CFP last date
20 May 2024
Reseach Article

Task Accomplishment to Verify True Intelligence in AI Agents

by Madhura Dhande, Anuradha Jadhav, Shankar Gandhi, Nilesh Sonwane
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 1 - Number 11
Year of Publication: 2010
Authors: Madhura Dhande, Anuradha Jadhav, Shankar Gandhi, Nilesh Sonwane
10.5120/244-401

Madhura Dhande, Anuradha Jadhav, Shankar Gandhi, Nilesh Sonwane . Task Accomplishment to Verify True Intelligence in AI Agents. International Journal of Computer Applications. 1, 11 ( February 2010), 40-43. DOI=10.5120/244-401

@article{ 10.5120/244-401,
author = { Madhura Dhande, Anuradha Jadhav, Shankar Gandhi, Nilesh Sonwane },
title = { Task Accomplishment to Verify True Intelligence in AI Agents },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { February 2010 },
volume = { 1 },
number = { 11 },
month = { February },
year = { 2010 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 40-43 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume1/number11/244-401/ },
doi = { 10.5120/244-401 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T19:46:00.141326+05:30
%A Madhura Dhande
%A Anuradha Jadhav
%A Shankar Gandhi
%A Nilesh Sonwane
%T Task Accomplishment to Verify True Intelligence in AI Agents
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 1
%N 11
%P 40-43
%D 2010
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

The concept of artificial intelligence was introduced to the world by Alan Turing in 1950. From then many researches are done to strengthen the AI. By developing new techniques in this field scientists are trying to make robots that are efficient in various domains of intelligence such as perception, reasoning, decision making, self learning, natural language processing, problem solving etc. While doing this, researchers have come across various problem and difficulties and are engaged in solving those. Thus many a time research, problem and future regarding the AI are mostly discussed. Even the negative aspects of AI are also seen being discussed so as to avoid any further complication in future but rarely is there any discussion on how to test whether the so called intelligent robots are really so? Alan Turing, the father of AI, himself tried to answer this question by suggesting the famous ‘Turing Test’. But its inadequacy was proved by another famous test called the ‘Chinese Room Test’. The problem is the most intelligent looking acts such as conversing and playing chess are in reality just an illusion caused due to smart computer techniques or advanced mathematics. These are not based on the true ability to think. So considering this theme as our focal point we have tried to explore a few ‘tasks’ when provided to an ‘intelligent’ machine will prove its degree of intelligence. We have used various domains of intelligence to formulate a task. This paper will explain about how to differentiate between true intelligence and the imitation of intelligence with the help of these tasks. Accomplishment of these tasks by any virtual machine will open many new possible application of AI and also these tasks may prove as guideline for further research techniques. Also we have tried to justify the reason to continue the research and development of AI for betterment of humankind.

References
  1. McCarthy, J.: Active environments: Sensing and responding to groups of people. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 5 (2001) available at http://www.inf.ethz.ch/vs/events/dag2001/.
  2. O. Stock and M. Zancanaro: Intelligent Interactive Information Presentation for Cultural Tourism. In: Proceedings of the International CLASS Workshop on Natural Intelligent and Effective Interaction in Multimodal Dialogue Systems, Copenhagen, Denmark (2002)
  3. Busetta, P., Don´a, A., Nori, M.: Channeled multicast for group communications. In: Proc. of the first intern. joint conf. on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems, ACM Press (2002) 1280–1287
  4. Gutnik, G., Kaminka, G.: Towards a Formal Approach to Overhearing: Algorithms for Conversation Identification. In: Third International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems (AAMAS 2004), NewYork, USA (2004)
  5. Nair, R., Tambe, M., Marsella, S., Raines, T.: Automated assistants for analyzing team behaviors. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 8 (2004) 69–111
  6. Legras, F., Tessier, C.: Lotto: group formation by overhearing in large teams. In: Proceedings of the second international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems, ACM Press (2003) 425–432
  7. Kaminka, G.A., Pynadath, D., Tambe, M.: Monitoring Teams by Overhearing: A Multi-Agent Plan-Recognition Approach. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 17 (2002) 83–135
  8. Cohen, P.R., Levesque, H.J.: Teamwork. Technical Report 504, AI Center, SRI International, Menlo Park, CA (1991)
  9. Kumar, S., Huber, M.J., Cohen, P.R., McGee, D.R.: Toward a formalism for conversation protocols using joint intention theory. Computational Intell 18 (2002)174–174
  10. Chopra, A.K., Singh, M.P.: Nonmonotonic Commitment Machines. In: Advances in Agent Communication. Volume LNAI 2922., Springer (2004)
  11. Smith, I.A., Cohen, P.R.: Toward a semantics for an agent communication language based on speech acts. In Shrobe, H., Senator, T., eds.: Proceedings of the Thirteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence and the Eighth Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence Conference, Vol. 2, Menlo Park, California, AAAI Press (1996) 24–31
  12. Smith, I., Cohen, P., Bradshaw, J., Greaves, M., Holmback, H.: Designing conversation policies using joint intention theory. In: Proceedings of Third International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems (ICMAS98). (1998)
  13. Busetta, P., Merzi, M., Rossi, S., Legras, F.: Intra-Role Coordination Using Group Communication: A Preliminary Report. In: Advances in Agent Communication. Volume LNAI 2922., Springer (2004) 231–253
  14. Edwards, W.K.: Policies and roles in collaborative applications. In: Proceedings of the 1996 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work, Boston, Massachusetts, ACM, ACM Press (1996) 11–20
  15. Smith, R.B., Hixon, R., Horan, B.: Supporting flexible roles in a shared space. In: Proceedings of the 1998 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work, ACM Press (1998) 197–206
  16. Bales, R.F.: Interaction Process Analysis: A Method for the Study of Small Groups. Addison-Wesley, Cambridge, Mass. (1976)
  17. Conte, R., Dignum, F.: From social monitoring to normative influence. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 4 (2001)
  18. Kaminka, G.A., Tambe, M.: Robust agent teams via socially-attentive monitoring. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 12 (2000) 105–147
  19. Rao, A.S., Georgeff, M.P.: BDI-agents: from theory to practice. In: Proceedings of the First Intl. Conference on Multiagent Systems, San Francisco (1995)
  20. Rao, A.S.: AgentSpeak(L): BDI agents speak out in a logical computable language. In van Hoe, R., ed.: Seventh EuropeanWorkshop on Modelling Autonomous Agents in a Multi-Agent World. LNAI 1038, Eindhoven, The Netherlands, Springer-Verlag (1996)
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Intelligence object recognition vision perception decision making reasoning ability