 2002. Market Operations in Electric Power Systems Forecasting, Scheduling and Risk Management. New York: Wiley, Book.
  2. Mohammad Shahidehpour, Muwaffaq and Alomoush. 2000. Restructured electrical power systems, Operation, Trading, and volatility. New York: Wiley, Book.
  3. Mohammad Shahidehpour, Hatimyamin and salem, AIagtash. 2004. Security Constrained Optimal Generation Scheduling for GENCOs. IEEE Transactions on power systems, vol. 19, No. 3, PP. 1365-1371.
  4. Narayana Prasad Padhy. 2004. Unit Commitment—A Bibliographical Survey. IEEE Transactions on power systems, Vol. 19, No. 2, pp. 1196- 1205.
  5. Narayana Prasad Padhy. 2003. Unit commitment problem under deregulated environment- a review. Power Engineering Society General Meeting, Vol 2, PP. 1088-1094,
  6. Wood A. J. and Woolenberg B. F. 1996. Power generation, operation and control. New York, NY: John Wiley Sons; Book.
  7. Walter Snyder L, David Powell H. and John Rayburn C. 1987 Dynamic programming approach tounit commitment. IEEE Transactions on Power System, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 339-348.
  8. Cohen A. I. and Yoshimura M. 1983 A branch and bound algorithm for unit commitment. IEEE Transaction on Power Apparatus System, Vol. 102, No. 2, pp. 444-451.
  9. Dillon T. S, Edwin K. W, Taud R. and Kochs H. D 1978. Integer programming approach to the problem of optimal unit commitment with probabilistic reserve Determination" IEEE Transaction on Power Apparatus System, Vol. 97, No. 6, pp. 2156-2166.
  10. Arroyo M. C. and Jose M. 2006. A computationally efficient mixed-integer linear formulation for the thermal unit commitment problem. IEEE Transactions on Power System, Vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 1371-348.
  11. Sudhir V. , Adrian E. C. , Imhof K. and Shishir M. 1989. Implementation of a Lagrangian based unit commitment problem. IEEE Transactions on Power System, Vol. 4, No. 4, pp. 1373-1380.
  12. Arroyo J. M. and Conejo A. J. 2002. A parallel repair genetic algorithm to solve the unit commitment problem. IEEE Transactions on Power System, Vol. 17, No. 4, pp. 1216-1224.
  13. C. W. Richter, Jr. and G. B. Sheble, 2000. A profit-based unit commitment for the competitive environment. IEEE Transactions on Power System, vol. 15, pp. 715–721.
  14. Dionisios K. Dimitroulas, Pavlos S. Georgilakis. 2011. A new memetic algorithm approach for the price based unit commitment problem. Applied Energy, Vol 88, Issue 12, pp 4687-4699.
  15. C. Christopher Columbus, K. Chandrasekaran, Sishaj P. Simon. 2012. Nodal ant colony optimization for solving profit based unit commitment problem for GENCOs. Applied soft computing, Vol. 12, PP. 145-160.
  16. Jacob Raglend , C. Raghuveer, G. Rakesh Avinash, N. P. Padhy , D. P. Kothari . 2010. Solution to profit based unit commitment problem using particle swarm optimization. Applied Soft Computing Vol 10, Issue 4, pp. 1247–1256.
  17. C. Christopher Columbus and Sishaj P Simon. 2011. Profit based unit commitment for GENCOs using parallel PSO in a distributed cluster. ACEEE Int. J. on Electrical and Power Engineering, Vol. 02, No. 03.
  18. K. Chandram, N. Subrahmanyam, Member, IEEE, M. Sydulu. 2008. New approach with Muller method for solving Profit Based Unit Commitment. DRPT2008 6-9 April 2008 Nanjing hina,952-957
  19. K. Chandram, N. Subrahmanyam and M. Sydulu. 2009. Improved Pre-prepared Power Demand Table and Muller's Method to Solve the Profit Based Unit Commitment Problem. Journal of Electrical Engineering & Technology Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 159-167.
  20. Tao Li, Member, IEEE, and Mohammad Shahidehpour, Fellow, IEEE. 2005. Price-Based Unit Commitment: A Case of Lagrangian Relaxation versus Mixed Integer Programming. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 20, no. 4, 2015-2025.
  21. Cheng C. P. , Liu C. W. and Liu C. C. 2000. Unit commitment by Lagrangian relaxation and genetic algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Power System, Vol. 15, No. 2, pp. 707-714.
  22. H. Y. Yamin,Q. El-Dawirin,S. M. Shahidehpour. 2007. A new approach for GenCos Profit based unit commitment in day-ahead competitive electricity markets considering reserve uncertainty. Electrical power and energy systems, Vol. 29, PP. 609-616.
  23. Pathom attaviriyanupap, Hiroyuki kita,Jun Hasegawa. 2003. A Hybrid LR-EP for Solving New Profit-Based UC Problem under Competitive Environment. IEEE Transactions on power systems, Vol. 18, No. 1, PP. 229-237.
  24. Zhang, Zhisheng. 2010. Quantum-behaved particle swarm optimization algorithm for economic load dispatch of power system. Expert system with application, Vol. 37, PP. 1800 -1803.
  25. Chegfu Sun, Songfeng Lu. 2010. Short-term combined economic hydrothermal scheduling using improved quantum-behaved particle swarm optimization. Expert system with applications, Vol. 37, PP. 4232-4241.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Electricity markets Generation company (GENCO) Independent system operator (ISO) profit based unit commitment (PBUC) profit maximization LR-QPSO method