CFP last date
20 May 2024
Call for Paper
June Edition
IJCA solicits high quality original research papers for the upcoming June edition of the journal. The last date of research paper submission is 20 May 2024

Submit your paper
Know more
The week's pick
Responsive image
Enhancing Privacy Preservation: Multi-Attribute Protection with P-Sensitive K-Anonymity

Twinkle Patel Kiran Amin
Random Articles
Reseach Article

Personalized QOS based Ranking Approach for Cloud Service Selection

by G. Ramya, K. Radhika
journal cover thumbnail

International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 127 - Number 18
Year of Publication: 2015
Authors: G. Ramya, K. Radhika
10.5120/ijca2015906737

G. Ramya, K. Radhika . Personalized QOS based Ranking Approach for Cloud Service Selection. International Journal of Computer Applications. 127, 18 ( October 2015), 27-34. DOI=10.5120/ijca2015906737

@article{ 10.5120/ijca2015906737,
author = { G. Ramya, K. Radhika },
title = { Personalized QOS based Ranking Approach for Cloud Service Selection },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { October 2015 },
volume = { 127 },
number = { 18 },
month = { October },
year = { 2015 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 27-34 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume127/number18/22832-2015906737/ },
doi = { 10.5120/ijca2015906737 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T23:18:34.482556+05:30
%A G. Ramya
%A K. Radhika
%T Personalized QOS based Ranking Approach for Cloud Service Selection
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 127
%N 18
%P 27-34
%D 2015
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

Cloud computing is an Internet-based computing model. This model enables access to resources and services on demand. Cloud computing users have applications with different Quality of Service requirements. On the other hand, there are different cloud service providers offering services with different qualitative characteristics. Determining the best cloud computing service for a specific application is a significant research problem. Ranking of cloud service providers compares different services offered by different providers based on quality of service, in order to select the most suitable cloud service provider. QoS parameters provide valuable information for making optimal cloud service selection from a set of functionally equivalent service candidates. To obtain QoS values, real-world invocations on the service candidates are usually required. This project proposes a QoS ranking prediction framework for cloud services that eliminates delay and expenses involved in real-world service invocations. It makes use of the past service usage experiences of other users. This framework does not require any additional invocations of cloud services while making QoS ranking prediction. The algorithm is implemented by considering both cost and benefit parameters such as Response time and throughput respectively using a database containing response time and throughput values of 300 users for 10 different cloud providers. Also, Sensitivity analysis is done by varying weights of individual QoS parameters to verify the correctness of the algorithm. It is observed from the results that the proposed cloud service selection algorithm is able to appropriately choose the best cloud service provider depending on the weights of the respective QoS parameters.

References
  1. B R. Burke, “Hybrid Recommender Systems: Survey and Experiments,” User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 331-370, 2002.
  2. P. Resnick, N. Iacovou, M. Suchak, P. Bergstrom, and J. Riedl, “Grouplens: An Open Architecture for Collaborative Filtering of Netnews,” Proc. ACM Conf. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 175-186, 1994.
  3. J.S. Breese, D. Heckerman, and C. Kadie, “Empirical Analysis of Predictive Algorithms for Collaborative Filtering,” Proc. 14th Ann. Conf. Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI ’98), pp. 43-52, 1998
  4. R. Jin, J.Y. Chai, and L. Si, “An Automatic Weighting Scheme for Collaborative Filtering,” Proc. 27th Int’l ACM SIGIR Conf. Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR ’04), pp. 337-344, 2004
  5. M. Deshpande and G. Karypis, “Item-Based Top-n Recommendation,” ACM Trans. Information System, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 143-177, 2004
  6. G. Linden, B. Smith, and J. York, “Amazon.Com Recommendations: Item-to-Item Collaborative Filtering,” IEEE Internet Computing, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 76-80, Jan./Feb. 2003.
  7. B. Sarwar, G. Karypis, J. Konstan, and J. Riedl, “Item-Based Collaborative Filtering Recommendation Algorithms,” Proc. 10th Int’l Conf. World Wide Web (WWW ’01), pp. 285-295, 2001.
  8. H. Ma, I. King, and M.R. Lyu, “Effective Missing Data Prediction for Collaborative Filtering,” Proc. 30th Int’l ACM SIGIR Conf. Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR ’07), pp. 39-46, 2007.
  9. J. Wu, L. Chen, Y. Feng, Z. Zheng, M. Zhou, and Z. Wu, “Predicting QoS for Service Selection by Neighborhood-Based Collaborative Filtering,” IEEE Trans. System, Man, and Cybernetics, Part A, to appear.
  10. Z. Zheng, H. Ma, M.R. Lyu, and I. King, “WSRec: A Collaborative Filtering Based Web Service Recommender System,” Proc. Seventh Int’l Conf. Web Services (ICWS ’09), pp. 437-444, 2009.
  11. Z. Zheng, H. Ma, M.R. Lyu, and I. King, “QoS-Aware Web Service Recommendation by Collaborative Filtering,” IEEE Trans. Service Computing, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 140-152, Apr.-June 2011.
  12. J.S. Breese, D. Heckerman, and C. Kadie, “Empirical Analysis of Predictive Algorithms for Collaborative Filtering,” Proc. 14th Ann. Conf. Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI ’98), pp. 43-52, 1998.
  13. N.N. Liu and Q. Yang, “Eigenrank: A Ranking-Oriented Approach to Collaborative Filtering,” Proc. 31st Int’l ACM SIGIR Conf. Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR ’08), pp. 83-90, 2008.
  14. C. Yang, B. Wei, J. Wu, Y. Zhang, and L. Zhang, “Cares: A Ranking-Oriented Cadal Recommender System,” Proc. Ninth ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conf. Digital Libraries (JCDL ’09), pp. 203-212, 2009.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Cloud computing Quality of Service ranking prediction personalization

Powered by PhDFocusTM