CFP last date
20 May 2024
Call for Paper
June Edition
IJCA solicits high quality original research papers for the upcoming June edition of the journal. The last date of research paper submission is 20 May 2024

Submit your paper
Know more
The week's pick
Responsive image
Enhancing Privacy Preservation: Multi-Attribute Protection with P-Sensitive K-Anonymity

Twinkle Patel Kiran Amin
Random Articles
Reseach Article

WSN Performance Parameters of AODV, DYMO, OLSR and IERP in RWP Mobility Model through Qualnet

by Ashish Allen Roberts, Rajeev Paulus, A. K. Jaiswal
journal cover thumbnail

International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 65 - Number 22
Year of Publication: 2013
Authors: Ashish Allen Roberts, Rajeev Paulus, A. K. Jaiswal
10.5120/11218-6419

Ashish Allen Roberts, Rajeev Paulus, A. K. Jaiswal . WSN Performance Parameters of AODV, DYMO, OLSR and IERP in RWP Mobility Model through Qualnet. International Journal of Computer Applications. 65, 22 ( March 2013), 28-32. DOI=10.5120/11218-6419

@article{ 10.5120/11218-6419,
author = { Ashish Allen Roberts, Rajeev Paulus, A. K. Jaiswal },
title = { WSN Performance Parameters of AODV, DYMO, OLSR and IERP in RWP Mobility Model through Qualnet },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { March 2013 },
volume = { 65 },
number = { 22 },
month = { March },
year = { 2013 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 28-32 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume65/number22/11218-6419/ },
doi = { 10.5120/11218-6419 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T21:20:57.499311+05:30
%A Ashish Allen Roberts
%A Rajeev Paulus
%A A. K. Jaiswal
%T WSN Performance Parameters of AODV, DYMO, OLSR and IERP in RWP Mobility Model through Qualnet
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 65
%N 22
%P 28-32
%D 2013
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

Wireless Sensors are devices that monitor and record their surroundings physical and environmental parameters and transmit them continuously to one of the source sensors. A collection of such wireless sensors form a network called Wireless Sensor Networks. This technology is considered to be the best for the study of performance parameters. Routing is a technique which we use to select path to send traffic in the network, also called as Protocol. AODV, DYMO [6], OLSR and IERP[5] are adhoc routing protocols. In this paper we shall study different performance parameters in a Random Waypoint Mobility Model by varying the number of nodes and also changing the maximum speed of a node, such as Average Throughput, Average End to End Delay, Average Jitter, Average PDR (Packet Delivery Ratio) and Total Packets Received. Analysis and performance study is done using Qualnet 6. 0 simulator.

References
  1. V. Thapar, B. Jain, V. Sahni "Routing protocols using random waypoint mobility model in wireless sensor networks" International Journal on Computer Science and Engineering (ISSN:0975-3397) Vol. 3 No. 8 August 2011 page 3059.
  2. S. Mittal, P. Kaur, "Performance Comparison of AODV, DSR and ZRP Routing Protocols in MANET's", 09 International Conference on Advances in Computing, Control and Telecommunication Technologies. IEEE 2009.
  3. A. Goyal, S. Vijay, D. K. Jhariya "Simulation and Performance Analysis of Routing Protocols in Wireless Sensor Network using Qualnet" International Journal of Computer Application (0975-8887)Volume 52-No. 2, August 2012
  4. N. Bisht, R. Mishra, R. Dhillon "Mobility Based Performance Analysis of Wireless Sensor Networks", International Journal of Computer, Electronics & Electrical Engineering (ISSN: 2249-9997) Volume 2-Issue 2.
  5. Haas, Zygmunt J. , Pearlman, Marc R. , Samar, P. Interzone Routing Protocol (IERP), June 2001, IETF Internet Draft, draft- ietf-manet-ierp-01. txt.
  6. Ian D. Chakeres and Charles E. Perkins. Dynamic MANET on demand (DYMO) routing protocol. Internet-Draft Version 06, IETF, October 2006.
  7. Parma Nand, Dr. S. C. Sharma," Routing Load Analysis of Broadcast based Reactive Routing Protocols AODV, DSR and DYMO for MANET" International journal of grid and distributed computing vol. 4, No. 1, PP 81-92, March 2011.
  8. M. Amin, M. Abrar, Z. Khan, Abdusalam, S. Rizwan, "Comparison of OLSR & DYMO Routing Protocols on the Basis of Different Performance Metrics in Mobile Ad-hoc Networks. ", American Journal of Scientific Research, ISSN 1450-223X, Issue 37(2011),pp. 34-57.
  9. A review of current routing protocols for Ad- hoc mobile wireless networks by Elizabeth M. Royer, department of electrical and Computer Engg. ,California and C. K. Toh, IEEE Personal Communications April 1999, Vol 6, issue 2, pp 46- 55.
  10. Performance comparison of MANET routing Protocols in different network sizes by David Oliver Jorg, institute of computer Science and appliedmathematics computer Networks and distributed systems University of Berne, Switzerland IAM RVS February 2004 computer science projects.
  11. B. Ahmed, M. Islam, J. Rahman, "Simmulation, Analysis and Performance Comparison among different Routing Protocols for Wireless Sensor Networks", Computer Engineering and Intelligent Systems , ISSN 2222-1719, Vol 2, No. 4, 2011.
  12. Discovering Variables that Affect MANET Protocol Performance KurkowskiS. Navidi,W. Camp,T. Air Force Inst. of Technol. , Wright Patterson AFB; Global Telecommunications Conference, 2007. GLOBECOM '07. IEEE Publication Date: 26-30 Nov. 2007
  13. S. Mittal, P. Kaur, "PERFORMANCE COMPARISON OF AODV, DSR, AND ZRP ROUTING PROTOCOLS IN MANNET'S", 09 International Conference on Advances in Computing, Control, and Telecommunication Technologies, 978-0-7695-3915-7/09 $26. 00 © 2009 IEEE DOI 10. 1109/ACT. 2009. 50
  14. Zygmunt J. Haas, Marc R. Pearlman, Prince Samar, Cornell University, The Interzone Routing Protocol (IERP) for Ad Hoc Networks, draft-ietf-manet-zone-ierp-01. txt
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Mobility Models AODV DYMO OLSR IERP Qualnet 6. 0 Jitter End to end delay PDR Throughput

Powered by PhDFocusTM