CFP last date
20 May 2024
Reseach Article

Evaluation Models for Building Learning Content Management System (LCMS) in Riyadh City Universities

by Abdulaziz Ibrahim Alhrrah, Walid Qassim Qwaider
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 78 - Number 12
Year of Publication: 2013
Authors: Abdulaziz Ibrahim Alhrrah, Walid Qassim Qwaider
10.5120/13577-1321

Abdulaziz Ibrahim Alhrrah, Walid Qassim Qwaider . Evaluation Models for Building Learning Content Management System (LCMS) in Riyadh City Universities. International Journal of Computer Applications. 78, 12 ( September 2013), 28-34. DOI=10.5120/13577-1321

@article{ 10.5120/13577-1321,
author = { Abdulaziz Ibrahim Alhrrah, Walid Qassim Qwaider },
title = { Evaluation Models for Building Learning Content Management System (LCMS) in Riyadh City Universities },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { September 2013 },
volume = { 78 },
number = { 12 },
month = { September },
year = { 2013 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 28-34 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume78/number12/13577-1321/ },
doi = { 10.5120/13577-1321 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T21:51:24.713519+05:30
%A Abdulaziz Ibrahim Alhrrah
%A Walid Qassim Qwaider
%T Evaluation Models for Building Learning Content Management System (LCMS) in Riyadh City Universities
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 78
%N 12
%P 28-34
%D 2013
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

This paper proposes evaluation model based Learning Content Management System (LCMS) in the university city of Riyadh. The survey was conducted literature and practical web development methodologies to determine the readiness of LCMS University in the city of Riyadh. Framework is evaluated by a valuation model of e-learning anti-hunger program, proposed by Francesco Colace in 2006. Evaluation model was evaluated four main features (management and collaborative approach, interactive learning objects management and adaptation of the path of education). Involves every feature, in their determination, some sub-features. The results of the evaluation model as follows: The sum of the weights of the framework proposed in management feature is 16. 7/25, collaborative feature is 9/10, in the adaptive learning path is a 5. 5/10 in interactive learning object is 5/5. Sum of the weights of all the features are 36. 2/50. Then, the results were compared with each other. Weighs the sum of all of King Saud University and the University of Prince Sultan was 41. While the total weights of King Faisal University, IMAMU, YU and NAUSS was 40, 37. 36 and 32, respectively. The evaluation process shows that the proposed framework satisfied with the objectives and tasks required for this work.

References
  1. Colace F. , Santo M. D. , Pietrosanto A,"Evaluation Models for E-Learning Platform: an AHP approach", 1 84084 Fisciano (SA), Italy , Conference, 2006.
  2. Akkoyunlu B. , & Y?lmaz, M. Türetimci çoklu ortam ö?renme kuram?,"Generative multimedia learning environment", Hacettepe University, Journal of Education, 183-193, 2008.
  3. Georganas N. , El Saddik A. , LIU x,"An Implementable Architecture oF An E-Learning System",retrieval data 15/1/2008.
  4. Yan-qing W. , Li, L. , Chun-you,z. , Zeng-hua, H,"Teaching Model of Coding Standards Based on Evaluation Index System and Evaluating Platform",International Conference on Computer Science and Software Engineering, 2008.
  5. Cardona-Roman D. M,"Criteria for Build a Methodology for Evaluating E-Learning Impact in Students of Distance Education", National University Open and Distance, 2009.
  6. Lanzilotti R. , Ardito C. , Costabile M. F,"eLSE Methodology: a Systematic Approach to the e-Learning Systems Evaluation", retrieval date.
  7. Jurubescu T,"Learning Content Management Systems", Revista Informatica Economic?, nr. 4 (48), 2008.
  8. Ssemugabi S. , de Villiers R,"A Comparative Study of Two Usability Evaluation Methods Using a Web-Based E-Learning Application", ACM International Conference Proceeding Series; Vol. 226 Pages: 132 – 142,2007.
  9. Teo C. , Leng Gay R,"A Knowledge-Driven Model to Personalize ELearning", Journal on Educational Resources in Computing (JERIC), Volume 6 Issue 1, Publisher: ACM Press, 2006.
  10. Chu, H. , Chen, Y,"Modeling Knowledge of Mathematics Teaching for Students with Mathematical Learning Difficulties: A Knowledge Management Perspective", Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering and Computer, San Francisco, USA, October 20-22, 2009.
  11. Chin, S,K,"A Practical Model for Improving Student Learning of a Programming Language",36th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, San Diego, CA, October 28 – 31, 2006.
  12. Caton J. , Katzman J,"Evaluating Learning Content Management Systems (LCMS) Establishing Criteria for Comparison",Peer3 white paper: May 15, 2001.
  13. Colace F. , De Santo M. , Vento M,"Evaluating On-line Learning Platforms: a Case Study", Proceedings of the 36th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'03), 2003.
  14. Belton V,"Multiple criteria decision analysis practically the only way to choose", Hendry LC, Eglese RW, editors. Operational research tutorial papers, 1990, pp. 53-102.
  15. Allen E. , Seaman J,"Online Education in the United States",BABSON Survey Rearch Group, Sloan-C™. Retrieved in 2008. http://www. sloan-c. org/publications/survey/staying_course.
  16. Abdelhaq M. S,"A Conceptual Framework for Building a Learning Content Management System in Jordan" The Arab Academy For Banking And Financial Sciences Faculty of Information Technology Computer Information System Dep,, Jordan 2009.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

E-Learning E-Learning Platform LCMS AHP evaluation model Multiple Criteria Decision Making Problem.