Researchers are designing new MANET routing protocols and comparing and improving existing MANET routing protocols before any routing protocols are standardized using simulations. However, the simulation results from different research groups are not consistent with each other. This is because of a lack of consistency in MANET routing protocol models and application environments, including networking and user traffic profiles. Therefore, the simulation scenarios are not equitable for all protocols and conclusions cannot be generalized. Furthermore, it is difficult for one to choose a proper routing protocol for a given MANET application. In this paper Investigators for experimental purpose, considered 10 and 20 multiple random wireless nodes in 250mx250m terrain area and routing protocol DSR and find out the various simulation results like: Number of generated packets, sent packets, received, forward, dropped packet, Maximum and minimum generated packets size, Simulation length in seconds, number of generated bytes, number of sent bytes, number of received and forward bytes. Number of drop bytes.

1. S. Corson and J. Macker. Mobile ad hoc networking (manet). RFC 2501,IETF, January 1999.
2. David F. Bantz and Fr´ed´eric J. Bauchot. Wireless LAN Design Alternatives. IEEE Network, 8(2):43–53, March/April 1994.
3. P. de Cuetos, K.W. Ross, Optimal streaming of layered video: joint scheduling and error concealment, in: ACM Multimedia 2003, Berkeley, US, 2003, pp. 55–64
4. Minoruetoh, Takeshi Yoshimura, “Advances in Wireless Video Delivery” Proceedings of the IEEE, Vol. 93, NO. 1, January 2005
5. Shiwen Mao; Shunan Lin; Panwar, S.S.; Yao Wang; Celebi, E.; “Video Transport Over AdHoc Networks: Multistream Coding With Multipath Transport” Selected Areas in Communications, IEEE Journal on Volume 21, Issue 10, Dec. 2003 Page(s):1721 – 1737
6. ns-2 network simulator: http://www.isi.edu/nsnam/ns.
7. Microsoft office 2007
8. Elizabeth M. Royer and C-K Toh. “A Review of current Routing Protocols for Ad-hoc Mobile Wireless Networks”, IEEE Personal Communications, Vol. 6, No.2, pp. 46-55, April 1999.
9. Mobile Ad Hoc Networking Working Group – DSR, http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4728.txt.
10. A. Boukerche, “Performance comparison and analysis of ad hoc routing algorithms,”in Proc. of IEEE International Conference on Performance, Computing, and Communications, pp. 171-178, 2001.
11. J. Moy, “Link-State Rouing”, Routing in Communications Networks, Martha Steenstrup, editor, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1995, pp. 135-157.
12. G. S. Malkin and M. E. Steenstrup, “Distance-Vector Routing,” Routing in Communications Networks, Martha Steenstrup, editor, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1995, pp. 83-98.
13. D. B. Johnson, D. A. Maltz, Y. C. Hu, and J. G. Jetcheva, “The Dynamic Source Routing Protocol for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks (DSR),” Internet Engineering Task Force 208 (IETF) draft, Febuary 2002. Available at http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draftietf-manet-dsr-07.txt.
14. I. D. Aron and S. K. S. Gupta, “On the scalability of on-demand routing protocols for mobile ad hoc networks: an analytical study,” in Journal of Interconnection Networks, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 5-29, 2001.

MANET packets simulation wireless bytes.