CFP last date
22 April 2024
Reseach Article

Performance Analysis of AODV, DSR and DYMO Protocols using Random Waypoint Mobility Model in MANET

by Shobha Arya, Nipur, Chandrakala Arya
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 67 - Number 19
Year of Publication: 2013
Authors: Shobha Arya, Nipur, Chandrakala Arya
10.5120/11502-7219

Shobha Arya, Nipur, Chandrakala Arya . Performance Analysis of AODV, DSR and DYMO Protocols using Random Waypoint Mobility Model in MANET. International Journal of Computer Applications. 67, 19 ( April 2013), 13-17. DOI=10.5120/11502-7219

@article{ 10.5120/11502-7219,
author = { Shobha Arya, Nipur, Chandrakala Arya },
title = { Performance Analysis of AODV, DSR and DYMO Protocols using Random Waypoint Mobility Model in MANET },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { April 2013 },
volume = { 67 },
number = { 19 },
month = { April },
year = { 2013 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 13-17 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume67/number19/11502-7219/ },
doi = { 10.5120/11502-7219 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T21:25:51.808656+05:30
%A Shobha Arya
%A Nipur
%A Chandrakala Arya
%T Performance Analysis of AODV, DSR and DYMO Protocols using Random Waypoint Mobility Model in MANET
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 67
%N 19
%P 13-17
%D 2013
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

The Mobile Ad Hoc Network is an infrastructure less, multi-hop ad hoc network because the intermediate nodes are used to transmit data from source to destination. This paper represents the simulation based study of network protocols for varying network load and mobility. In this paper three protocols AODV, DSR and DYMO are compared by using random waypoint mobility in few nodes with varying packet sizes in CBR traffic. Different parameters or metrics are used to evaluate the performance of protocols, which are data throughput, end-to-end delay and packet loss with varying data traffic CBR(Constant Bit Ratio) load over UDP using QualNet 5. 0. 2 simulator.

References
  1. Vivek Thaper, Bindyia Jain and Varsha Sahni. August 2011. Performance Analysis of Ad Hoc Routing Protocols Using Random Waypoint Mobility Model in Wireless Sensor Networks. IJCSE.
  2. MIAO Quan-xing, XU Lei. 2010. DYMO routing protocol Research and Simulation based on NS2. International conference on computer application and system modelling (ICCASM 2010),pp. v14-41 –v14-44.
  3. C. K. Toh. 2002:55-77. Ad hoc Mobile Wireless Networks: Protocols and Systems. Prentice Hall PTR.
  4. Mbarushimana C. , Shahrabi A. , "Comparative Mbarushimana C. , Shahrabi A. 2007. Comparative Study of Reactive and Proactive Routing Protocols Performance in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks. 21st International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications Workshops, Vol. 2, Pages: 679-684.
  5. Pirzada, A. A. , Portmann, M. , Indulska, J. 2006. Performance Comparison of Multi-Path AODV and DSR protocols in Hybrid Mesh Networks. 14th IEEE International Conference on Networks, vol. 02, Pages: 1-6.
  6. Bai, Fan; Helmy, Ahmed. 2006. A Survey of Mobility Models in Wireless Ad hoc Networks. (Chapter 1 in Wireless Ad-Hoc Networks. Kluwer Academic. 2006).
  7. N. S. Yadav, and R. P. Yadav. 2007. Performance Comparison and Analysis of Table- Driven and On-Demand Routing Protocols for Mobile Ad-hoc Networks. International Journal of Information Technology, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp 101-109.
  8. A. A. Pirzada, C. McDonald, and A. Datta. 2006. Performance Comparison of Trust-Based Reactive Routing Protocols. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing Vol. 5 No. 6 pp. 695-710.
  9. Elizabeth Belding, Royer, "Routing approaches in mobile ad hoc networks", in: S. Basagni, M. Conti, S. Giordano, I. Stojemenvoic (Eds), AdHoc Networking, IEEE Press Wiley, New York, 2003.
  10. S. Y. Ni, Y. C. Tseng, Y. S. Chen, J. P. Sheu. August 1999. The broadcast storm problem in a mobile ad hoc network, in: Proceedings of the 1999 Fifth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking, IEEE Computer Society, New York, pp. 151–162.
  11. QiZhang, Dharma P. Agrawal. February 2005. Dynamic probabilistic broadcasting in MANETs. Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing 65(2), pp 220-233.
  12. B. Williams, T. Camp. 2002. Comparison of broadcasting techniques for mobile ad hoc networks, in: Proceedings of the ACM International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking and Computing (MOBIHOC 2002), pp. 194–205.
  13. Perkins C, Bhagwat P. October1994. Highly Dynamic Destination-Sequenced Distance-Vector Routing (DSDV) Routing. SIGCOMM' 94 Computer Communication Review, vol24, no. 4, p234-244.
  14. Charles Perkins, Elizabeth Royer and Samir Das. July 2003. Ad hoc one demand distance vector (AODV) routing. IETF RFC No. 3561.
  15. Josh Broch, David Johnson and David Maltz. Feb 2007. The dynamic source routing protocol for mobile adhoc networks for IPv4. IETF RFC 4728.
  16. D. Johnsonand, D. Maltz. 1996. Dynamic source routing in ad hoc wireless networks. In T. Imielinski and H. Korth, editors, Mobile computing, chapter5. Kluwer Academic.
  17. Ian D. Chakeresand Charles E. Perkins. October 2006. Dynamic MANET on demand (DYMO) routing protocol. Internet-Draft Version 06, IETF.
  18. V. Park, and S. Corson. July 2001. Temporally-Ordered Routing Algorithm (TORA). Version 1 Functional Specification, draft-ietf-manet-tora-spec-04. txt.
  19. Zygmunt J. Haas, Marc R. Pearlman and Prince Samar. July, 2002. The Zone Routing Protocol (ZRP) for Ad Hoc Networks. Draft-ietf-manet-zone-zrp-04. txt.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

MANET AODV DSR DYMO CBR and Random waypoint mobility model