CFP last date
20 May 2024
Call for Paper
June Edition
IJCA solicits high quality original research papers for the upcoming June edition of the journal. The last date of research paper submission is 20 May 2024

Submit your paper
Know more
The week's pick
Responsive image
Enhancing Privacy Preservation: Multi-Attribute Protection with P-Sensitive K-Anonymity

Twinkle Patel Kiran Amin
Random Articles
Reseach Article

Applying Logical Scoring Preference Method for Semantic Web Service Selection

by S. Maheswari, G. R. Karpagam
journal cover thumbnail

International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 65 - Number 19
Year of Publication: 2013
Authors: S. Maheswari, G. R. Karpagam
10.5120/11035-6259

S. Maheswari, G. R. Karpagam . Applying Logical Scoring Preference Method for Semantic Web Service Selection. International Journal of Computer Applications. 65, 19 ( March 2013), 38-46. DOI=10.5120/11035-6259

@article{ 10.5120/11035-6259,
author = { S. Maheswari, G. R. Karpagam },
title = { Applying Logical Scoring Preference Method for Semantic Web Service Selection },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { March 2013 },
volume = { 65 },
number = { 19 },
month = { March },
year = { 2013 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 38-46 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume65/number19/11035-6259/ },
doi = { 10.5120/11035-6259 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T21:19:18.509202+05:30
%A S. Maheswari
%A G. R. Karpagam
%T Applying Logical Scoring Preference Method for Semantic Web Service Selection
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 65
%N 19
%P 38-46
%D 2013
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

In today's scenario web services have become a magnificent paradigm as the Web is moving towards a collection of services that interoperate through the Internet. Pooled with Semantic Web technologies, Web Services can be definitely interpreted and selected based on the consumers' requirements. In this paper an attempt has been made to apply LSP (Logic Scoring Preference) method with OWA (Ordered Weighted Averaging) Operators for semantic web service selection. The proposed model consists of three components namely service repository, OWL-Converter and Multi service agent. Service repository maintains both functional and nonfunctional service profiles. Owl-converter helps in converting WSDL into Owl-S format. Multi service agent consists of two sub systems namely functional agent and QoS agent. Functional agent helps in discovery of relevant services where as QoS agent helps in ranking the discovered services based on QoS factors. The performance evaluation of the proposed framework is illustrated using online book purchase scenario.

References
  1. Bhuvaneswari. A,Dr. karpagam. G. R, Discovering Substitutable and Composable Semantic Web Services for Web Service Composition, International Journal of Computer Applications (0975 – 888) Volume 48– No. 8, June 2012.
  2. Al-Masri. E and Q. H. Mahmoud. Q. H. Discovering the Best Web Service. In Proceedings ofthe 16th International Conference on World Wide Web, Banff, AB ; pp. 1257 – 1258, 2007.
  3. Al?Masri E. and Mahmoud . Q. QoS?based discovery and ranking of web service. In Computer Communications and Networks. Proceedings of 16th International Conference on; 2007, pp. 529?534.
  4. OASIS. Web Services Quality Description Language v1. 0;2008
  5. Hong Qing. Yu, Stephan Reiff-Marganiec. A Method for Automated Web Service Selection. Internatinal Journal On Web Service Selection ;IST- 2006-034718,2007.
  6. Hong Qing Yu1 and Hernán Molina2,A modified Logic Scoring Preference method for dynamic Web services evaluation and selection.
  7. Robert F. OWA operators in Decision Making, Carlsson ed. , Exploring the limits of Support Systems, TUCS General Publications No. 3, Turku Centre for Computer Science;1996, pp. 85-104.
  8. owl. cs. manchester. ac. uk/tutorials/protegeowltutorial/ Precondition and effect matching using swrl - Volkan Özadal? B. S. protege. stanford. edu/plugins/owl.
  9. Umesh Bellur1, Harin Vadodaria2 and Amit Gupta. Semantic Matchmaking Algorithm;2008.
  10. www. membrane-soa. org/soa-registry-doc/installation/jboss. htm
  11. Zhou C. , Chia L. T. and Lee B. S. QoS measurement issues with DAML?QoS ontology. IEEE International Conference on e?Business Engineering (ICEBE); 2005.
  12. Xu Z. , Martin P. , Powley W. and Zulkernine F. Reputation?enhanced qos?based web services discovery. IEEE International Conference on Web Services; ICWS 2007, 2007, pp. 249?256
  13. Wang. P. QoS?aware web services selection with intuitionistic fuzzy set under consumer's vague perception. Expert Syst. Appl;vol. 36, pp. 4460?4466, 2009.
  14. Maheswari. s,Dr. Karpagam. G. R. QoS based efficient web service selection. European Journal of Scientific Research; ISSN 1450-216X Vol. 66 No. 3 (2011), pp. 428-440.
  15. Menasce, D. A. QoS Issues in Web Services. IEEE Internet Computing, 6(6); pp. 72-75, 2002.
  16. Mou, Y. , Cao, J. , Zhang, S. S. and Zhang, J. H. Interactive Web Service Choice-MakingBased onExtended QoS Model; CIT (2005), pp. 1130-1134.
  17. Umesh Bellur, Roshan Kulkarni Improved Matchmaking Algorithm for Semantic Web Service Based on Bipartite Graph Matching, 2007
  18. JENA: Java framework for building semantic web applications. http://jena. sourceforge. net.
  19. R. Manoharan, A. Archana and Siddhika Nitin Cowlagi Hybrid Web Services Ranking Algorithm IJCSI International Journal of Computer Science Issues, Vol. 8, Issue 3, No. 2, May 2011
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Semantic web service OWL-S Semantic description Multi agent systems QoS LSP

Powered by PhDFocusTM