Call for Paper - March 2020 Edition
IJCA solicits original research papers for the March 2020 Edition. Last date of manuscript submission is February 20, 2020. Read More

A novel teaching-learning strategy for teamwork based on agreement technologies

Print
PDF
Design and Evaluation of Digital Content for Education
© 2011 by IJCA Journal
Number 1 - Article 5
Year of Publication: 2011
Authors:
Sergio Pajares
Victor Sánchez-Anguix
Alejandro Torreño
Sergio Esparcia

Sergio Pajares, Victor Sanchez-Anguix, Alejandro Torreno and Sergio Esparcia. A novel teaching-learning strategy for teamwork based on agreement technologies. IJCA Proceedings on Design and Evaluation of Digital Content for Education (DEDCE) (1):21–30, 2011. Full text available. BibTeX

@article{key:article,
	author = {Sergio Pajares and Victor Sanchez-Anguix and Alejandro Torreno and Sergio Esparcia},
	title = {A novel teaching-learning strategy for teamwork based on agreement technologies},
	journal = {IJCA Proceedings on Design and Evaluation of Digital Content for Education (DEDCE)},
	year = {2011},
	number = {1},
	pages = {21--30},
	note = {Full text available}
}

Abstract

The new framework introduced by the European Space for Higher Education entails the reformulation of teaching strategies, which must not only be based on the teaching process, but also on the learning process. Given the importance of teamwork in nowadays’ engineering labour market, we propose a teaching-learning strategy, which applies a competency-based education approach and aims to reinforce the generic teamwork competence. Its foundations are drawn from the research on agreement technologies and multi-agent systems, which are key research topics in the field of Artificial Intelligence.

