The week's pick
Random Articles
Reseach Article
Role of Heterosynaptic Interaction and its effect on Development of Receptive Field Structure in Primary Visual Cortex
| National Conference on Innovations and Recent Trends in Engineering and Technology |
| Foundation of Computer Science USA |
| NCIRET - Number 2 |
| November 2014 |
| Authors: R. P. Maheshwari, A. R. Garg, Anil Gupta |
| d1f39c4b-20c7-4d4a-a4ff-89a4e198fcc7 |
R. P. Maheshwari, A. R. Garg, Anil Gupta . Role of Heterosynaptic Interaction and its effect on Development of Receptive Field Structure in Primary Visual Cortex. National Conference on Innovations and Recent Trends in Engineering and Technology. NCIRET, 2 (November 2014), 10-13.
Abstract
Many modeling studies have been performed to investigate and find a specific learning mechanism suitable or responsible for the development of simple cell receptive field structure (SCRFS). In this work, it is shown that the mechanism of spike timing dependent plasticity (STDP) when combine with heterosynaptic interaction is suitable and sufficient for development of simple cell receptive field structure. Furthermore, with this study it is confirm that in the formation of simple cell receptive field structure the required temporal and spatial relationship is provided by STDP and heterosynaptic interaction respectively.
References
- Abbott, L. F, Song, S. , Miller, K. D (2000): Competitive Hebbian learning through spike-timing-dependent synaptic plasticity. Nat Neurosci 3, 919-926.
- Anil Gupta, Akhil Ranjan Garg (2011), Development of Receptive Field Structure of Simple Cell using Spike Timing Dependent Plasticity (STDP), special issue of International Journal of Computer Application (0975-8887), 13-18.
- Bi G, Poo MM (2001): Synaptic modification by correlated activity: Hebb's postulate revisited. Annu Rev Neurosci. 24: 139-166.
- Bonhoeffer T, Staiger V, Aertsen A (1989): Synaptic plasticity in rat hippocampal slice cultures: local "Hebbian" conjunction of pre- and postsynaptic stimulation leads to distributed synaptic enhancement. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 86:8113–8117.
- Brain S. Blais, Harel Z. Shouval, and Leon N. Cooper (1999), The Role of presynaptic activity in monocular deprivation: Comparison of homosynaptic and heterosynaptic mechanisms, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, Vol 96, pp 1083-1087.
- Engert F, Bonhoeffer T (1997): Synapse specificity of long-term potentiation breaks down at short distances. Nature 388: 279–284.
- Garg A. R. , Bhaumik B. , and Obermayer K. (2004): Development of a simple cell receptive field structure: A model based on hetero-synaptic interactions in Lecture Notes in Computer Science, volume 3316, 64-68. Springer-Verlag.
- K. D. Miller, D. J. C. MacKay (1994): The role of constraints in Hebbian learning Neural Comput. , 6, pp. 100–124.
- Kossel A, Bonhoeffer T Bolz J (1990) : Non-Hebbian synapses in rat visual cortex. Neuroreport I : I 15-I I 8.
- R. P. Maheshwari, Akhil Ranjan Garg (2011), The role of Constraints in the Development of Receptive Field Structure of Simple Cells using BCM Learning, special issue of International Journal of Computer Application (0975-8887), 08-12.
- Schuman, E. M. and Madison, D. V. (1994); Nitric oxide and synaptic function. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 17, 153–183.
- Sébastien Royer and Denis Paré,(2003): Conservation of total synaptic weight through balanced synaptic depression and potentiation, Nature 422, 518-522 .
- Somers DC, Nelson SB, and Sur M (1995): An emergent model of orientation selectivity in cat visual cortical simple cells. J Neurosci 15: 5448 –5465.
Index Terms
Keywords