Call for Paper - July 2019 Edition
IJCA solicits original research papers for the July 2019 Edition. Last date of manuscript submission is June 20, 2019. Read More

Performance Evaluation of H. 264 Codec

Print
PDF
IJCA Proceedings on National Conference on Innovative Paradigms in Engineering & Technology 2013
© 2013 by IJCA Journal
NCIPET2013 - Number 6
Year of Publication: 2013
Authors:
R. N. Mandavgane
N. G. Bawane

R N Mandavgane and N G Bawane. Article: Performance Evaluation of H.264 Codec. IJCA Proceedings on National Conference on Innovative Paradigms in Engineering & Technology 2013 NCIPET 2013(6):10-13, December 2013. Full text available. BibTeX

@article{key:article,
	author = {R. N. Mandavgane and N. G. Bawane},
	title = {Article: Performance Evaluation of H.264 Codec},
	journal = {IJCA Proceedings on National Conference on Innovative Paradigms in Engineering & Technology 2013},
	year = {2013},
	volume = {NCIPET 2013},
	number = {6},
	pages = {10-13},
	month = {December},
	note = {Full text available}
}

Abstract

H. 264/AVC is the most popular standard of video compression and decompression today, encapsulating all the advantages of MPEG as well as VCEG, both of them having their own independent codecs. The software used for compression and decompression is JM [Joint Video Team (JVT) of ISO/IEC MPEG & ITUT-T VCEG] version 18. 2. This paper is a study of H. 264 codec. The yuv file is first encoded to h. 264 format. Some other output files are also generated, which are useful for overall analysis of the input yuv file or sequence. These files help us to analyze parameters like PSNR, sequence parameter set, picture parameter set, information about different frames as regards slices and macroblocks. In this paper, all the three profiles (baseline, main and extended) are operated for the sequence (foreman_part_qcif. yuv) with one reference frame. A quantization parameter for the I, P and B slices is taken as 30. The graph of bitrate vs. PSNR (rate distortion curves) in all the three profiles show a striking similarity as can be seen in figures shown below.

References

  • Iain E. G. Richardson, Wiley 2003, H. 264 and MPEG 4 video compression.
  • Iain E. G. Richardson, Wiley 2010, The H. 264 advanced video compression standard.
  • Iain E. G. Richardson, Wiley 2002, Video codec design.
  • H. 264/14496-10 AVC Reference Software Manual (revised for JM 18. 0)
  • T. Wiegand, G. J. Sullivan, G. Bjontegaard, and A. Luthra, "Overview of the H. 264/AVC Video Coding Standard" IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, Vol. 13, No. 7, July 2003.
  • M. Fiedler, "Implementation of a basic H. 264/AVC Decoder" Seminar Paper, Chemnitz university of technology, June 1, 2004.
  • D. Marpe, T. Wiegand, G. J. Sullivan, "The H. 264/MPEG4 Advanced Video Coding Standard and its Applications" Standards Report.
  • Iain Richardson, "H. 264 / AVC Picture Management" VCodex, White Paper, 2011.
  • International Standard ISO/IEC 14496-10, "Part 10 Advanced Video Coding" second edition, 2004.
  • S. Wenger, M. M. Hannuksela, T. Stockhammer, M. Westerlund, D. Singer, "RTP Payload Format for H. 264 Video" February 2005.
  • R. Schafer, T. Wiegand , Heiko Schwarz, "The Emerging H. 264/AVC Standard" Heinrich Hertz Institute, Berlin, Germany.
  • MPEG 4 part 10 AVC(H. 264) Video Encoding, Scientific Atlanta, June 2005.