CFP last date
20 May 2024
Reseach Article

An Insight upon the Effect of Quality Assurance on the Cost of Software Development

by Deepika Manchanda, Akashdeep Singh, Neha Garg
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 80 - Number 13
Year of Publication: 2013
Authors: Deepika Manchanda, Akashdeep Singh, Neha Garg
10.5120/13919-1751

Deepika Manchanda, Akashdeep Singh, Neha Garg . An Insight upon the Effect of Quality Assurance on the Cost of Software Development. International Journal of Computer Applications. 80, 13 ( October 2013), 4-10. DOI=10.5120/13919-1751

@article{ 10.5120/13919-1751,
author = { Deepika Manchanda, Akashdeep Singh, Neha Garg },
title = { An Insight upon the Effect of Quality Assurance on the Cost of Software Development },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { October 2013 },
volume = { 80 },
number = { 13 },
month = { October },
year = { 2013 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 4-10 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume80/number13/13919-1751/ },
doi = { 10.5120/13919-1751 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T21:54:53.512608+05:30
%A Deepika Manchanda
%A Akashdeep Singh
%A Neha Garg
%T An Insight upon the Effect of Quality Assurance on the Cost of Software Development
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 80
%N 13
%P 4-10
%D 2013
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

The requirement of a software to be free from any kind of error,defect or fault is still a very big challenge to the IT industry. Software system's size, lifetime and complexity is continuously growing but there is often not much flexibility to deadlines and budget. Also,cost is the main factor which should be considered before developing a software project. A possible software failure may lead to millions of breakdown costs, loss of reputation, or even injure people. But,when this is done correctly,it helps in the successful completion of the project. This paper focusses on providing an insight upon finding the right balance between quality and quality assurance costs during different phases of software development life cycle which in turn would increase organizational economic status, as well as conceptual and economic perspective.

References
  1. Ben-Jacob, R. , Kenett, R. S. , Lum, S. , Urkin, E. , & Yu, L. W. (2011) Site seeing. Quality
  2. Charette, R. N. (2005). Why software fails. IEEE Spectrum, 42(9), 42–49.
  3. Crandall, R. E. , & Julien, O. (2010). Measuring the cost of quality. Industrial Management,52(4), 14-18.
  4. Eckhardt, D. E. , Caglayan, A. K. , Kelly, J. P. J. , Knight, J. C. ,Lee, L. D. , McAllister, D. F. , and Vouk, M. A. An experimental evaluation of software redundancy as a strategy for improving reliability, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, Vol. 17, No. 7, 1991, pp. 692-702.
  5. Economics of Software Verification,Gerard J. Holzmann,Bell Laboratories MH 2C-521,600,Mountain Avenue Murray Hill, NJ 07974.
  6. Ewusi-mensah, K. (1997). Critical issues in abandoned information systems development projects. Communications of the ACM, 40(9), 74–80.
  7. Fenton, N. , and Neil, M. , A critique of software prediction models. IEEE Trans. On Software Engineering, Vol. , 25.
  8. Feigenbaum, A. V. (2008). Raising the bar. Quality Progress, 41(7), 22-27.
  9. Hecht, H. , and Wallace, D. , Towards more effective testing for high assurance systems. Proc. High Assurance Systems Engineering Conf. , Washington, DC, August 1997.
  10. Hardgrave, B. C. , Davis, F. D. , & Riemenschneider, C. K. (2003). Investigating determinants of software developers' intentions to follow methodologies. Journal of Management Information Systems, 20(1), 123.
  11. Hutcheson, M. L. (2003). Software testing fundamentals: Methods and metrics. New York: Wiley.
  12. West, C. H. , Protocol validation in complex systems. Proc. 8th ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing,1989, pp. 303-312.
  13. . ISO/IEC: ISO/IEC 9126-1:2001 Software engineering - Product quality - Part 1:Quality model. International Standards Organization,Geneva, Switzerland (2001).
  14. Jaju, S. B. , & Lakhe, R. R. (2009b). Tracing quality cost in a luggage manufacturing industry. Proceedings of World Academy of Science: Engineering & Technology, 4(9), 546-549.
  15. James Herbaleb,Anita Carleton, James Rozum, Jane Siegel ,David Zubrow"Benefits of CMM-Based Software Process Improvement:Initial Results", Software Engineering Institute,Technical Report,CMU/SEI-94-TR-13ESC-TR-94-013,(1994)August,pp. 25-26. .
  16. Konieczny,T. (2012). A closer look:Understanding risk management for medical device manufacturers. QualityMagazine,51(1),48-51. Progress,44(9),17-25.
  17. Kwai-Sang,C. ,Lian-Yu, Z. ,& Li,W. (2003). A hybrid rough-cut process planning for quality. International Journal of Advanced Manufactoring Technology,22(9/10),733-743. doi:10. 1007/s00170-003-1618-x.
  18. Lopez, D. A. (1996). Quality planning in aerospace manufacturing. Total Quality Management,7(3), 249-256. ftwarsoft
  19. Michaels, P. (2007). Calculating the cost of failed software projects.
  20. Pfleeger, S . L. (1999). Understanding and improving technology transfer in software engineering. Journal of Systems and Software, 47(2–3), 111–124.
  21. Schenk, K. D. , Vitalari, N. P. , & Davis, K. S. (1998). Differences between novice and expert systems analysts: What do we know and what do we do? Journal of Management Information Systems, 15(1), 9–50.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Cost Quality SDLC(Software Development Life Cycle).