CFP last date
20 May 2024
Call for Paper
June Edition
IJCA solicits high quality original research papers for the upcoming June edition of the journal. The last date of research paper submission is 20 May 2024

Submit your paper
Know more
The week's pick
Responsive image
Enhancing Privacy Preservation: Multi-Attribute Protection with P-Sensitive K-Anonymity

Twinkle Patel Kiran Amin
Random Articles
Reseach Article

Sensitivity of the Risk Factors for the Progression of Ocular Hypertension to Primary Open Angle Glaucoma

by M. Waly, Amr Sharawy, Khaeld Wahba, Ayman Salah, Islam Ibrahem
journal cover thumbnail

International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 70 - Number 22
Year of Publication: 2013
Authors: M. Waly, Amr Sharawy, Khaeld Wahba, Ayman Salah, Islam Ibrahem
10.5120/12202-8486

M. Waly, Amr Sharawy, Khaeld Wahba, Ayman Salah, Islam Ibrahem . Sensitivity of the Risk Factors for the Progression of Ocular Hypertension to Primary Open Angle Glaucoma. International Journal of Computer Applications. 70, 22 ( May 2013), 34-42. DOI=10.5120/12202-8486

@article{ 10.5120/12202-8486,
author = { M. Waly, Amr Sharawy, Khaeld Wahba, Ayman Salah, Islam Ibrahem },
title = { Sensitivity of the Risk Factors for the Progression of Ocular Hypertension to Primary Open Angle Glaucoma },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { May 2013 },
volume = { 70 },
number = { 22 },
month = { May },
year = { 2013 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 34-42 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume70/number22/12202-8486/ },
doi = { 10.5120/12202-8486 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T21:33:34.663196+05:30
%A M. Waly
%A Amr Sharawy
%A Khaeld Wahba
%A Ayman Salah
%A Islam Ibrahem
%T Sensitivity of the Risk Factors for the Progression of Ocular Hypertension to Primary Open Angle Glaucoma
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 70
%N 22
%P 34-42
%D 2013
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

In this article we evaluate the sensitivity of the risk factors of ocular hypertension progression in primary open angle glaucoma in order to distinguish between the three risk levels based on prediction classification models. The prediction classification models were trained and testing by using the most common risk factors from examination of 398 Egyptian patients. Standard classification trees as well as bagged classification were used. We classify the risk level into three risk levels which are high, middle and low based on the combination of the structural and functional risk factors. The classification outcomes of the trees were compared and we measured the sensitivity of each risk factor. The bagged classification has the best accuracy which is 87. 7% for training datasets and 72. 2% for testing datasets with area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROC) 0. 925 while decision tree gave 80% for training datasets and 68. 7% for testing datasets with AUROC 0. 868. The central cornea thickness (CCT) gave the best with average AUROC 0. 946. Bagged classification tree promises to be a new and efficient approach for glaucoma classification. The CCT is very important risk factor due to its classification sensitivity.

