CFP last date
20 May 2024
Reseach Article

Moving Object Segmentation in Dynamic Environment by Reducing Impulsive Noise from Background Model

by Satrughan Kumar, Jigyendra Sen Yadav
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 118 - Number 22
Year of Publication: 2015
Authors: Satrughan Kumar, Jigyendra Sen Yadav
10.5120/20881-3632

Satrughan Kumar, Jigyendra Sen Yadav . Moving Object Segmentation in Dynamic Environment by Reducing Impulsive Noise from Background Model. International Journal of Computer Applications. 118, 22 ( May 2015), 43-48. DOI=10.5120/20881-3632

@article{ 10.5120/20881-3632,
author = { Satrughan Kumar, Jigyendra Sen Yadav },
title = { Moving Object Segmentation in Dynamic Environment by Reducing Impulsive Noise from Background Model },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { May 2015 },
volume = { 118 },
number = { 22 },
month = { May },
year = { 2015 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 43-48 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume118/number22/20881-3632/ },
doi = { 10.5120/20881-3632 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T23:02:28.498869+05:30
%A Satrughan Kumar
%A Jigyendra Sen Yadav
%T Moving Object Segmentation in Dynamic Environment by Reducing Impulsive Noise from Background Model
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 118
%N 22
%P 43-48
%D 2015
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

A background subtraction method is a computationally inexpensive way to identify moving objects in the scene without any prior information about object and it also provides a sufficient light of information to accomplish critical task in traffic monitoring, object tracking, pattern recognition, human gait and gesture detection. However, for real time systems, the background scene is seriously affected due to changes in lightening condition, shadow cast by moving object, swaying tree, rippling water and much more, which hurdles to produce a reliable motion mask. In this concern, we focus toward the selection of the background pixel by mapping the time variance and absolute difference image in order to cope with abrupt illumination and preserve the spatial consistency. Further the local statistical properties and variance of background image are employed to reduce the local noise impulse within background candidate. Experimental results show that it can work well under static and dynamic background condition.

References
  1. Cutler, R. , & Davis, L. S. 2000. Robust real-time periodic motion detection, analysis, and applications. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, IEEE Transactions on, 22(8), 781-796.
  2. M. M. Azab, H. A. Shedeed, A. S. Hussein. 2010. A new technique for background modeling and subtraction for motion detection in real-time videos. IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), pp. 3453–3456.
  3. Cheung, S. C. S. , & Kamath, C. 2005. Robust background subtraction with foreground validation for urban traffic video. Eurasip Journal on applied signal processing, 2330-2340.
  4. Patel, C. I. , Garg, S. , Zaveri, T. , & Banerjee, A. 2014. Top-Down and Bottom-Up Cues Based Moving Object Detection for Varied Background Video Sequences. Advances in Multimedia, 2014.
  5. Anderson, S. J. , & Burr, D. C. 1985. Spatial and temporal selectivity of the human motion detection system. Vision research, 25(8), 1147-1154.
  6. Selvanayaki, K. S. , & Somasundaram, R. M. 2013. A Survey on Image Segmentation Techniques for Edge Detection. In IJCA Proceedings on International Conference on Innovation in Communication, Information and Computing 2013 (Vol. 303, No. 2, pp. 31-34). Foundation of Computer Science (FCS).
  7. Do, B. H. , & Huang, S. C. 2011. Dynamic background modeling based on radial basis function neural networks for moving object detection. IEEE International Conference on In Multimedia and Expo (ICME), (pp. 1-4).
  8. Bouwmans, T. 2014. Traditional and recent approaches in background modeling for foreground detection: An overview. Computer Science Review, 11, 31-66.
  9. L. Wang, W. Hu, and T. Tan,. 2003. Recent developments in human motion analysis. Pattern Recognition, Vol. 36,No. 3, pp. 585-601.
  10. C. R. Wren, A. Azarbayejani, T. Darrell, and A. P. Pentland. 1997Pfinder: real-time tracking of the human body. IEEE PAMI,9(7):780–785.
  11. C. Stauffer and W. Grimson. Adaptive background mixture models for real-time tracking. 1999. In CVPR99, volume 2, page-252.
  12. N. McFarlane and C. 1995. Schofield. Segmentation and tracking of piglets in images. MVA, 8:187–193.
  13. S. Calderara,R. Melli, A. Prati, and R. Cucchiara. 2006. Reliable background suppression for complex scenes. In VSSN06,pp-211–214.
  14. N. Oliver, B. Rosario, and A. Pentland. 2000. A bayesian computer vision system for modeling human interactions. IEEE PAMI,22:831–843.
  15. Z. Zhu, Y. Wang. 2012. A Hybrid Algorithm for Automatic Segmentation of Slow Moving Objects. AEU-Int. Journal of Electronics and Communications, vol. 66, pp. 249-254.
  16. Mazoul, A. , Zebbara, K. , & Ansari, M. 2012. Street crossing pedestrian detection based on edge curves motion. International Journal of Computer Applications, 41(16), 20-24.
  17. Rahman, F. Y. A. , Hussain, A. , Zaki, W. M. D. W. , Zaman, H. B. , & Tahir, N. M. 2013. Enhancement of background subtraction techniques using a second derivative in gradient direction filter. Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering, 21.
  18. Manzanera, A. , & Richefeu, J. C. 2007. A new motion detection algorithm based on ?–? background estimation. Pattern Recognition Letters, 28(3), 320-328.
  19. Antoine Manzanera and J. C. Richefeu . 2007. A robust and computationally efficient motion detection algorithm based on ?-? background estimation. ICVGIP, 46-51.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Background subtraction Motion detection Time variance Segmentation Morphology