Reference

  • Perrenaud, P., Noreste, E., and Sáez, J.C. 1999. Construir competencias desde la escuela. Santiago de Chile, Dolmen Ediciones.
  • Chappell, C., Gonczi, A., and Hager, P. 2000. Competency-based education. National Centre for Vocational Education Research (NCVER).
  • Johnson, D.W., Johnson, R.T., and Smith, K. 2007. The state of cooperative learning in postsecondary and professional settings. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 19(1), 15-29.
  • Slavin, R.E. 1980. Cooperative Learning. Review of Educational Research. 50(2), 315-342.
  • Wooldridge, M.J. 2009. An introduction to multiagent systems. Wiley.
  • Ferber, J. 1999. Multi-agent Systems: An Introduction to Distributed Artificial Intelligence. Addison Wesley Longman.
  • Russell, S., and Norvig, P. 2003. Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach. Pearson Education.
  • Guitert, M., Romeu, T., and Pérez-Mateo, M. 2007. Competencias TIC y trabajo en equipo en entornos virtuales. Revista de Universidad y Sociedad del Conocimiento, 4(1).
  • Stahl, G., Koschmann, T., and Suthers, D. 2006. Computer-supported collaborative learning: An historical perspective. Cambridge University Press.
  • Busquets Mataix, J., Roldán Martínez, D., Martínez Naharro, S., del Blanco Orobitg, D. 2006. PoliformaT: una estrategia para la formación on-line en la Educación Superior. In Proceedings of the Virtual Educa 2006.
  • Mengod, R. 2006. PoliformaT, the Sakai-based on-line campus for UPV – history of a success. In Proceedings of the 5th Sakai Conference.
  • White, A. 2005. Introducing the Sakai Community. In Proceedings of the 4th Sakai Conference.
  • Sierra, C., Botti, V., and Ossowski, S. 2011. Agreement computing. Künstliche Intelligenz, 25(1), 57-61.
  • Botti, V., Garrido, A., Gimeno, J.A., Giret, A., Igual, F., and Noriega, P. 2010. An Electronic Institution for Simulating Water-Right Markets. In Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Agreement Technologies, 3-18.
  • Centeno, R., Fagundes, M., Billhardt, H., Ossowski, S., Corchado, J.M., Julián, V., and Fernandez, A. 2009. An Organization-based Multiagent System for Medical Emergency Assistance. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science, volume 5517/2009, 561-568.
  • Sánchez-Anguix, V., Julian, V., Botti, V., and García-Fornes, A. 2011. Analyzing Intra-Team Strategies for Agent-Based Negotiation Teams. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, 929-936.
  • Jennings, N.R., Faratin, P., Lomuscio, A.R., Parsons, S., Wooldridge, M.J., and Sierra, C. 2001. Automated negotiation: Prospects, methods and challenges. Group Decision and Negotiation, 10(2), 199-215.
  • Pardo, P., Pajares, S., Onaindía, E., Godo, L., and Dellunde, P. 2011. Multiagent Argumentation for Cooperative Planning in DeLP-POP. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, 971-978.
  • Rahwan, I., Ramchurn, S.D., Jennings, N.R., McBurney, P., Parsons, S., and Sonenberg, L. 2003. Argumentation-based negotiation. The Knowledge Engineering Review, 18:4, 343-375.
  • Onaindía, E., Sapena, O., and Torreño, A. 2010. Cooperative Distributed Planning through Argumentation. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence, 4(S10), 118-136.
  • Rintanen, J., and Hoffmann, J. 2001. An Overview of Recent Algorithms for AI Planning. Künstliche Intelligenz, Volume 2/01, 5-11.
  • Esparcia, S., and Argente, E. 2011. Formalizing Virtual Organizations. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Agents and Artificial Intelligence, volume 2, 84-93, SciTePress.
  • Ferber, J., Gutknecht, O., and Michel, F. 2003. From agents to organizations: an organizational view of multi-agent systems. Agent-Oriented Software Engineering IV, 443-459, Springer.
  • Criado, N., Julian, V., Botti, V., and Argente, E. 2010. A Norm-based Organization Management System. In Coordination, Organizations, Institutions, and Norms in Agent Systems V, volume 6069, 19-35, Springer.
  • Boella, G., van der Torre, L., and Verhagen, H. 2006. Introduction to normative multiagent systems. Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, volume 12(2-3), 71-79.
  • Sabater, J., and Sierra, C. 2005. Review on computational trust and reputation models. Artificial Intelligence Review, 24(1), 33-60.
  • Chou, C., Chan, T., and Lin, C. 2003. Redefining the learning companion: the past, present, and future of educational agents. Comput. Educ., 40(3), 255-269.
  • Norman, T.J., and Jennings, N.R. 2002. Constructing a virtual training laboratory using intelligent agents. International Journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Life Long Learning, 12(1), 201-213.
  • Sklar, E., Davies, M., and Co, M.S.T. 2004. SimEd: Simulating Education as a Multi Agent System. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, volume 4, 998-1005.
  • van der Vegt, G.S., and Bunderson, J.S. 2005. Learning and performance in multidisciplinary teams: The importance of collective team identification, The Academy of Management Journal, 48(3), 532-547.
  • Zuo, J., Pullen, S., and Birchmore, R. 2008. The use of a learning contract in higher education-a case study. AUBEA and Unitec.
  • Isaksen, S.G., and Gaulin, J.P. 2005. A reexamination of brainstorming research: Implications for research and practice. Gifted Child Quarterly, 49(4), 315-329, Sage Publications.
  • Nurmi, H. 2010. Voting Systems for Social Choice. Handbook of Group Decision and Negotiation, 4(2), 167-182, Springer.
  • Neary, M. 2000. Supporting students’ learning and professional development through the process of continuous assessment and mentorship. Nurse Education Today, 20(6), 463-474.
  • Thomas, L., Nutt, C., and Wall, T. 2009. Personal tutoring and academic advising: improving student success. Widening Participation and Lifelong Learning, 11(3), 2-5.
  • Mamary, E.M., and Charles, P. 2000. On-site to on-line: Barriers to the use of computers for continuing education. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 20(3), 171-175.
  • Menchaca, M.P., and Bekele, T.A. 2008. Learner and instructor identified success factors in distance education. Distance Education, 29(3), 231-252.
  • Turban, E., and Aronson, J.E. 2000. Decision support systems and intelligent systems. Decision support systems and intelligent systems, Prentice Hall PTR.
  • Garrido, A., Onaindia, E., and Sapena, O. 2009. Automated planning for personalized course composition. In Proceedings of the 9th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, 178-182.
  • Garrido, A., Fernandez, S., Morales, L., Onaindia, E., Borrajo, D., and Castillo, L. 2010. On the automatic compilation of e-learning models to planning. The Knowledge Engineering Review, 00(0), 1-24.
  • Bernad, J.A. 2001. Modelo cognitivo de evaluación educativa. Narcea.
  • Delgado, A.M., and Cuello, R.O. 2006. La evaluación continua en un nuevo escenario docente. Revista de Universidad y Sociedad del Conocimiento, 3(1), 1-13.
  • Katzenbach, J.R., Smith, D.K., and Bookspan, M. 1993. The wisdom of teams. Harvard Business School Press.
  • Temperini, M., and Sterbni, A. 2008. Learning from peers: motivating students through reputation systems. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Applications and the Internet, 305-308.
  • Voss, M. 2004. Privacy preserving online reputation systems. Information Security Management. Education and Privacy, 249-264.
  • Hoffmann, J. 2001. FF: The Fast-Forward Planning System. AI Magazine, 22(3), 57-62.
  • Barootchi, N., Keshavarz, M.H. 2001. Assessment of achievement through portfolios and teacher-made tests. Educational Research, 44(3), 279-288.
  • Friend, M., and Bursuck, W. 1996. Including Students with Special Needs: A Practical Guide for Classroom Teachers. Prentice Hall.
  • Beldarrain, Y. 2006. Distance education trends: Integrating new technologies to foster student interaction and collaboration. Distance Education, 27(2), 139-153.
  • Fellers, J.W. 1996. Teaching teamwork: exploring the use of cooperative learning teams in information systems education. ACM SIGMIS, 27(2), 44-60.
  • Veerman, A., Andriessen, J., and Kanselaar, G. 2002. Collaborative argumentation in academic education. Instructional Science, 30(3), 155-186.
  • Deibel, K. 2005. Team formation methods for increasing interaction during in-class group work. ACM SIGCSE, 37(3), 291-295.