CFP last date
22 April 2024
Call for Paper
May Edition
IJCA solicits high quality original research papers for the upcoming May edition of the journal. The last date of research paper submission is 22 April 2024

Submit your paper
Know more
Reseach Article

Fuzzy Based Experimental Verification of Significance of Skull Tissue removal in Brain Tumor Image segmentation

by J.Anitha, C.Kezi Selva Vijila, D.Jude Hemanth
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 1 - Number 29
Year of Publication: 2010
Authors: J.Anitha, C.Kezi Selva Vijila, D.Jude Hemanth
10.5120/572-245

J.Anitha, C.Kezi Selva Vijila, D.Jude Hemanth . Fuzzy Based Experimental Verification of Significance of Skull Tissue removal in Brain Tumor Image segmentation. International Journal of Computer Applications. 1, 29 ( February 2010), 56-61. DOI=10.5120/572-245

@article{ 10.5120/572-245,
author = { J.Anitha, C.Kezi Selva Vijila, D.Jude Hemanth },
title = { Fuzzy Based Experimental Verification of Significance of Skull Tissue removal in Brain Tumor Image segmentation },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { February 2010 },
volume = { 1 },
number = { 29 },
month = { February },
year = { 2010 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 56-61 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume1/number29/572-245/ },
doi = { 10.5120/572-245 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T19:42:02.569704+05:30
%A J.Anitha
%A C.Kezi Selva Vijila
%A D.Jude Hemanth
%T Fuzzy Based Experimental Verification of Significance of Skull Tissue removal in Brain Tumor Image segmentation
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 1
%N 29
%P 56-61
%D 2010
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

In anatomical aspects, magnetic resonance (MR) imaging offers more accurate information for medical examination than other medical images such as X-ray, ultrasonic and CT images. Tumor segmentation from MRI data is an important but time consuming task performed manually by medical experts. Automating this process is challenging due to the high diversity in appearance of tumor tissue, among different patients and, in many cases, similarity between tumor and normal tissue. One of the reasons behind the inferior segmentation efficiency is the presence of artifacts in the MR images. One such artifact is the extracranial tissues (skull). These extracranial tissues often interfere with the normal tissues during segmentation that accounts for the inferior segmentation efficiency. In this paper, an automated segmentation and lesion detection algorithm for high segmentation efficiency is proposed for abnormal MR brain images. The proposed segmentation algorithm consists of three steps. In the first step, extracranial tissues are removed using morphological operations. In the second step, fuzzy C-means algorithm is used to segment the MR brain images into four groups: white matter, gray matter, cerebrospinal fluid and the abnormal tumor region. Finally, pseudo-colouring operation is performed on the segmented image to detect the abnormal tumor region. The proposed method has been applied to abnormal images from four different types namely metastase, meningima, glioma and astrocytoma.the superior nature of the proposed approach is justified by performing a comparative analysis on skull stripped images and non-skull stripped images. Experimental results suggest that the proposed approach provides an effective and promising method for brain tumor extraction from MR images with high accuracy.

References
  1. Haack. E et.al. 1999. Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Physical Principles and Sequence Design. Weily-Liss, New York.
  2. Fletcher.H.L, Hall.L, Goldgof.D and Murtagh.F.R. 2001. Automatic segmentation of non-enhancing brain tumors in magnetic resonance images. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine. 21, 43-63.
  3. Hassan.K,et.al. 2009. 3D brain tumor segmentation in MRI using fuzzy classification, symmetry analysis and spatially constrained deformable models. Fuzzy Sytems and Archive. 160, 10, 1457-1473.
  4. Shan.Z.,Yue.G and .Liu.J. 2002. Automated Histogram-Based Brain Segmentation In T1-Weighted Three-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Head Images. Neuroimage. 17, 1587-1598.
  5. Cardenas.V,.Ezekiel.A and Fenin,G.C. 2001. Reliability Of Tissue Volumes And Their Spatial Distribution For Segmented Magnetic Resonance Images. Psychiatry Research. 106, 193-205.
  6. Stokking.R., Niceken,K.L and Viergever,M.A. 2001. Automatic Morphology Based Segmentation From MRI Data. Neuroimage. 12 ,726-738.
  7. Laperrire.N and Berstein.M. 1994. Radiotherapy For Brain Tumors. A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 4, 96-108.
  8. Selvathi.D, et.al. 2005. MRI Image Segmentation Using Unsupervised Clustering Techniques. Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Multimedia Applications. 105-110.
  9. Sanchez.D, et.al. 2005. Tree-dimensional technique for automatic brain segmentation of the ventricles based on optimal histogram thresholds of MRI. Proceedings of the 9th WSEAS International Conference on Computers. WSEAS Press, Stevens Point, Wisconsin, USA.
  10. Papageorgieu et.al. 2008. Brain tumor characterization using the soft computing technique of fuzzy cognitive maps. Applied Soft Computing. 8, 1, 820-828.
  11. Demir.C,et.al. 2005. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics. 2, 3, 262-270.
  12. Garcia.C and Moreno.J. 2004. Kernel based method for segmentation and modeling of magnetic resonance images. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. 3315:636-645.
  13. Shubangi D.C, et.al. 2009. Support Vector Machine Classifier for Brain Tumor detection. International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communication and Control. ACM, NewYork. 444-448.
  14. Gering.D. 2003. Recognizing Deviations from Normalcy for Brain Tumor Segmentation. PhD thesis, MIT.
  15. Capelle.A, Colot.O, and Fernandez.C.M. 2004. Evidential segmentation scheme of multi-echo MR images for the detection of brain tumors using neighborhood information. Information Fusion. 5, 3, 203-216.
  16. Ruan.S, et.al. 2002. Fuzzy Markovian segmentation in application of magnetic resonance images. Computer Vision and Image Understanding. 85,1, 54-69.
  17. Taxt.T and Lundervold.A. 1994. Multispectral analysis of the brain using magnetic resonance imaging. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging. 13, 470-481.
  18. Siyal.M.Y and Yu.L. 2005. An intelligent modified fuzzy c-means based algorithm for bias estimation and segmentation of brain MRI. Pattern Recognition Letters. 26, 13, 2052-2062
  19. Gonzalez.R and Woods.R. 2002. Digital Image Processing. Pearson Education, 2nd Edition.
  20. Thierry.G and Isabelle.B.2005. Segmentation of brain structures from MR images using morphological approaches. Medical Image Analysis. 162, 1-31.
  21. Jain.A.K. 1989. Fundamentals of Digital Image Procesing. Prentice-Hall, Inc. Upper Saddle River, NJ.
  22. Yang.Y and Zheng.Ch. 2005. Fuzzy C-means clustering algorithm with a novel penalty term for image segmentation. Opto-electronics review.13, 4, 309-315.
  23. MATLAB, User’s Guide. 2002. The MathWorks.Inc.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

MRI Segmentation Fuzzy Extra cranial Segmentation efficiency