References
  1. Langman MJS, Lancashire RJ, Cheng K, Stewart PM. 2005. Systemic hypertension and glaucoma: mechanisms in common and co occurrence. Bri J Ophthal. ; 89(8):960-3.
  2. Mozaffarieh M, Grieshaber MC, Flammer J. 2008. Oxygen and blood flow: players in the pathogenesis of glaucoma. Mol Vis. ; 31; 14:224-33.
  3. Bourne RR. 2006. Worldwide glaucoma through the looking glass. Br J Ophthalmol;90:253–4.
  4. Dielemans I, VingerlingJR,Wolfs RCW, et ?al. , 1994. The prevalence of primary ?open-angle ?glaucoma in a population-based study in the ?Netherlands. The ?Rotterdam Study, ?Ophthalmology; 101:1851–5. ?
  5. Topouzis F, Wilson MR, Harris A, et al. , ?Prevalence of open angle ?glaucoma in Greece. ?The Thessaloniki Eye Study, Am J ?Ophthalmol?,????2007;144:511–19
  6. Mohamed Eldaly, Mostafa Hunter, Mohamed Khafagy; 2007. The socioeconomic impact among Egyptian glaucoma patients Br J Ophthalmol;91:1274–1275.
  7. G. E. Trope, Glaucoma: A Patient's Guide ?to the Disease (Univ. of ?Toronto Pr. , 2001)?
  8. J. J. Kanski, J. A. McAllister, 1989?. Glaucoma: A ?Coulour Manual of Diagnosis ?and Treatment ??(Butterworths, London, Boston, Singapore, ?Sydney, ?Toronto, Wellington,
  9. Kanski JJ. 2003. CLINICAL ?OPHTHALMOLOGY. Oxford: Butterworth ?Heinemann,. (Guideline Ref ID: ?KANSKI2003) page 102:135. ?
  10. Quigley HA. 1996. Number of people with glaucoma worldwide. Br J Ophthalmol; 80:389–393.
  11. Kahn HA, Leibowitz HM, Ganley JP, et al. 1977. The Framingham Eye Study. I. Outline and major prevalence findings. Am J Epidemiol; 106:17–32.
  12. Tielsch JM, Katz J, Singh K, et al. 1991. A population-based evaluation of glaucoma screening: the Baltimore Eye Survey. Am J Epidemiol; 134:1102– 1110.
  13. Klein BE, Klein R, Sponsel WE, et al. 1992. Prevalence of glaucoma. The Beaver Dam Eye Study. Ophthalmology; 99:1499–1504.
  14. Rodriguez J, Sanchez R, Munoz B, et al. 2002. Causes of blindness and visual impairment in a population-based sample of U. S. Hispanics. Ophthalmology; 109:737–743.
  15. HattenhauerMG, Johnson DH, Ing HH, et al. 1998. The probability of blindness from open-angle glaucoma. Ophthalmology; 105:2099–2104.
  16. Schoff EO, Hattenhauer MG, Ing HH, et al. 2001. Estimated incidence of open-angle glaucoma in Olmsted County, Minnesota. Ophthalmology; 108:882– 886.
  17. Leske MC, Connell AM, Schachat AP, Hyman L. 1994. The Barbados Eye Study. Prevalence of open angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol; 112:821– 829.
  18. National Eye Institute/Prevent Blindness America. 2002. Vision problems in the U. S. : prevalence of adult vision impairment and age-related eye disease in America. 4th ed. Chicago: Prevent Blindness America.
  19. Mason RP, Kosoko O, Wilson MR, et al. 1989. National survey of the prevalence and risk factors of glaucoma in St. Lucia, West Indies. Part I. Prevalence findings. Ophthalmology; 96:1363–1368.
  20. Mitchell P, Smith W, Attebo K, Healey PR. 1996. Prevalence of open-angle glaucoma in Australia. The Blue Mountains Eye Study. Ophthalmology; 103:1661–1669.
  21. Wensor MD, McCarty CA, Stanislavsky YL, et al. 1998. The prevalence of glaucoma in the Melbourne Visual Impairment Project. Ophthalmology; 105:733– 739.
  22. Chen PP. 2003. Blindness in patients with treated open angle glaucoma. Ophthalmology; 110:726–733.
  23. Rothman KJ. 1986. Modern Epidemiology. 1st ed. Boston: Little, Brown.
  24. Foster PJ, Buhrmann R, Quigley HA, et al. 2002. The definition and classification of glaucoma in prevalence surveys. Br J Ophthalmol. ;86:238–242.
  25. ??Gordon, M. O. , Beiser, J. A. , et al. 2002. The ?ocular hypertension treatment ?study: baseline ?factors that predict the onset of primary open-?angle ?glaucomaArch. Ophthalmol ,714–??720; discussion 829–830. ?
  26. ?Miglior, S. , Pfeiffer, N. , et al. 2007. Predictive ?factors for open angle ?glaucoma among ?patients with ocular hypertension in the ?European ?glaucoma prevention study. ?Ophthalmology?,?? 114(1): 3–9. ?
  27. Gordon, M. O. , Torri, V. , et al. 2007. ?Validated prediction model for ?the ?development of primary open-angle ?glaucoma in individuals with ?ocular ?hypertension. Ophthalmology?,????,114(1): 10–19. ?
