CFP last date
20 May 2024
Reseach Article

A Comparative Result Analysis of Human Cancer Diagnosis using Ensemble Classification Methods

by Jogendra Singh Kushwah, Divakar Singh
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 77 - Number 3
Year of Publication: 2013
Authors: Jogendra Singh Kushwah, Divakar Singh
10.5120/13373-0977

Jogendra Singh Kushwah, Divakar Singh . A Comparative Result Analysis of Human Cancer Diagnosis using Ensemble Classification Methods. International Journal of Computer Applications. 77, 3 ( September 2013), 14-18. DOI=10.5120/13373-0977

@article{ 10.5120/13373-0977,
author = { Jogendra Singh Kushwah, Divakar Singh },
title = { A Comparative Result Analysis of Human Cancer Diagnosis using Ensemble Classification Methods },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { September 2013 },
volume = { 77 },
number = { 3 },
month = { September },
year = { 2013 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 14-18 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume77/number3/13373-0977/ },
doi = { 10.5120/13373-0977 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T21:49:17.864635+05:30
%A Jogendra Singh Kushwah
%A Divakar Singh
%T A Comparative Result Analysis of Human Cancer Diagnosis using Ensemble Classification Methods
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 77
%N 3
%P 14-18
%D 2013
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

Cancer research has been an interesting and challenging research area in the field of medical science. Classification techniques have been found useful in early diagnosis of cancer and better treatment. For diagnosis of cancer various classification methods are used but they suffer with one or more disadvantages. In this paper ensemble based classification methods which combine the prediction of individual classifiers to generate the final prediction are discussed. The methods discussed are Bagging, Boosting and Random Forest Algorithm. These ensemble methods have shown improvement in quality of result as compared to commonly used single classifier e. g. decision tree or neural network . The improvement in classification is however at the cost extra processing time and higher storage as decision tree or neural network are faster as compared to ensemble based techniques. The ideas for further improvement in this field are also discussed in this paper. Methods discussed in the paper are applied on human cancer data for appropriate cancer gene selection which leads to classification of cancer.

References
  1. L. Breiman ,Bagging predictors, Machine Learning, 24(2):123-140, 1996.
  2. Henrik Bostrom,Ronnie Johansson and Alexadder Karlsson, On evidential combination rules for ensemble classifiers, Modelling and Simulation, 18(2), 112-116, 1998.
  3. T. K. Ho, The random subspace method of constructing decision forest , IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 20(8):832-844, 1998.
  4. M Ozaki, Y. Adachi, Y. Iwahori, and N. Ishii, Application of fuzzy theory to writer recognition of Chinese characters, International Journal of Modelling and Simulation, 18(2), 112-116, 1998.
  5. E. Baur and R. Kohavi,An empirical comparison of voting classification algorithms: Bagging, boosting and variants, Machine earning, 36(1-2):105-139, 1999.
  6. L. Brieman, Random Forests, Machine Learning, vol. 5, 2001.
  7. Robert E. Schapire, The Boosting Approach to Machine Learning An Overview, Nonlinear Estimation and Classification,Springer, 2003
  8. Tuba Kiyan,Tuba Yildirim, Breast Cancer Diagnosis using statistical neural networks, Journel of Electrical and Eelectronics Engineering, Istanbul Universit, 1149-1153, 2004.
  9. R. J. Roiger,M. W, Data Ming : A Tutorial-Based Primer, Addison Wesly, 2004
  10. I. H. Witten. E. Frank, Data Mining, 2nd ed, Morgan Kaufmann, 2005.
  11. Juan J. Rodriguez,Jesus M. Maudes, Carlos J. Alonso, Rotation-based Ensembles of RBF networks, European Symposium on Artificial Neural Networks, 2-930307-06-4, 2006.
  12. Feng Chu and Lipo Wang ,Applying RBF neural networks to cancer classification based on gene expression Intentional Joint Conference on Neural Networks, Vancouver,BC,Canada, 2006.
  13. Hyontai Sug, International Journal of Mathematics and Computers in Sumulation, 2010.
  14. G. Sophia Reena,P. Rajeswarei, A survey of human cancer classification using micro array data, International Journal o Computer technology and Applications ), 1523-1533, 2011.
  15. Kobalan Moorthy and Mohd Saberi Mohammad, Random forest for gee selection and microarray data classification,Bioinformation, 0973-2063, 2011.
  16. Dr A. Chirta and S Uma, An Ensemble Model of Multiple Classifiers, International Journal of Computer Theory and Engineering, 1793-8201,Jun-2012.
  17. Evathia E. Tripoliti,Dimitrios I. ,Fotiadis,George Manis, Automated diagnosis of diseases based on classification : dynamic determination of the number of tress in random forest algorithm, IEEE Transactions of Information Technology in Biomedicine, Jul-2012
  18. Eun-Hye Jang,Byoung-Jun Park,Sang-Hyeob Kim and Jin-Hun Sohn, Emotion classification based on physiological signals induced by negative emotions, IEEE, 978-1-4673-0390-3/12, 2012.
  19. Gouda I. Salama, M. B. Abdelhalim, and Magdy Abd- elghany Zeid, Breast Cancer Diagnosis on Three Different Datasets Using Multi-Classifiers, International Journal of Computer and Information Technology, (2277 – 0764), Sep-2012.
  20. Cuong Nguyen,Yong Wang,, Ha Nam Nguyen, Random forest classifier combined with feature selection for breast cancer diagnosis and prognostic , Journal of Biomedical Science and Enginnerring, 6, 551-560, 2013.
  21. WEKA, The University of Waikato, www. cs. waikato. ac. nz/ml/weka
  22. UCI Machine Learning Repository, http://archive. ics. uci. edu/ml/.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Bagging Boosting Cancer Classification Ensemble Classification Methods Random Forest