CFP last date
20 May 2024
Reseach Article

Categories of Web User Behaviour Models and Information Retrieval � A Survey

Published on January 2014 by F. Mary Harin Fernandez, R. Ponnusamy
National Conference on Future Computing 2014
Foundation of Computer Science USA
NCFC2014 - Number 2
January 2014
Authors: F. Mary Harin Fernandez, R. Ponnusamy
bc09a2dd-9b94-4bd1-8f4c-ec75891619c6

F. Mary Harin Fernandez, R. Ponnusamy . Categories of Web User Behaviour Models and Information Retrieval � A Survey. National Conference on Future Computing 2014. NCFC2014, 2 (January 2014), 31-35.

@article{
author = { F. Mary Harin Fernandez, R. Ponnusamy },
title = { Categories of Web User Behaviour Models and Information Retrieval � A Survey },
journal = { National Conference on Future Computing 2014 },
issue_date = { January 2014 },
volume = { NCFC2014 },
number = { 2 },
month = { January },
year = { 2014 },
issn = 0975-8887,
pages = { 31-35 },
numpages = 5,
url = { /proceedings/ncfc2014/number2/14800-1414/ },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Proceeding Article
%1 National Conference on Future Computing 2014
%A F. Mary Harin Fernandez
%A R. Ponnusamy
%T Categories of Web User Behaviour Models and Information Retrieval � A Survey
%J National Conference on Future Computing 2014
%@ 0975-8887
%V NCFC2014
%N 2
%P 31-35
%D 2014
%I International Journal of Computer Applications
Abstract

The current challenges in the world are search and retrieve accurate information from the massive web. The general term used for searching and retrieving data from the web is 'query' and keyword-matching. The existing structure uses Personalized user information system, recommender system and wordnet ontology. The Personalized user information system used to increase the speed and required response. To extract user likings, the personalized user information system explore the acquirement of user reviews by supervising their browsing behavior. In Recommender system the people rate web pages as interesting and not interesting and it responses according to the relevant feedback. The wordnet ontology uses to retrieve information by means of Synonymy, Antonymy, Hyponymy /Hypernymy , Meronymy / Holonymy, Troponymy and Entailment

References
  1. Stuart E. Middleton, David C. De Roure and Nigel R Shadbolt, "Capturing knowledge of user preferences: ontologies in recommender systems" Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Knowledge Capture, page 100--107. New York, NY, USA, ACM, (2001).
  2. Bollacker, K. D. Lawrence, S. Giles, C. L. CiteSeer: An Autonomous Web Agent for Automatic Retrieval and Identification of Interesting Publications, Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Autonomous Agents, Minneapolis MN, USA, 1998
  3. Guarino, N. Masolo, C. Vetere, G. OntoSeek: Content-Based Access to the Web, IEEE Intelligent Systems , Vol. 14, No. 3, May/June 1999.
  4. Mladenic, D. Text-Learning and Related Intelligent Agents: A Survey, IEEE Intelligent Systems , Vol. 14, No. 4, July/August 1999.
  5. Fabian Cretton and Anne Le Calve' Generic ontology based User Model:GenOUM, SMV technical report series, No 203, Switzerland,June 2008.
  6. Alfred Kobsa and Wolfgang Wahlster, editors. User models in dialog systems. Springer-Verlag New York, Inc. , New York, NY, USA, 1989.
  7. Paul de Vrieze, Patrick van Bommel, and Theo van der Weide . A generic engine for user model based adaptation. In Proceedings of the User Interfaces for All workshop, Vienna, 2004.
  8. A. Stewart, C. Nieder, and B. Mehta. State of the art in user modelling for personalization in content, service and interaction - nsf/delos report on personalization. Technical report, Fraunhofer IPSI, Darmsadt, Germany,, 2004.
  9. Silvia Calegari and Gabriella Pasi, " Ontology-Based Information Behaviour to ImproveWeb Search" future internet, ISSN 1999-5903, PP 533-558,October 2010.
  10. Aditi Sharma," Personalised Information Access Based on Ontology and Collaborative Filtering", International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology (IJERT),Vol. 1 Issue 6, ISSN: 2278-0181, August – 2012.
  11. Mariam Daoud , Lynda Tamine, Mohand Boughanem and Bilal Chebaro," Learning Implicit User Interests Using Ontology and Search History for Personalization" WISE 2007 workshops,PP 325-336,2007.
  12. C. Bock, J. Odell: "Ontological Behavior Modeling," Journal of Object Technology, vol. 10, 2011, pages 3:1-36,2011.
  13. D. Martin, M. Paolucci, S. McIlraith, M. Burstein, M. McDermott, D. McGuinness, B. Parsia, T. Payne, M. Sabou, M. Solanki, N. Srinivasan, K. Sycara: "Bringing Semantics to Web Services: The OWL-S Approach," Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Semantic Web Services and Web Process Composition, pp. 26-42, July 2004. doi:10. 1007/b105145.
  14. R. Dumitru, U. Kellera, H. Lausena, J. de Bruijna, R. Laraa, M. Stollberga, A. Polleresa, C. Feiera, C. Busslerb, D. Fensela: "Web Service Modeling Ontology," Applied Ontology, vol. 1, pp. 77-106, 2005.
  15. A. Haller, M. Marmolowski, E. Oren, W. Gaaloul: "A Process Ontology for Business Intelligence," Digital Enterprise Research Institute, Technical Report 2008-04-1, April 2008.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Personalization Ontology Recommender System User Profiling. uml