CFP last date
20 May 2024
Reseach Article

Impact of Mobility on Different Routing Approaches in MANETs

by Hrudya K. P., Prabhakar Gupta, Brajesh Kumar
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 67 - Number 23
Year of Publication: 2013
Authors: Hrudya K. P., Prabhakar Gupta, Brajesh Kumar
10.5120/11535-7296

Hrudya K. P., Prabhakar Gupta, Brajesh Kumar . Impact of Mobility on Different Routing Approaches in MANETs. International Journal of Computer Applications. 67, 23 ( April 2013), 18-22. DOI=10.5120/11535-7296

@article{ 10.5120/11535-7296,
author = { Hrudya K. P., Prabhakar Gupta, Brajesh Kumar },
title = { Impact of Mobility on Different Routing Approaches in MANETs },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { April 2013 },
volume = { 67 },
number = { 23 },
month = { April },
year = { 2013 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 18-22 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume67/number23/11535-7296/ },
doi = { 10.5120/11535-7296 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T21:26:14.200248+05:30
%A Hrudya K. P.
%A Prabhakar Gupta
%A Brajesh Kumar
%T Impact of Mobility on Different Routing Approaches in MANETs
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 67
%N 23
%P 18-22
%D 2013
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

In mobile ad hoc networks, the movement of the mobile nodes is one of the important characteristics because it can affect the performance of the routing protocol. The mobility pattern directly influences when communication links between nodes are established or broken, which is associated with the network topology. In this paper, the impact of the different mobility models on the performance of different routing approaches has been studied. AODV, DSR, LAR, and OLSR are taken as the candidate protocols for this purpose. The performance of these protocols is evaluated and analyzed for different mobility models like RWP, RPGM, GM and MH through simulation. The performance metrics like packet delivery ratio, average end-to-end delay, normalized routing load, and throughput are evaluated for these protocols using network simulator NS2 under different scenarios.

References
  1. S. Sesay et al. , "Simulation Comparison of Four Wireless Ad Hoc Routing Protocols",Information Technology Journal 3(3), 2004, pp:219-226.
  2. S. Shah et al, "Performance Evaluation of Ad Hoc Routing Protocols Using NS2 Simulation",Conf. of Mobile and Pervasive Computing, 2008
  3. G. Jayakumar, G. Gopinath, "Performance Comparison of MANET Protocol Based on Manhattan Grid Model", Journal of Mobile Communications, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 18-26, 2008.
  4. M. K. Jeya Kumar, R. S. Rajesh, "A Survey of MANET Routing Protocols in MobilityModels", Int. Journal of Soft Computing 4(3),2009, pp. 136-141
  5. Sham-ul-Arfeen et al, "Performance Evaluation of MANET Routing Protocols Using Scenario Based Mobility Models", Innovative Algorithms and Techniques in Automation, Industrial Electronics and Telecommunications, Springer,2007. pp. 419-424.
  6. B. Divecha et al, "Impact of Node Mobility on MANET Routing Protocols Models", Journal of Digital Information Management, February2007.
  7. Valentina Timcenko, Mirjana Stojanovic, Slavica Bostjancic rakas,"MANET Routing Protocols vs. Mobility Models:Performance Analysis and Comparison", Proceedings of the 9th WSEAS International Conference on Applied Informatics and Communications (AIC '09)
  8. M. K. Jeya Kumar and R. S. Rajesh," Performance Analysis of MANET Routing Protocols in Different Mobility Models", IJCSNS International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security, VOL. 9 No. 2, February 2009.
  9. T. G. Basavaraju and S. K. Sarkar, "Effect of Random Mobility Models Pattern in Mobile Ad hoc Networks" IJCSNS International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security, VOL. 7 No. 6, June 2007.
  10. Harminder S. Bindra, Sunil K. Maakar and A. L. Sangal,"Performance Evaluation of Two Reactive Routing Protocols of MANET using Group Mobility Model", IJCSI International Journal of Computer Science Issues, Vol. 7, Issue 3, No 10, May 2010 ,ISSN (Online): 1694-0784, ISSN (Print): 1694-0814.
  11. Ravinder Ahuja,' Simulation based Performance Evaluation and Comparison of Reactive, Proactive and Hybrid Routing Protocols based on Random Waypoint Mobility Model", International Journal of Computer Applications (0975 – 8887) Volume 7– No. 11, October 2010
  12. Gowrishankar. S, SubirKumarSarkar, T. G. Basavaraju," Analysis of AOMDV and OLSR Routing Protocols Under Levy-Walk Mobility Model and Gauss-Markov Mobility Model for Ad Hoc Networks", (IJCSE) International Journal on Computer Science and Engineering Vol. 02, No. 04, 2010, 979-986
  13. C. Adijh, E. Baccelli, and P. Jacquet, "Link state routing in wireless adhoc networks," in MILCOM '03: Military Communications Conference. IEEE Computer Society, 2003, pp. 1274–1279
  14. Zhijiang Chang, Georgi Gaydadjiev, Stamatis Vassiliadis, "Routing Protocols for Mobile Ad-hoc Networks: Current Development and Evaluation", Computer Engineering laboratory, EEMCS, Delft University of Technology Mekelweg 4, 2628 CD Delft, the Netherlands.
  15. Young-Bae Ko and Nitin H. Vaidya,"Location-Aided Routing (LAR) in Mobile Ad hoc Networks. " Wireless Networks 6 (2000) 307–321
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Mobile Ad hoc Networks Mobility Models AODV DSR OLSR LAR. RWP RPGM MH GM