CFP last date
22 April 2024
Reseach Article

Adopting Medical Computer Systems: The Perspectives of Physicians in a Poor Setting

by Jerome Addah, Stephen Apanga, Mustapha Issahaku
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 75 - Number 18
Year of Publication: 2013
Authors: Jerome Addah, Stephen Apanga, Mustapha Issahaku
10.5120/13352-0929

Jerome Addah, Stephen Apanga, Mustapha Issahaku . Adopting Medical Computer Systems: The Perspectives of Physicians in a Poor Setting. International Journal of Computer Applications. 75, 18 ( August 2013), 43-47. DOI=10.5120/13352-0929

@article{ 10.5120/13352-0929,
author = { Jerome Addah, Stephen Apanga, Mustapha Issahaku },
title = { Adopting Medical Computer Systems: The Perspectives of Physicians in a Poor Setting },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { August 2013 },
volume = { 75 },
number = { 18 },
month = { August },
year = { 2013 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 43-47 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume75/number18/13352-0929/ },
doi = { 10.5120/13352-0929 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T21:44:37.888076+05:30
%A Jerome Addah
%A Stephen Apanga
%A Mustapha Issahaku
%T Adopting Medical Computer Systems: The Perspectives of Physicians in a Poor Setting
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 75
%N 18
%P 43-47
%D 2013
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

The study sort to determine if physicians in poor settings were ready to use EMR systems: and also to find out which EMR system functional specifications and requirements would suit their practice. Statistical methods used in this study include univariate, bivariate and multivariate analytical techniques. From the univariate analysis we were able to unearth an existing culture of computer use among responding physicians, with the bivariate techniques we established that facilitate physician workflow and workload management were considered relevant by physicians. Results from the multivariate analysis indicated that systems with ubiquitous presence that were easily accessible, and those without any downtime had a predictive effect on a physician's decision of system capability relevance.

References
  1. McLane S. Designing an EMR Planning Process Based on Staff Attitudes Toward and Opinions About Computers in Healthcare. Computers Informatics Nursing l 2005;. 23: 85-92.
  2. Da've D. Benefits and Barriers to EMR Implementation. Caring. l2004;23: :50–51.
  3. Boonstra A, Broekhui, M. RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Barriers to the acceptance of electronic medical records by physicians from systematic review to taxonomy and interventions. BMC Health Services Research l2010: 10 - 23.
  4. Davidson E, Heslinga, D. . . Bridging the IT Adoption Gap for Small Physician Practices: An Action Research Study on Electronic Health Records. Information Systems Management l2007;; 24: 15–28.
  5. DesRoches C, Campbell EG, Rao SR, Donelan K, Ferris TG, Jha A, Kaushal R, Levy DE, Rosenbaum S, Shield AE, Blumenthal D. Electronic Health Records in Ambulatory Care - A National Survey of Physicians. New England Journal of Medicine. l2008;;359(1):: 50–60.
  6. Meinert D. Resistance to Electronic Medical Records (EMRs): A Barrier to Improved Quality of Care. Issues in Informing Science & Information Technology l 2005;2:: 493–504.
  7. Fleurant M, Kell R, Jenter C, Volk LA, Zhang F, Bates DW, Simon SR. Factors associated with difficult electronic health record implementation in office practic. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012 Jul-Aug; l2012;19: 541-4.
  8. Vishwanath A, Scamurra SD. l. Health Informatics Journal. ;. Barriers to the Adoption of Electronic Health Records: Using Concept Mapping to Develop a Comprehensive Empirical Mode. l2007;13: :119–134.
  9. Terry A, Thorpe CF, Giles GG, Brown JB, Harris SB, Reid GJ, Thind A, Stewart M. Canadian Family Physician. Implementing Electronic Health Records. l 2008;;54:: 730-736.
  10. Simon, SR, Kalshal R, Cleary PD, Jenter CA, Volk LA, Oray EJ, Burdick E, Poon EG, Bates DW. . ;. Physicians and Electronic Health Records: A Statewide Survey. Archives of Internal Medicine. l2007;167: 507–512.
  11. Jha A, Bates DW, Jenter C, Orav EJ, Zheng J, Cleary P, Simon R. . . Electronic Health Records: Use, Barriers and Satisfaction Among Physicians Who Care For Black and Hispanic Patients. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice. l2009;;15: 158–163.
  12. Meade B, Buckley D, Boland M. What Factors Affect the Use of Electronic Patient Records by Irish GPs? International Journal of Medical Informatics l . 2009;. 78: :551-558.
  13. Pizziferri L KA, Volk LA, Honour MM, Gupta S, Wang S, Wang T, Lippincott M, Li Q, Bates DW. . ;. . Primary Care Physician Time Utilization Before and After Implementation of an Electronic Health Record: A time-motion Study. Journal of Biomedical Informatics l 2005;38: 176-188.
  14. Randeree E. Exploring Physician Adoption of EMRs: A Multi-Case Analysis. Journal of Medical System. l2007;31: 489-496.
  15. Ludwick DA DJtp. Primary Care Physicians' Experience with Electronic Medical Records: Barriers to Implementation in a Fee-for-Service Environmen. International Journal of Telemedicine and Applications l 2009. : 853-524.
  16. Valdes I, Kibbe DC, Tolleson G, Kunik ME, Petersen LA. . ;. Barriers to Proliferation of Electronic Medical Records. Informatics in Primary Care l2004;12: 3-9.
  17. Menachemi N, Langley A, Brooks RG. . . The Use of Information Technologies Among Rural and Urban Physicians in Florida. Journal of Medical Systems l2007; 31: 483–488.
  18. Loomis G, Ries S, Saywell RM, Thakker NR. ;. If Electronic Medical Records Are So Great, Why Aren't Family Physicians Using them? Journal of Family Practice. l2002;51: 636-641.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Electronic medical records medical compute system capabilities