CFP last date
20 May 2024
Call for Paper
June Edition
IJCA solicits high quality original research papers for the upcoming June edition of the journal. The last date of research paper submission is 20 May 2024

Submit your paper
Know more
The week's pick
Responsive image
Enhancing Privacy Preservation: Multi-Attribute Protection with P-Sensitive K-Anonymity

Twinkle Patel Kiran Amin
Random Articles
Reseach Article

Simulation of Different SPI Models

by Bharti Sharma, Neeraj Sharma, Neeshu Sharma
journal cover thumbnail

International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 1 - Number 10
Year of Publication: 2010
Authors: Bharti Sharma, Neeraj Sharma, Neeshu Sharma
10.5120/227-378

Bharti Sharma, Neeraj Sharma, Neeshu Sharma . Simulation of Different SPI Models. International Journal of Computer Applications. 1, 10 ( February 2010), 22-25. DOI=10.5120/227-378

@article{ 10.5120/227-378,
author = { Bharti Sharma, Neeraj Sharma, Neeshu Sharma },
title = { Simulation of Different SPI Models },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { February 2010 },
volume = { 1 },
number = { 10 },
month = { February },
year = { 2010 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 22-25 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume1/number10/227-378/ },
doi = { 10.5120/227-378 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T19:45:42.088365+05:30
%A Bharti Sharma
%A Neeraj Sharma
%A Neeshu Sharma
%T Simulation of Different SPI Models
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 1
%N 10
%P 22-25
%D 2010
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

Software process improvement is recognized as an important part of the software development life cycle. Several contemporary models have been developed to assist organizations evaluate and improve their software development processes and capabilities. This study provide simulation of the existing models ( Capability Maturity Model, ISO, SPIQ, ProPAM, Bootstrap, Trillium, SixSigma, SPICE ), analyze each models along with their importance and drawbacks .

References
  1. Brodman, J., & Johnson, D. (1997). A software process improvement approach for small organizations and small projects. Paper presented at the International Conference on Software Engineering, Boston, MA.
  2. Coronado and Antony, 2002, "Critical success factors for the successful implementation of six sigma projects in organizations". The TQM Magazine. v14 i2. 92-99.
  3. Herbsleb, J., Zubrow, D., Goldenson, D., Hayes, W., & Paulk, M. (1997). Software quality and the capability maturity model. Communications of the ACM, 40(6), 30-40.
  4. Paula Ventura Martins, Alberto Rodrigues da Silva "A camapartive study of SPI approaches in proPAM model" QUATIC '07: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Quality of Information and Communications Technology, September 2007
  5. Weissfelner, S. (1999). ISO 9001 for Software Organizations. "Elements of Software Process Assessment and Improvement Washington".
  6. Wiegers, K. (1999). "Software process improvement in Web time". IEEE Software, 16(4), 78-76.
  7. Zahran. (1998). "Software Process Improvement: Practical Guidelines for Business Success. Reading, MA:Addison
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

SPI Models Capability Maturity Model ISO SPIQ ProPAM

Powered by PhDFocusTM