CFP last date
20 May 2024
Call for Paper
June Edition
IJCA solicits high quality original research papers for the upcoming June edition of the journal. The last date of research paper submission is 20 May 2024

Submit your paper
Know more
The week's pick
Responsive image
Enhancing Privacy Preservation: Multi-Attribute Protection with P-Sensitive K-Anonymity

Twinkle Patel Kiran Amin
Random Articles
Reseach Article

Comparative Study of Principal Component Analysis and Independent Component Analysis

by Sushma Niket Borade, Ratnadeep R. Deshmukh
journal cover thumbnail

International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 92 - Number 15
Year of Publication: 2014
Authors: Sushma Niket Borade, Ratnadeep R. Deshmukh
10.5120/16087-5399

Sushma Niket Borade, Ratnadeep R. Deshmukh . Comparative Study of Principal Component Analysis and Independent Component Analysis. International Journal of Computer Applications. 92, 15 ( April 2014), 45-49. DOI=10.5120/16087-5399

@article{ 10.5120/16087-5399,
author = { Sushma Niket Borade, Ratnadeep R. Deshmukh },
title = { Comparative Study of Principal Component Analysis and Independent Component Analysis },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { April 2014 },
volume = { 92 },
number = { 15 },
month = { April },
year = { 2014 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 45-49 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume92/number15/16087-5399/ },
doi = { 10.5120/16087-5399 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T22:14:25.127780+05:30
%A Sushma Niket Borade
%A Ratnadeep R. Deshmukh
%T Comparative Study of Principal Component Analysis and Independent Component Analysis
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 92
%N 15
%P 45-49
%D 2014
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

Face recognition is emerging as an active research area with numerous commercial and law enforcement applications. This paper presents comparative analysis of two most popular subspace projection techniques for face recognition. It compares Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and Independent Component Analysis (ICA), as implemented by the InfoMax algorithm. ORL face database is used for training and testing of the system. The results show that for the task of face recognition, ICA outperforms PCA in terms of recognition rate and subspace dimensionality.

References
  1. Zhao, W. , Chellappa, R. , and Phillips, A. 2003. Face recognition in still and video images: a literature survey, ACM Comput. Surv. 35 (Dec. 2003), 399-458.
  2. Brunelli, R. and Poggio, T. 1993. Face recognition: features versus templates. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intell. 15 (Oct. 1993), 1042-1052.
  3. Turk, M. and Pentland, A. 1991. Eigenfaces for recognition. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 3 (1991), 71-86.
  4. Turk, M. and Pentland, A. 1991. Face recognition using eigenfaces. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.
  5. Bartlett, M. S. , Movellan, J. R. , and Sejnowski, T. J. 2002. Face Recognition by Independent Component Analysis. IEEE Trans. Neural Networks. 13 (Nov. 2002), 1450-1464.
  6. Liu, C. and Wechsler, H. 1999. Comparative assessment of Independent Component Analysis (ICA) for face recognition. Int. Conference on Audio and Video Based Biometric Person Authentication, Washington D. C. USA.
  7. Barlett, M. S. , Lades, H. M. , and Sejnowski, T. J. 1998. Independent component representations for face recognition. In Proceedings of the SPIE Symposium on Electronic Imaging: Science and Technology Conference on Human Vision and Electronic Imaging III, San Jose, California.
  8. Yuen, P. C. and Lai, J. H. 2000. Independent Component Analysis of face images. IEEE Workshop on Biologically Motivated Computer Vision, Seoul.
  9. Baek, K. , Draper, B. A. , Beveridge, J. R. , and She, K. 2002. PCA vs ICA: A comparison on the FERET data set. Joint Conference on Information Sciences, Durham, NC.
  10. Moghaddam, B. 2002. Principal manifolds and probabilistic subspaces for visual recognition. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intell. 24 (June 2002). 780-788.
  11. Jin, Z. and Davoine, F. 2004. Orthogonal ICA representation of images. In Proceedings of the 8th Int. Conference on Control, Automation, Robotics and Vision.
  12. Socolinsky, D. and Selinger, A. 2002. A comparative analysis of face recognition performance with visible and thermal infrared imagery. In Proceedings of the Int. Conference on Pattern Recognition, Quebec City.
  13. Draper, B. A. , Baek, K. , Bartlett, M. S. , and Beveridge, J. R. 2003. Recognizing faces with PCA and ICA. J. Computer vision and image understanding, Special issue on Face Recognition. 91 (July 2003), 115-137.
  14. Sirovich, L. and Kirby, M. 1987. Low-dimensional procedure for the characterization of human faces. J. Optical Society of America. 4 (Mar. 1987), 519-524.
  15. Kirby, M. and Sirovich, L. 1990. Application of the Karhunen-Loeve procedure for the characterization of human faces. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intell. 12 (Jan. 1990), 103-108.
  16. Hyvarinen, A. and Oja, E. 2000. Independent Component Analysis: algorithms and applications. J. Neural Networks. 13 (June 2000), 411-430.
  17. Bell, A. J. and Sejnowski, T. J. 1995. Fast blind separation based on information theory. In Proceedings of the Int. Symposium on Non-linear Theory and Applications, Las Vegas.
  18. Bell, A. and Sejnowski, T. 1995. An information-maximization approach to blind separation and blind deconvolution. J. Neural Computation. 7 (Nov. 1995), 1004-1034.
  19. http://www. cl. cam. ac. uk/research/dtg/attarchive/facedatabase. html.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Face recognition PCA ICA subspace analysis methods.

Powered by PhDFocusTM