CFP last date
22 April 2024
Reseach Article

Evaluating the Performance of TCP and CBR in Tree-Based and Mesh-based ad-hoc Multicast Routing Protocol

Published on None 2011 by V.V.Mandhare, P.S.Vikhe, N.S.Nehe
journal_cover_thumbnail
International Conference and Workshop on Emerging Trends in Technology
Foundation of Computer Science USA
ICWET - Number 6
None 2011
Authors: V.V.Mandhare, P.S.Vikhe, N.S.Nehe
ba3b4c04-5e87-4044-870d-b57fc8e525eb

V.V.Mandhare, P.S.Vikhe, N.S.Nehe . Evaluating the Performance of TCP and CBR in Tree-Based and Mesh-based ad-hoc Multicast Routing Protocol. International Conference and Workshop on Emerging Trends in Technology. ICWET, 6 (None 2011), 12-18.

@article{
author = { V.V.Mandhare, P.S.Vikhe, N.S.Nehe },
title = { Evaluating the Performance of TCP and CBR in Tree-Based and Mesh-based ad-hoc Multicast Routing Protocol },
journal = { International Conference and Workshop on Emerging Trends in Technology },
issue_date = { None 2011 },
volume = { ICWET },
number = { 6 },
month = { None },
year = { 2011 },
issn = 0975-8887,
pages = { 12-18 },
numpages = 7,
url = { /proceedings/icwet/number6/2109-ce165/ },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Proceeding Article
%1 International Conference and Workshop on Emerging Trends in Technology
%A V.V.Mandhare
%A P.S.Vikhe
%A N.S.Nehe
%T Evaluating the Performance of TCP and CBR in Tree-Based and Mesh-based ad-hoc Multicast Routing Protocol
%J International Conference and Workshop on Emerging Trends in Technology
%@ 0975-8887
%V ICWET
%N 6
%P 12-18
%D 2011
%I International Journal of Computer Applications
Abstract

This paper, evaluates the performance of two ad-hoc multicast routing protocols under varying traffic, density and mobility conditions. We observe that a large fraction of the traffic is being carried on the Internet today by TCP. Thus internet traffic has inherently different characteristics than CBR traffic, which is commonly used traffic type for evaluating MANET routing protocols performance. Previous efforts to evaluate performance of TCP and CBR in tree-based multicast routing protocol (MAODV) are done. But these tree based protocols face lot of problem like single path property, vulnerable to high mobility and large group, single point of failure which are removed in mesh-based multicast routing protocol like ODMRP, ADMR etc. It is observe that mesh based protocol are robust enough and performance of CBR is more in mesh based protocol as compare to TCP.

References
  1. C.Siva Ram Murthy and B.S.Manoj, “Ad-Hoc Wireless Network”, Pearson Education,2003
  2. Elizabeth M. Royer, Charles E. Perkins , “ Multicast Ad-hoc On-Demand Distance Vector (MAODV) Routing”, “Multi-cast Protocol for Ad Hoc Wireless Network’s draft-ietf-manet-maodv-00.txt, 15 July 2000A
  3. Elizabeth M. Royer and Charles E. Perkins, “Multicast Operation of the A-hoc On-Demand Distance Vector Routing Protocol” , In Proc. of the 5th annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (MobiCom), pp 207 - 218, August 1999.
  4. Network simulator ns-2.26 and ns-2.1b8 and ns2 manual and notes, www.ns.org
  5. Subir Kumar Sarkar, T G Basavaraju,C Puttamadappa “Ad Hoc Mobile Wireless Net-works”, Auerbach Publication.
  6. S.R. Das, R. Castaneda, J. Yan, and R. Sengupta. “Comparative performance evaluation of routing protocols for mobile, ad-hoc networks.” ” In 7th Int. Conf. on Computer Communications and Networks (IC3N)”, pp 153–161, October 1998.
  7. Warodom Wearpun, Krit Thavornvisit “Performance Comparison of TCP and CBR in MAODV", IEEE journal, vol. 3, pp 987 - 993, September 2007
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Ad-hoc multicast routing protocol tree base mesh base MAODV ODMRP MANET