  28. Miglior, S. 2007. Risk factors for ?development of glaucoma. ?European ?Ophthalmology review ,, ??105(1): 4–8. ?
  29. ?Gordon, M. O. and Kass, M. A. 1999. The ?ocular hypertension treatment ?study: design ?and baseline description of the participants. ?Arch. ?Ophthalmol, 117(5): 573–583. ?
  30. ?Friedman DS, Wilson MR, Liebmann?JM, et a. 2004. An evidence-based ?assessment of risk ?factors for the progression of ocular ?hypertension and ?glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol??Sep;138(3 Suppl):S19-31. ?
  31. ?Anderson DR, Drance SM, Schulzer?M; 2003 . Collaborative Normal-Tension ?Glaucoma ?Study Group. Factors that predict the benefit ?of lowering ?intraocular pressure in normal ?tension glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol???Nov;136(5):820-9. ?
  32. ?Shiose Y. 1984. The aging effect on ?intraocular pressure in an apparently ?normal ?population. Arch Ophthalmol ?Jun;102(6):883-7. ?
  33. ?Detry-Morel M, Zeyen T, Kestelyn P, ?et al. 2004. Screening for glaucoma in a ?general ?population with the non-mydriatic funds ?camera and the ?frequency doubling perimeter. ?Eur J Ophthalmol SepOct;14(5):387-??93. ?
  34. ?Ehlers, N. , Bramsen, T. , et al. ?Applanation tonometry and central ?corneal ?thickness. ActaOphthalmol. 1975,53(1): 34–??43. ?
  35. ?Whitacre, M. M. , Stein, R. A. , et al. 2004. The ?effect of corneal thickness on ?applanation ?tonometry. Am. J. Ophthalmol?. ??115(5): ??592–596. ?
  36. Herndon, L. W. , Choudhri, S. A. , et al. ?1997. Central corneal thickness in ?normal, ?glaucomatous, and ocular hypertensive eyes. ?Arch. Ophthalmol,115(9): 1137–1141. ?
  37. ?Copt, R. P. , Thomas, R. , et al. 1999. Corneal ?thickness in ocular hypertension, ?primary ?open-angle glaucoma, and normal tension ?glaucoma. Arch. ?Ophthalmol,117(1): ??14–16. ?
  38. Doughty, M. J. and Zaman,M. L. ?2000. Human corneal thickness and its ?impact on ?intraocular pressure measures: a review and ?meta-analysis ?approach. Surv. Ophthalmol. ??,44(5): 367–408. ?
  39. ?Brandt, J. D. 2001. The influence of corneal ?thickness on the diagnosis and ?management of ?glaucoma. J. Glaucoma, , 10(5 (Suppl 1)): ?S65–S67. ?
  40. ?Sommer 1995. A. Retinal nerve fiber layer. ?Am J Ophthalmol. ;120:665–??667?
  41. ?Sommer A, Katz J, Quigley HA, et al. 1991. ?Clinically detectable nerve fiber ?atrophy ?precedes the onset of glaucomatous field loss. ?Arch Ophthalmol. ??;109:77–83?
  42. ?Sommer A, Miller NR, Pollack I, et ?al. 1977. The nerve fiber layer in the ?diagnosis of ?glaucoma. ArchOphthalmol. ; 95:2149–??2156. ?
  43. Caprioli j. 1992. Discrimination between ?normal and glaucomatous eyes. ?Invest ?opthalmolvis sci. ;33;153-159?
  44. Mardin CY. And Peter A. 2006. Improving?glaucoma diagnosis by ?combination of ?perimetry and HRT measurements. J ?Glaucoma. ??;15;299-305. ?
  45. Shah NN. 2006 . Combining structural and ?functional testing for detection ?of glaucoma. Opthalmology. 113;1593-??1602. ?
  46. ?R. T. Cox, 1961. The Algebra of Probable ?Inference. Baltimore, MD: Johns?Hopkins ?Univ. Press. ?
  47. ?N. Friedman, D. Geiger, and M. ?Goldszmidt, 1997. "Bayesian network ?classifiers," ?Machine Learning, , , vol. 29, pp. 131–??163.
  48. Mohamed WALy, Amr Sahrawy and K. Wahba. 2013. A Comparison of Different Prediction Models in the Progression of Ocular hypertension to Primary Open Angle Glaucoma '' International Journal of Applied Information Systems (IJAIS) –, Volume 5– No. 3.
  49. Breiman L, Friedman JH, Olshen RA, et al. 1984. Classification and Regression Trees. California: Wadsworth;.
  50. Breiman L. 1998. Arcing Classifiers. The Annals of Statistics. ; 26: 801–824.
  51. Stehman, Stephen V. 1997 ??"Selecting and interpreting measures ?of ?thematic classification accuracy". Remote ?Sensing of Environment. 62 (1): ??77–89. ?doi:10. 1016/S0034-4257(97)00083-7?
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Glaucoma Ocular hypertension Primary open angle glaucoma risk factors

Powered by PhDFocusTM