CFP last date
20 May 2024
Call for Paper
June Edition
IJCA solicits high quality original research papers for the upcoming June edition of the journal. The last date of research paper submission is 20 May 2024

Submit your paper
Know more
The week's pick
Responsive image
Enhancing Privacy Preservation: Multi-Attribute Protection with P-Sensitive K-Anonymity

Twinkle Patel Kiran Amin
Random Articles
Reseach Article

Flexibility Analysis in Business Process Reengineering with Theory of Constraint using Intelligent Dynamic Workflow System

by Shweta Tayade, Vinay Chavan
journal cover thumbnail

International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 80 - Number 12
Year of Publication: 2013
Authors: Shweta Tayade, Vinay Chavan
10.5120/13915-1821

Shweta Tayade, Vinay Chavan . Flexibility Analysis in Business Process Reengineering with Theory of Constraint using Intelligent Dynamic Workflow System. International Journal of Computer Applications. 80, 12 ( October 2013), 32-39. DOI=10.5120/13915-1821

@article{ 10.5120/13915-1821,
author = { Shweta Tayade, Vinay Chavan },
title = { Flexibility Analysis in Business Process Reengineering with Theory of Constraint using Intelligent Dynamic Workflow System },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { October 2013 },
volume = { 80 },
number = { 12 },
month = { October },
year = { 2013 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 32-39 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume80/number12/13915-1821/ },
doi = { 10.5120/13915-1821 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T21:54:23.634336+05:30
%A Shweta Tayade
%A Vinay Chavan
%T Flexibility Analysis in Business Process Reengineering with Theory of Constraint using Intelligent Dynamic Workflow System
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 80
%N 12
%P 32-39
%D 2013
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

IT enabled organizations strive for overall improvement in performance with the use of tools capable of forecasting the stability and growth as well as failure. This paper contributes by introducing a technique and a model in Business process reengineering with Theory of constraints using dynamic workflow system enhanced with artificial intelligent 'agents' to observe the impact of flexibility on the performance of the organization. The paper also presents a model that has been verified by a developed tool which majorly deals with runtime change management capable of dealing with flexibility by change in workflow system in the domain of Human resource management.

References
  1. Davenport, T. H. and J. E. Short, 1990. Summer The new industrial engineering: Information technology and business process Reengineering. Sloan Management Review, 31(4): 11-27.
  2. Farid Abdolazimian and Saeedeh Mansouri. Business Process Reengineering by Rational Unified Process (RUP) Methodology: In Proc World Appl. Sci. J. , 4 (Supple 2): 33-42, 2008
  3. Davenport, T. H. , 1993. Process innovation: Reengineering work through information technology. Boston: Harvard Business Press.
  4. Parker, J. , 1993. May. An ABC guide to business process reengineering. Industrial Engineering, 25(5): 52-53.
  5. Sotiris Zigiaris: "Business Process Reengineering", Report produced for the EC funded project; January 2000
  6. Dietz, J. L. G. and Mulder H. B. F. , (1996), Integrating the Strategic and Technical Approach to Business Process Reengineering, In: Business Process Modelling, Scholz-Reiter B. , Stickel E. ,ed. , pp. 188-206
  7. Prasad B. (1999), "Hybrid re-engineering strategies for process improvement", Business Process Management Journal, Volume 5, No. 2, pp. 178 – 197.
  8. Kovacic A. , Krisper M. , Groznik A. (2001), "Business Process Renovation: Rethinking toward e-business". Proceedings of the 7TH International Conference on Re-Technologies for Information Systems, Lyon, France, pp. 175-188, 2001
  9. Dr. Mirko Vintar, BPR and Workflow Management Paradigm in Public Administration Context: New approaches to Information Systems Analysis and Design, 2001
  10. J. Sinur, J. B. Hill: " Magic Quadrant for Business Process Management Suites", Gartner Research, Pub-Date 18-Oct 2010,ID Number: G00205212
  11. M. Attaran: "Exploring the Relationship between Information Technology and Business Process Reengineering. Information & Management", 41(5), pp. 585-596, 2004.
  12. M. Netjes , I. Vanderfeesten, , and H. Reijers: "Intelligent tools for workflow process redesign: A research agenda". Vol. 3812 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 444–453. Springer Verlag, Berlin, 2005
  13. Towards a Taxonomy of Process Flexibility (Extended Version). by: N. A. Mulyar, M. H. Schonenberg, Mans, van der Aalst 2007 ;In BPM Center Report BPM-07-11 (2007) citeulike:4814985
  14. K. Kumar and M. M. Narasipuram. Defining requirements for business process flexibility. In Workshop on Business Process Modeling, Design and Support (BP- MDS06), Proceedings of CAiSE06 Workshops, pages 137–148, 2006.
  15. P. Soffer. On the notion of flexibility in business processes. In Workshop on Business Process Modeling, Design and Support (BPMDS05), Proceedings of CAiSE05 Workshops, pages 35–42,2005. http://mis. haifa. ac. il/~spnina/publications/flexibility%20Soffer. pdf.
  16. A. Snowdon, B. C. Warboys, R. M. Greenwood, C. P. Holland, P. J. Kawalek, and D. R. Shaw. On the architecture and form of flexible process support. Software Process Improvement and Practice, 12:21–34, 2007.
  17. M. H. Schonenberg, R. S. Mans, N. C. Russell, N. A. Mulyar and W. M. P. van der Aals. Towards a Taxonomy of Process Flexibility (Extended Version)
  18. G. Regev and A. Wegmann. A regulation-based view on business process and supporting system flexibility. In Workshop on Business Process Modeling, Design
  19. F. Daoudi and S. Nurcan. A benchmarking framework for methods to design flexible business processes. Software Process Improvement and Practice, 12:51–63, 2007.
  20. G. Regev, I. Bider, and A. Wegmann. Defining business process flexibility with the help of invariants. Software Process Improvement and Practice, 12:65–79, 2007.
  21. G. Regev, P. Soffer, and R. Schmidt. Taxonomy of flexibility in business processes. In Proceedings of the 7th Workshop on Business Process Modelling, Development and Support(BPMDS'06), 2006. http://lamswww. epfl. ch/conference/bpmds06/taxbpflex.
  22. G. Regev, I. Bider, and A. Wegmann. Defining business process flexibility with the help of invariants. Software Process Improvement and Practice, 12:65–79, 2007.
  23. G. Regev and A. Wegmann. Business process flexibility: Weick's organizational theory to the rescue. In Proceedings of the 7th Workshop on Business Process Modelling, Development and Support(BPMDS'06), 2006.
  24. Shweta Tayade, Dr. V Chavan, 2011: Challenges in Flexible Workflow Architecture: A Review. 2011 Fourth International Conference on Emerging Trends in Engineering & Technology, 2011 – ICETET Pages: 39-42 , DOI: 10. 1109/ICETET. 2011. 64
  25. Shweta M. Tayade and Vinay Chavan, "Roles of Flexibility in Workflow Engineering," International Journal of Modeling and Optimization vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 644-647, 2012.
  26. WfMC-TC-1003 v1. 1 (1995), V 1. 1. Workflow Reference Model, January 1995.
  27. Jennings, N. , Sycara, K. , and Wooldridge, W. "A roadmap of agent research and development," Autonomous Agents and Multi Agent Systems, Vol 1,No 1, July 1998.
  28. Joshi, H. and Singh, M: "Multiagent Systems on the net", Communications of the ACM, Vol 42, No 3, 1999.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Workflow Business Process Engineering Flexibility change management Intelligent agent

Powered by PhDFocusTM