CFP last date
22 April 2024
Reseach Article

Software Change Effort Estimation at Design Level using Flow Chart

Published on September 2016 by Priyadarshini, Sushant, Aprna Tripathi
National Conference on Advances in Computing Applications
Foundation of Computer Science USA
NCACA2016 - Number 2
September 2016
Authors: Priyadarshini, Sushant, Aprna Tripathi
5fb6242c-7b8a-4724-b933-13bf992c9f61

Priyadarshini, Sushant, Aprna Tripathi . Software Change Effort Estimation at Design Level using Flow Chart. National Conference on Advances in Computing Applications. NCACA2016, 2 (September 2016), 15-18.

@article{
author = { Priyadarshini, Sushant, Aprna Tripathi },
title = { Software Change Effort Estimation at Design Level using Flow Chart },
journal = { National Conference on Advances in Computing Applications },
issue_date = { September 2016 },
volume = { NCACA2016 },
number = { 2 },
month = { September },
year = { 2016 },
issn = 0975-8887,
pages = { 15-18 },
numpages = 4,
url = { /proceedings/ncaca2016/number2/26177-1045/ },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Proceeding Article
%1 National Conference on Advances in Computing Applications
%A Priyadarshini
%A Sushant
%A Aprna Tripathi
%T Software Change Effort Estimation at Design Level using Flow Chart
%J National Conference on Advances in Computing Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V NCACA2016
%N 2
%P 15-18
%D 2016
%I International Journal of Computer Applications
Abstract

The success of a software depends on it exact estimation of its effort, cost and duration. Most of the software fails just because of wrong estimation. Efficient Cost and effort estimation at early stages of software development is one of the big challenges for software engineers as well as software scientists. There are a number of estimation metrics to estimate effort but the metrics to estimate cost of software change in early phases of software development is rare. In this paper, we are proposing a metric to estimate the effort of software change at design level using flow chart. The results are analyzed with ten flow charts of various program of length 50-200 line of codes. Also results are compared with existing metrics.

References
  1. Bowman, M. , Debray, S. K. , and Peterson, L. L. 1993. Reasoning about naming systems.
  2. Ding, W. and Marchionini, G. 1997 A Study on Video Browsing Strategies. Technical Report. University of Maryland at College Park.
  3. Fröhlich, B. and Plate, J. 2000. The cubic mouse: a new device for three-dimensional input. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
  4. Tavel, P. 2007 Modeling and Simulation Design. AK Peters Ltd.
  5. Sannella, M. J. 1994 Constraint Satisfaction and Debugging for Interactive User Interfaces. Doctoral Thesis. UMI Order Number: UMI Order No. GAX95-09398. , University of Washington.
  6. Forman, G. 2003. An extensive empirical study of feature selection metrics for text classification. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 3 (Mar. 2003), 1289-1305.
  7. Brown, L. D. , Hua, H. , and Gao, C. 2003. A widget framework for augmented interaction in SCAPE.
  8. Y. T. Yu, M. F. Lau, "A comparison of MC/DC, MUMCUT and several other coverage criteria for logical decisions", Journal of Systems and Software, 2005, in press.
  9. Spector, A. Z. 1989. Achieving application requirements. In Distributed Systems, S. Mullender
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Effort Cost Flow Chart Software Change