CFP last date
22 April 2024
Reseach Article

Statistical Properties of Kumaraswamy-Generalized Exponentiated Exponential Distribution

by B. E. Mohammed
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 94 - Number 4
Year of Publication: 2014
Authors: B. E. Mohammed
10.5120/16328-5602

B. E. Mohammed . Statistical Properties of Kumaraswamy-Generalized Exponentiated Exponential Distribution. International Journal of Computer Applications. 94, 4 ( May 2014), 1-8. DOI=10.5120/16328-5602

@article{ 10.5120/16328-5602,
author = { B. E. Mohammed },
title = { Statistical Properties of Kumaraswamy-Generalized Exponentiated Exponential Distribution },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { May 2014 },
volume = { 94 },
number = { 4 },
month = { May },
year = { 2014 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 1-8 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume94/number4/16328-5602/ },
doi = { 10.5120/16328-5602 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T22:16:40.467835+05:30
%A B. E. Mohammed
%T Statistical Properties of Kumaraswamy-Generalized Exponentiated Exponential Distribution
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 94
%N 4
%P 1-8
%D 2014
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

In this paper, we present a new class of distributions called kumaraswamy Generalized Exponentiated Exponential Distribution, that is based upon the cumulative distribution function of Kumaraswamy (1980) distribution, which is more flexible and is a natural generalization of the exponential, Exponentiated Exponential and kumaraswamy Generalized exponential distributions as special cases found in literature. Also, the analytical shapes of the corresponding probability density function and hazard rate function are derived with graphical illustrations. Expressions for the r^thmoments are calculated and the variation of the skewness and kurtosis measures is investigated. Likelihood estimators of the parameters are derived. Moreover, analysis of real data set, representing the breaking stress of carbon fibers, is conducted to demonstrate the usefulness of the proposed distribution.

References
  1. Ahuja, J. C. and Nash, S. W. 1967 The generalized Gompertz-Verhulst family of distributions. Sankhya, Series A. 29, 141-156.
  2. Akaike, H. 1969 Fitting Autoregressive Models for Prediction. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, 21, 243-247.
  3. Bozdogan, H. 1987 Model selection and Akaike's information criterion (AIC): The general theory and its analytical extensions. Psychometrika, 52, 345-370.
  4. Cordeiro, G. M. and Castro, M. 2011 A new family of generalized distributions. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation 81, 883-898.
  5. Cordeiro, G. M. , Ortega, E. M. and Nadarajah, S. 2010 The Kumaraswamy Weibull distribution. Journal of the Franklin Institute 347, 1399-1429.
  6. Gupta, R. D. and Kundu, D. 1999 Generalized Exponential Distributions. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Statistics. 41, 173-188.
  7. Gupta, R. D. 2001 Exponentiated Exponential Family; An Alternative to Gamma and Weibull. Biometrical Journal. 33, 117-130.
  8. Gupta, R. D. and Kundu, D. 2001 Generalized Exponential Distributions: Different Methods of Estimation. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation. 69, 315-338.
  9. Gupta, R. D. and Kundu, D. 2003 Discriminating Between the Weibull and the GE Distributions. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis. 43, 179-196.
  10. Gupta, R. D. and Kundu, D. 2004 Discriminating Between the Gamma and Generalized Exponential Distributions. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation. 74, 107-121.
  11. Gupta, R. D. and Kundu, D. 2007 Generalized exponential distribution: existing methods and recent developments. Journal of the Statistical Planning and Inference. 137, 3537--3547.
  12. Kaplan, E. L. and Meier, P. (1958). Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 53, 457--481.
  13. Kenney, J. F. and Keeping, E. S. 1962 Mathematics of Statistics (3rd ed. ), Part 1. New Jersey.
  14. Kumaraswamy, P. 1980 Generalized probability density function for double bounded random processes. Journal of Hydrology. 462, 79-- 88.
  15. Moors, J. J. 1988 A quantile alternative for kurtosis. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society D, 37, 25-32.
  16. Nadarajah, S. , Cordeiro, G. M. , and Ortega. E. M. 2012 General results for the Kumaraswamy-G distribution. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation. 82, 951--979.
  17. Ross, S. M. 1996 Stochastic processes, 2nd ed. , New York: Wiley.
  18. Schwarz, G. 1978 Estimating the Dimension of a Model. Annals of Statistics 6, 461-464.
  19. Venkatesan, P. and Sundaram, N. 2011 Exponentiated exponential models for survival data. Indian Journal of Science and Technology. 4, 923-930.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Kumaraswamy Distribution Maximum likelihood estimation Akaike information criterion Baysian information criterion Consistent Akaike Information Criteria Kaplan-Meier estimator likelihood ratio test p-p plot.