CFP last date
20 May 2024
Reseach Article

Resource Consumption Framework for Fault Diagnosis in Cloud

by Chitra. B, Selvi. S, T. Rajendran
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 63 - Number 20
Year of Publication: 2013
Authors: Chitra. B, Selvi. S, T. Rajendran
10.5120/10583-5702

Chitra. B, Selvi. S, T. Rajendran . Resource Consumption Framework for Fault Diagnosis in Cloud. International Journal of Computer Applications. 63, 20 ( February 2013), 24-28. DOI=10.5120/10583-5702

@article{ 10.5120/10583-5702,
author = { Chitra. B, Selvi. S, T. Rajendran },
title = { Resource Consumption Framework for Fault Diagnosis in Cloud },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { February 2013 },
volume = { 63 },
number = { 20 },
month = { February },
year = { 2013 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 24-28 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume63/number20/10583-5702/ },
doi = { 10.5120/10583-5702 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T21:14:52.938711+05:30
%A Chitra. B
%A Selvi. S
%A T. Rajendran
%T Resource Consumption Framework for Fault Diagnosis in Cloud
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 63
%N 20
%P 24-28
%D 2013
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

In the heterogeneous parallel and distributed computing environments like cloud there were many related approaches proposed for fault tolerant execution of workflows. Most of the earlier works involved does not depend on failure prediction of the resources that is really hard to achieve with the tracing of historic failure data over years of the desired environment. In this paper, to solve the software fault prediction, unavailability of the resources and monitoring problems we propose a failure prediction model that involves two different methods. In order to predict the failures at the nodes we propose a method using Intelligent Platform Management Interface (IPMI), that monitor the failure at nodes and provide the respective data that is useful for determining likely imminent failures. The other method is to predict the Unavailability of the resources from past behavior that generates some initial results that indicate that nodes are different from one another and their failure is somewhat predictable and monitoring is performed which intimates about the failure.

References
  1. J. Yu,T. Buyya and chen Khong Tham, "Qos- Based Scheduling of Workflow Application on Service Grids," Proc. IEEE First Int'l Conference e-Science GridComputing (eScience'05),Jan. 2005
  2. S. Ostermann, R. Prodan, T. Fahringer, A. Iosup, and D. Epema, "A Trace-Based Investigation of the Characteristics of Grid Workflows," From Grids to Service and Pervasive Computing, pp. 191-203, Springer, http://www. springerlink. com/content/x21m42878m456338/fulltext. pdf, Aug. 2008
  3. L. Guo, A. McGough,A. Akram,D. Colling, and J. Martyniak, "Qos for Service Based Workflow on Grid," Proc. Conf. UK e-Science 2007 All Hands Meeting, January 2007.
  4. M. Wieczorek, M. Siddiqui, A. Villazon, R. Prodan, and T. Fahringer, "Applying Advance Reservation to Increase Predictability of Workflow Execution on the Grid," Proc. IEEE Second Int'l Conf. e-Science and Grid Computing (E-SCIENCE '06), 2006.
  5. K. Plankensteiner, R. Prodan, T. Fahringer, A. Kertesz, and P. Kacsuk, "Fault-Tolerant Behavior in State-of-the-Art Grid Worklow Management Systems," Technical Report TR-0091, Inst. On Grid Information, Resource and Worklow Monitoring Services,CoreGRID—Network of Excellence, Oct. 2007.
  6. Y. Zhang, D. Wong, and W. Zheng, "User-level Checkpoint and Recovery for LAM/MPI," SIGOPS Oper. Syst. Rev. , vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 72–81, 2005.
  7. J. Yu and R. Buyya, "A Taxonomy of Scientific Workflow Systems for Grid Computing," ACM SIGMOD Record, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 44- 49, 2005
  8. Seoko Son and Kwang Mong Sim ,"A price and time slot Negotiation mechanism for Cloud Service Reservations" in IEEE Transactions on Systems,Man, Cybernetics, June 2012
  9. K. M. Sim and B. Shi, "Concurrent negotiation and coordination for Grid resource coallocation" IEEE Trans. Syst. ,Man,Cybern. B,Cybern. ,vol. 40,no. 3, pp. 753-766,May2010
  10. G. Kandaswamy, A. Mandal, and D. A. Reed, "Fault Tolerance and Recovery of Scientific Workflows on Computational Grids," Proc. IEEE Eighth Int'l Symp. Cluster Computing and the Grid (CGDRID '08), pp. 777-782, 2008.
  11. Bernd Grobauer, Siemens CERT Tobias Walloschek, Siemens IT Solutions and Services Elmar Stöcker, Siemens IT Solutions and Services, "Understanding cloud computing vulnerabilities", IEEE Security and Privacy.
  12. Tharam Dillon, Chen Wu and Elizabeth Chang, "Cloud Computing: Issues and Challenges", 2010 24th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Failure prediction IPMI Checkpoint Task Replication