CFP last date
20 May 2024
Call for Paper
June Edition
IJCA solicits high quality original research papers for the upcoming June edition of the journal. The last date of research paper submission is 20 May 2024

Submit your paper
Know more
The week's pick
Responsive image
Enhancing Privacy Preservation: Multi-Attribute Protection with P-Sensitive K-Anonymity

Twinkle Patel Kiran Amin
Random Articles
Reseach Article

Comparative Analysis on Scene Image Classification using Selected Hybrid Features

by Madhu Bala Myneni, M. Seetha
journal cover thumbnail

International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 63 - Number 2
Year of Publication: 2013
Authors: Madhu Bala Myneni, M. Seetha
10.5120/10442-5130

Madhu Bala Myneni, M. Seetha . Comparative Analysis on Scene Image Classification using Selected Hybrid Features. International Journal of Computer Applications. 63, 2 ( February 2013), 44-47. DOI=10.5120/10442-5130

@article{ 10.5120/10442-5130,
author = { Madhu Bala Myneni, M. Seetha },
title = { Comparative Analysis on Scene Image Classification using Selected Hybrid Features },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { February 2013 },
volume = { 63 },
number = { 2 },
month = { February },
year = { 2013 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 44-47 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume63/number2/10442-5130/ },
doi = { 10.5120/10442-5130 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T21:15:12.070768+05:30
%A Madhu Bala Myneni
%A M. Seetha
%T Comparative Analysis on Scene Image Classification using Selected Hybrid Features
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 63
%N 2
%P 44-47
%D 2013
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

A comparative analysis on image classification is accomplished on scene image feature set by using various existing classifiers. The classification is performed on conventional feature set, hybrid feature set and selected hybrid feature set for classifying the war tanks from the natural scene images. The features are extracted in three ways; conventional feature extraction methods like gray level co-occurrence matrices features & statistical moment's features; hybrid feature extraction is the combination of color mean, GLCM properties and canny edge count; the proposed selected hybrid feature set. The extracted features are trained and tested with various classifiers like Artificial Neural Network (ANN) using feed forward back propagation algorithm, Support Vector Machines (SVM) using polynomial kernel with p=1, Bayes Net classifier using genetic search and J4. 8 decision tree. The results show that classification efficiency of the selected hybrid feature extraction methods (i. e. , the combination of GLCM & edge count) surpasses the conventional feature extraction methods in war scene classification problems.

References
  1. Andrew Payne and Sameer Singh. 2005. Indoor vs outdoor scene classification in digital photographs, Pattern Recognition , pp. 1533-1545.
  2. Arivazhagan S, Ganesan L. 2003. Texture Segmentation Using Wavelet Transform. Pattern Recognition Letters, pp. 3197– 3203.
  3. Bosch A, Munoz X and Freixenet J. 2007. Segmentation and description of natural outdoor scenes, Image and Vision computing 25 , pp. 727-740.
  4. Bosch A, Zisserman A. 2008. Scene classification using a hybrid generative/discriminative approach, IEEE Trans. on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 712–727.
  5. Brazokovic D and Nescovic M. 1993. Mammogram screening using multisolution based image segmentation, International journal of pattern recognition and Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 7,No. 6, pp. 1437-1460.
  6. Chang T, Kuo C,1993. Texture Analysis and classification with tree structured wavelet transform, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, Vol. 2, No. 4, P. 429-441.
  7. Chella A,Frixione M and Gaglio S. 2000. Understanding dynamic scenes, Artificial Intelligence 123, pp. 89-132.
  8. Christiyanni I. et al . , 2000. Fast detection of masses in computer aided mammography, IEEE Signal processing Magazine, pp. 54- 64.
  9. Daniel Madan Raja S. , Shanmugam A. 2011. ANN and SVM Based War Scene Classification using Wavelet Features: A Comparative Study, Journal of Computational Information Systems, Vol 7, No. 5, pp 1402- 1411.
  10. Dr. H. B. Kekre, Sudeep D. Thepade, Tanuja K. Sarode and Vashali Suryawanshi. 2010. Image Retrieval using Texture Features extracted from GLCM, LBG and KPE, Vol. 2, No. 5, pp. 1793-8201.
  11. Dunn C. , Higgins W. E. 1995. Optimal Gabor filters for texture segmentation, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, Vol. 4, No. 7, pp. 947-964.
  12. El-sayed a. El-dahshan, Abdel-badeeh and Tamer H. Younis. 2009. A Hybrid Technique for Automatic MRI brain Images Classification, Studia Univ. Babes_Bolyai, Informatica, Vol. LIV, No. 1, pp. 55-66.
  13. Free borough P. A. , Fox N. C. 1998. MR image texture analysis applied to the diagnosis and tracking of Alzheimer's disease, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, Vol. 17, No. 3,pp. 475-479.
  14. Gokalp D. , Aksoy S, 2007. Scene Classification Using Bag-of-Regions Representations, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, CVPR, IEEE Conference on, pp. 1-8.
  15. James Z. Wang, Gio Wiederhold, Oscar Firschein, Sha X. Wei,, 1997. Content-Based Image Indexing and Searching Using Daubechies Wavelets, Int. J. on Digital Libraries , Vol. 1, No. 4. pp. 311-328.
  16. Jing Peng, Douglas R. Heisterkamp & H. K. Dai, 2003. LDA/SVM Driven Nearest Neighbor Classification, IEEE transaction on Neural Networks, pp. 940-942,.
  17. Kavzoglu T and Mather P. M. , 2002. The role of feature selection in artificial neural network applications, International Journal of Remote Sensing, Vol. 23, No. 15, P. 2919-2937.
  18. Lei Zhang, Mingjing Li, Hong-Jiang Zhang, 2002. Boosting Image Orientation Detection with Indoor vs. Outdoor Classification, Proceedings of the Sixth IEEE Workshop on Applications of Computer Vision, December 03-04, pp. 95.
  19. Ping Yao, 2009. Fuzzy Rough Set and Information Entropy Based Feature Selection for credit Scoring, IEEE , pp. 247-251.
  20. Pradipta Maji and Sankar K. Pal,2010. Fuzzy–Rough Sets for Information Measures and Selection of Relevant Genes From Microarray Data, IEEE,Vol. 40, No. 3, P. 741-752.
  21. Rohlfing T et al. ,2004. Performance-Based Multi-Classifier Decision Fusion for ATLAS-Based Segmentation of Biomedical Images, IEEE International Symposium, Vol. 1, pp404- 407.
  22. S. Lai,X. Li and W. Bischof . 1989. on techniques for detecting circumscribed masses in mammograms, IEEE Trans on Medical Imaging, Vol. 8, No. 4, pp. 377-386.
  23. Schad L. R. , Bluml S. , Zuna, I. 1993. MR tissue characterization of intracranial tumors by means of texture analysis, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Vol. 11, No. 6, pp. 889-896.
  24. Serkawt Khola, 2011. Feature Weighting and Selection A Novel Genetic Evolutionary Approach, World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology 73, pp. 1007-1012. .
  25. Topouzelis K. ,, Stathakis D. and Karathanassi V. , 2009. Investigation of genetic algorithms contribution to feature selection for oil spill detection, Vol. 30, No. 3, pp. 611-625,.
  26. Trivedi M. M. ,Haralick, R. W. Conners, and Goh S. , 1984. Object Detection based on Gray Level Coocurrence, Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing, Vol. 28, pp. 199-219.
  27. Vailaya A. et al. , 2001. Image classification for content-based indexing, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 10, pp. 117–129
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Hybrid features selected hybrid features classification algorithms

Powered by PhDFocusTM