CFP last date
20 May 2024
Reseach Article

iAGENT: A Novel and Intelligent Assistant to Personalised Search

by Sompa Malakar
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 1 - Number 1
Year of Publication: 2010
Authors: Sompa Malakar
10.5120/18-125

Sompa Malakar . iAGENT: A Novel and Intelligent Assistant to Personalised Search. International Journal of Computer Applications. 1, 1 ( February 2010), 67-72. DOI=10.5120/18-125

@article{ 10.5120/18-125,
author = { Sompa Malakar },
title = { iAGENT: A Novel and Intelligent Assistant to Personalised Search },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { February 2010 },
volume = { 1 },
number = { 1 },
month = { February },
year = { 2010 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 67-72 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume1/number1/18-125/ },
doi = { 10.5120/18-125 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T19:43:41.620544+05:30
%A Sompa Malakar
%T iAGENT: A Novel and Intelligent Assistant to Personalised Search
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 1
%N 1
%P 67-72
%D 2010
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

This paper presents a novel approach to personalised search. By constantly learning and updating user profiles to the current needs of the user, relevant results are returned. The paper puts forward the concept of “iAGENT” which is an intelligent agent that assists a user to get relevant documents by modifying the query given by the user in accordance with the web pages previously visited. iAGENT has a novel method of maintaining two kinds of profile for the user. The first profile keeps track of the pages visited by the user and the second keeps track of the pages that were not visited by the user. The second profile is an added feature of iAGENT that keeps a backup of the websites that were irrelevant at some point of time, but may be required in the future. When a request to a page from the second profile is made, the overhead of following the entire procedure of querying the search engine is avoided. Besides, both the profiles are constantly updated to keep track of the user’s current interest. Experimental results show that the iAGENT is efficient enough to personalise the search results to an appreciable degree.

References
  1. Pazzani, M., Maramatsu, J., Billsus. D., 1996, Syskill and Webert: Identifying interesting web sites. In AAAI conference, Portland 1996
  2. Liren Chen, Katia Sycara, 1998. WebMate: A personal agent for browsing and searching. International Conference on Autonomous Agents, 1998
  3. Throsten Joachims, Dayne Freitag, Tom Mitchell.1997, WebWatcher: A Tour guide for World Wide Web. Proceedings of IJCA197, August, 1997
  4. Leiberman,H.,1995, Letizia: An agent that assists web browsing. In International Joint Conference of Artificial Intelligence, Montreal, August, 1995
  5. Gerard Salton, Chris Buckley.1988, Improving Retrieval Performance by Relevance Feedback, Cornell University.88-898
  6. Mandar Mitra, Amit Singhal, and Chris Buckley. Improving automatic query expansion. In ACM SIGIR 98, Melbourne Australia, 1998. ACM
  7. Liu, F., Yu, C. and Meng, W. (2002). Personalised Web Search by mapping user queries to categories. In Proceedings of CKIM, 2002, 558-565
  8. Morita, M. and Shinoda, Y. (1994). Information filtering based on user behaviour analysis and best match text retrieval. In Proceedings of SIGIR, 1994. 272-281
  9. Pitkow, J., Schutze, H., Cass, T., Cooley, R., Turnbull, D., Edmonds, A., Adar, E and Brevel, T. (2002). Personalised Search. Communications of the ACM, 45(9): 50-55
  10. Sugiyama, K., Hatano, K. and Yoshikawa, M. (2004). Adaptive Web Search based on user profile constructed without any effort from the user. In Proceedings of WWW 2004, 675-684
  11. Gauch, S., Chafee, J. and Pretschner, A. (2004). Ontology based Personalised search and browsing. Web Intelligence and Agent Systems, 1(3-4): 219-234
  12. Katia Sycara, Anandeep Pannu, Mike Williamson, Dajun Zeng, Keih Decker. 1996, Distributed Intelligent Agents. Published in IEEE Expert, Intelligent System and their applications, Dec, 1996.
  13. Marko Balabanovic, Yoav Shaham, 1995. Learning Information Retrieval Agents: Experiments with Automated Web Browsing. Proceedings of AAAI Spring Symposium Series on Information Gathering from Heterogeneous, Distributed Environments: 13-18
  14. Peter, W., Foltz, Susan, T., Dumais. 1992, Personalised Information Delivery: An Analysis of Information filtering Methods. Published in Communications of the ACM. 35(12), 51-60, 1992
  15. Salton, G., and McGill, M.,J., 1983, Introduction to Modern Information Retrieval. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1983.
  16. Ronald Rosenfeld, 1994, Adaptive Statistical Language Modelling: A Maximum Entropy Approach, Carnegie Mellon University, Ph. D. Thesis
  17. Susan Gauch, Robert, P., Futrelle. Experiments in Automatic Word Class and Word Sense Identification for Information Retrieval. Proceedings of the Third Annual Symposium on Document Analysis and Information Retrieval.
  18. Jamie Teevan, Susan, T., Dumais, Eric Horvitz.2005, Personalising Search via Automated Analysis of Interests and Activities. SIGIR’05
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Personalization Intelligent agents User behaviour