CFP last date
20 May 2024
Reseach Article

Multidimensional User Data Model for Web Personalization

by Nithin K. Anil, Sharath Basil Kurian, Aby Abahai T., Surekha Mariam Varghese
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 69 - Number 12
Year of Publication: 2013
Authors: Nithin K. Anil, Sharath Basil Kurian, Aby Abahai T., Surekha Mariam Varghese
10.5120/11896-7955

Nithin K. Anil, Sharath Basil Kurian, Aby Abahai T., Surekha Mariam Varghese . Multidimensional User Data Model for Web Personalization. International Journal of Computer Applications. 69, 12 ( May 2013), 32-37. DOI=10.5120/11896-7955

@article{ 10.5120/11896-7955,
author = { Nithin K. Anil, Sharath Basil Kurian, Aby Abahai T., Surekha Mariam Varghese },
title = { Multidimensional User Data Model for Web Personalization },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { May 2013 },
volume = { 69 },
number = { 12 },
month = { May },
year = { 2013 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 32-37 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume69/number12/11896-7955/ },
doi = { 10.5120/11896-7955 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T21:31:38.910492+05:30
%A Nithin K. Anil
%A Sharath Basil Kurian
%A Aby Abahai T.
%A Surekha Mariam Varghese
%T Multidimensional User Data Model for Web Personalization
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 69
%N 12
%P 32-37
%D 2013
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

Personalization is being applied to great extend in many systems. This paper presents a multi-dimensional user data model and its application in web search. Online and Offline activities of the user are tracked for creating the user model. The main phases are identification of relevant documents and the representation of relevance and similarity of the documents. The concepts Keywords, Topics, URLs and clusters are used in the implementation. The algorithms for profiling, grading and clustering the concepts in the user model and algorithm for determining the personalized search results by re-ranking the results in a search bank are presented in this paper. Simple experiments for evaluation of the model and their results are described.

References
  1. Mathew Gray, Web Growth Summary, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Available: http://www. mit. edu /people /mkgray /net/web-growth-summary. html
  2. Miniwatts Marketing Group , Internet World Stats – Usage and Population Statistics site, Available: http://www. internetworldstats. com/emarketing. html
  3. Chris Putnam, Faster Simpler Photo Uploads, February 5, 2010,http://blog. facebook. com/blog. php?post=206178097130
  4. Andrew Couts, YouTube: Now serving 4 billion+ video views daily, JANUARY 23, 2012. http://www. digitaltrends. com/web/youtube-now-serving-4-billion-video-views-daily/
  5. Mobasher B. , Dai H. , Luo T. and Nakagawa M. , Discovery and evaluation of aggregate usage profiles for web personalization, Data mining and knowledge discovery, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 61-82, 2002 .
  6. Mulvenna M. D. , Anand S. S. and Buchner A. G, Personalization on the net using web mining,. Communications of the ACM, 43, 8, August 2000, pp: 123– 125.
  7. Aktas M. S. , Nacar M. A. , and Menczer F. , Advances in Web Mining and Web Usage Analysis, Proceedings of 6th SIGKDD Workshop on Web Mining and Web Usage Analysis WebKDD 2004, volume 3932 of LNAI, page 104--115. Springer, 2006.
  8. Bamshad Mobasher, Data Mining forWeb Personalization In The Adaptive Web: Methods and Strategies of Web Personalization, Brusilovsky,. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 4321, PP. 90-135, Springer, Berlin-Heidelberg, 2007. ,Available: http://maya. cs. depaul. edu/ mobasher/papers/aw07-mobasher. pdf
  9. Kapil Goenka, Mobile Web Search Personalization using Ontological User profile, Master of Science Thesis, The University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, 2009. Available: www. cs. uga. edu/~budak/thesis/kapil_thesis. pdf
  10. Magdalini Eirinaki, Michalis Vazirgiannis, Web Mining for Web Personalization, ACM Transactions on Internet Technology, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp: 1-27, February 2003.
  11. Fang Liu, Clement Yu and Weiyi Meng, Personalized Web Search For Improving Retrieval Effectiveness, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, VOL. 16, NO. 1, January 2004.
  12. Ferragina P. and Gulli A. , A personalized search engine based on Web-snippet hierarchical clustering, Journal of Software: Practice and Experience,Volume 38, Issue 2, pages 189–225, February 2008.
  13. Kurien Zacharia, Eldo P. Elias and Surekha Mariam Varghese, Personalised Product Design Using Virtual Interactive Techniques, International Journal of Computer Graphics & Animation (IJCGA) Vol. 2, No. 1, pp:1-9, January 2012.
  14. Konstan J. , Miller B. , Maltz D. , Herlocker J. , Gordon L. , and J. Riedl, GroupLens: Applying collaborative filtering to usenet news. CACM (40) 3, 1997.
  15. Herlocker J. , Konstan J. ,Borchers A. , and Riedl A. , An algorithmic framework for performing collaborative filtering. In Proceedings of the Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, August 1999.
  16. Xiaoyuan Su and Taghi M. Khoshgoftaar, A Survey of Collaborative Filtering Techniques, Advances in Artificial Intelligence, Journal Advances in Artificial Intelligence, Number 4, January 2009, pp. 1-20.
  17. Goldberg K. , Roeder T. , Gupta D. , and Perkins C. , Eigentaste: a constant time collaborative filtering algorithm, Information Retrieval, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 133–151, 2001.
  18. Yoon Ho Cho, Jae Kyeong Kim and Soung Hie Kim, A personalized recommender system based on web usage mining and decision tree induction, Expert Systems with Applications , pp 329–342,2002.
  19. Google News - African Studies Companion, Available: www. africanstudiescompanion. com/cgi-bin/online /section25_3 . shtml
  20. Nancy Blachman and Jerry Peek, How Google Works, http://www. googleguide. com/google_works. html
  21. Sandeep Kumar Khanikekar, Web Forensics, The Department of Computing Sciences Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi, Corpus Christi, Texas, Fall 2010. http://sci. tamucc. edu/~cams/projects/345. pdf
  22. Sarah Lowman, MSc Forensic Informatics Thesis, University of Strathclyde, Sept 2010. Available: http://lowmanio. co. uk/share/WebHistoryVisualisationForForensicInvestigations. pdf
  23. Caroline Lyon, Bob Dickerson, James Malcolm, Incremental Retrieval of documents relevant to a topic, Proceedings of TREC 2002. University of Hertfordshire, UK. Available at http://trec. nist. gov/pubs/trec11/papers/hertfordshire. lyon. pdf
  24. Shafi S. M. and Rafiq A. Rather, Precision and Recall of Five Search Engines for Retrieval of Scholarly Information in the Field of Biotechnology, Webology, Volume 2, Number 2, August, 2005.
  25. Sampath Kumar B. T. and Prakash J. N. , Precision and Relative Recall of Search Engines: A Comparative Study of Google and Yahoo, Singapore Journal of Library & Information Management, Volume 38, 2009, pp-124-137. , http://www. las. org. sg/sjlim/SJLIM20094S ampath. pdf
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Knowledge Management Personalized Systems Web Services World Wide Web