CFP last date
20 May 2024
Reseach Article

Leader Culling Using AHP � PROMETHEE Methodology

Published on March 2012 by Vandana Bagla, Anjana Gupta, Bhavna Sharma
International Conference in Computational Intelligence
Foundation of Computer Science USA
ICCIA - Number 2
March 2012
Authors: Vandana Bagla, Anjana Gupta, Bhavna Sharma
21965213-4f3b-4718-9fd1-e08eae52f324

Vandana Bagla, Anjana Gupta, Bhavna Sharma . Leader Culling Using AHP � PROMETHEE Methodology. International Conference in Computational Intelligence. ICCIA, 2 (March 2012), 5-12.

@article{
author = { Vandana Bagla, Anjana Gupta, Bhavna Sharma },
title = { Leader Culling Using AHP � PROMETHEE Methodology },
journal = { International Conference in Computational Intelligence },
issue_date = { March 2012 },
volume = { ICCIA },
number = { 2 },
month = { March },
year = { 2012 },
issn = 0975-8887,
pages = { 5-12 },
numpages = 8,
url = { /proceedings/iccia/number2/5098-1010/ },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Proceeding Article
%1 International Conference in Computational Intelligence
%A Vandana Bagla
%A Anjana Gupta
%A Bhavna Sharma
%T Leader Culling Using AHP � PROMETHEE Methodology
%J International Conference in Computational Intelligence
%@ 0975-8887
%V ICCIA
%N 2
%P 5-12
%D 2012
%I International Journal of Computer Applications
Abstract

The candidate selection process involves thoughtful empirical decisions which determine the best fit from a pool of contesting candidates. A wide range of criteria is used to assess the candidates. This paper utilizes an improved PROMETHEE II (Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment Evaluation) methodology which efficiently establishes its applicability and potentiality to solve such types of decision-making problems with multiple conflicting criteria and alternatives. The employed methodology utilizes systematic approach to screen and ultimately select the most suitable candidate. The factors considered here explore personal as well as professional aspects of the aspiring candidates.

References
  1. Albadvi A., Chaharsooghi S.K., Esfahanipour A. 2007. Decision making in stock trading, An application of PROMETHEE. European Journal of Operati o nal Research, 177:673 -683.
  2. Babic Z., Plazibat N. 1998. Ranking of enterprises based on multi criteria analysis. International Journal of Production Economics, 29-35,56 -57.
  3. Ball V.C., Noel J. and Srinivasan 1994. Using the analytic hierarchy process in house selection. Journal of Real Estate Finance And Economi cs, vol. 9, pp. 69-85.
  4. Bouri A., Martel J.M. 2002. A multi-criterion approach for selecting attractive portfolio. Journal of Multi- criteria Decision Analysis , 11: 269-277.
  5. Brans J.P., Vincke Ph., Mareschal B. 1986. How to select and how to rank projects, the promethee method. European Journal of Operati onal Research, 24(2): 228-238.
  6. Bryson N. and Mobolurin A. 1994. An approach to using the analytic hierarchy process for solving multiple criteria decision making problems, European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 76, pp. 440-454.
  7. Lunging F. 1992. Analytical hierarchy in transportation problems, an application for Istanbul, Urban Trans- portation Congress of Istanbul, vol. 2, pp. 16-18.
  8. Mareschal B. 1998. Weight stability intervals in multicriteria decision aid, EJOR, 33, pp.54-64.
  9. Mareschal B., Brans J.P. 1988. Geometrical Representation for MCDM, the GAIA procedure, EJOR, 34, pp. 69-77 .
  10. Mareschal B., Brans J.P. 1991. BANKADVISER, An industrial evaluation system. European Journal of Oper- ational Research, 54: 318-324.
  11. Saaty T.L. 1980. The Analytic Hierarchy Process , McGraw Hill.
  12. Vrangel S., Stanojevic M., Stevanovic V., Luein M. 1996. INVEX, Investment advisory expert system. Expert Systems
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) PROMETHEE (Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment Evaluation) Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM)