Why the flow completion time must be faster for congestion control algorithms? How the existing and newly proposed congestion control algorithms are far away from minimizing download times? And now the question remains is how to bring solution to the tough problem of reducing flow completion time in theory and practically, especially for multimedia long flows over wireless networking equipments. When internet users are downloading web page, downloading a file, sending an attachment, send/read mail, always involve the network in almost any interaction. Every user wishes to complete the transaction in the time as small as possible. Thus, each one over the internet demands smallest possible flow completion time. Nowadays, people are less concerned about network throughput, network efficiency, optimum network utility or packet drop rate or packet delivery ratio. They behave selfish wanting always to complete their flow as fast as possible. Here in this paper we are presenting the design of a newly created protocol called TCPBooster developed and suggested by us to reduce the limitations of existing congestion control protocol over wireless networks.

1. NanditaDukkipati and Nick McKeown, Why Flow-Completion Time is the Right metric for Congestion Control and why this means we need new algorithms, ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, New York, NY, USA Volume 36 Issue 1, January 2006 Pages 59 – 62
2. N. Dukkipati , Nick Mckeown, RCP-AC: Congestion Control to make flows complete quickly in any environment. in Proc. High-Speed Networking Workshop: The Terabits Challenge, IEEE INFOCOM, 2006.
3. NanditaDukkipati, YasharGanjali and Rui Zhang-Shen, Typical versus Worst Case Design in Networking, In Fourth Workshop on Hot Topics in Networks, College Park, Maryland, November 2005.
4. HamsaBalakrishnan, NanditaDukkipati, Nick McKeown and Claire J. Tomlin, Stability Analysis of Explicit Congestion Control Protocols, IEEE COMMUNICATIONS magazine, vol. X, no. X, month 2007.
5. Dino Lopez, LaurantLefevre, Congduc Pham, "Lightweight Fairness Solutions for XCP and TCP Cohabitation" in IFIP International Federation for Information Proc. Networking, 2008, LNCS – 4982, pp715-726, 2008.
6. Fesehaye, Debessay, and KlaraNahrstedt, Implementation of the Network Control Protocol using ECN Bits (eNCP), Technical report, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (UIUC), 05 2011.
7. Dukkipati, N. , Refice, T. , Cheng, Y. , Chu, J. , Herbert, T. , Agarwal, A, Jain, A. , And Sutin, N, An argument for increasing TCP?s initial congestion window, SIGCOMM Comput. Commun. Rev. 40 (June 2010), 26–33. M.
8. LufsBarreto, Susana Sargento,"TCP, XCP and RCP in Wireless Mesh Networks: An Evaluation Study", Computers and Communications (ISCC), 2010 IEEE Symposium, on 22-25 June 2010, ISSN :1530-1346, pg. 351 - 357.
9. Dr. AtulGonsai, BhargaviGoswami, "Network Simulator forEfficient Performance Parameter Testing & Evaluation" in National Journal of System and Information Technology - 2012, volume 5 Issue 1, pg. 89-105
10. Dr. Atul Gonsai, Bhargavi Goswami, "Experimental PerformanceTesting of TCP and UDP Protocol over WLAN 802. 11b and 802. 11g" Karpagam Journal of Computer Science, Volume 07, Issue 03, March April2013, pg. no. 168 to 183
11. Dr. Atul Gonsai, Bhargavi Goswami, Uditnarayan Kar "Evolution of Congestion Control Mechanisms for TCP and Non TCP Protocols"Matrix Academic International Journal of Engineering and Technology, MAIOJET, Volume 01, Issue 02, October2013
12. Dr. Atul Gonsai, Bhargavi Goswami, Uditnarayan Kar "Experimental based performance Analysis of IEEE 802. 11/g Hybrid Network" in Journal of Network and Information Security(JNIS), Volume 1 Issue 1 Pg. No. 61-66, October 2013
13. Martin Bateman, SaleemBhatti, Greg Bigwood, DevanRehunathan, ColinAllison, TristanHenderson, DimitriosMiras, "A comparison of TCP behaviour at high speeds using ns-2 and Linux", Proceedings of the 11th communications and networking simulation symposium CNS '08, SpringSim, New York, Feb 2008, Pg. No. 30-37
14. W. Stevens, "RFC 2001, TCP Slow Start, Congestion Avoidance, Fast Retransmission and Fast Recovery Algorithms, http://www. ietf. org/rfc. rfc2883. txt, July 2000
15. Kevin Fall, Sally Floyd, "Simulation-based comparisons of Tahoe, Reno and SACK TCP", Newsletter ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, Volume 26 Issue 3, July 1996 Pg. No. 5-21
16. Mohit P. Tahiliani, K. C. Shet and T. G. Basavaraju, "Comparative Study of High-Speed TCP Variants in Multi-Hop Wireless Networks "International Journal of Computer Theory and Engineering, IJCTE 2013 Vol. 5 Issue. 5 Pg. 802-806.
17. Marc Greis Tutorial for NS2, maintained and being expanded by the VINT group, http://www. isi. edu/nsnam/ns/tutorial/ :as on date 29/10/2013.
18. Lu?s Barreto, Susana Sargento,"XCP-Winf and RCP-Winf: Congestion Control Techniques For Wireless Mesh Networks", iscc, The IEEE symposium on Computers and Communications, IEEE ICC 2011 proceedings.
19. N. Dukkipati, G. Gibb, N. McKeown, and J. Zhu, "Building a RCP (rate control protocol) test network", In Proceedings of Hot Interconnects, August 2007.
20. H. Balakrishnan, N. Dukkipati, N. McKeown and C. Tomlin, "Stability Analysis of Switched Hybrid Time-Delay Systems – Analysis of the Rate Control Protocol", http://yuba. stanford. edu/rcp/, Stanford University Department of Aero/Astro Technical Report.
21. RFC: 793, Transmission Control Protocol, under Darpa Internet Program, http://www. ietf. org/rfc/rfc793. txt

Congestion Control Xcp Rcp Rcp-ac Tcp Tcpbooster Comparative Study Congestion Control Equations