CFP last date
22 April 2024
Reseach Article

Analyze the Performance difference between Delay Sensitive and Delay Insensitive Routing Algorithms in Underwater Sensor Networks

by Akanksha Dubey, Anand Rajavat
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 130 - Number 12
Year of Publication: 2015
Authors: Akanksha Dubey, Anand Rajavat
10.5120/ijca2015907128

Akanksha Dubey, Anand Rajavat . Analyze the Performance difference between Delay Sensitive and Delay Insensitive Routing Algorithms in Underwater Sensor Networks. International Journal of Computer Applications. 130, 12 ( November 2015), 10-15. DOI=10.5120/ijca2015907128

@article{ 10.5120/ijca2015907128,
author = { Akanksha Dubey, Anand Rajavat },
title = { Analyze the Performance difference between Delay Sensitive and Delay Insensitive Routing Algorithms in Underwater Sensor Networks },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { November 2015 },
volume = { 130 },
number = { 12 },
month = { November },
year = { 2015 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 10-15 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume130/number12/23260-2015907128/ },
doi = { 10.5120/ijca2015907128 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T23:25:21.154751+05:30
%A Akanksha Dubey
%A Anand Rajavat
%T Analyze the Performance difference between Delay Sensitive and Delay Insensitive Routing Algorithms in Underwater Sensor Networks
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 130
%N 12
%P 10-15
%D 2015
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

Under water sensor network protocol research is a hot research topic in the networking field. These protocols are designed on the basis of UWSN application requirements. Selection of protocol is depends on the basis of system requirement and its application. Real time applications are time variant and require reliability for communicating in side water. Average time to time Delay of nodes is the most important key parameter for delay-sensitive applications of UWSN. In this research researchers are working on two distributed routing protocols Delay-sensitive routing protocol (DSRP) and Delay-insensitive routing protocol (DIRP). Researchers compared the performance of the both routing solutions on the basis of some parameters; those parameters are energy consumption, Packet delivery ratio, Average end-to-end delay, and Throughput. Simulation shows performance of routing algorithms for Delay-sensitive and delay-insensitive applications.

References
  1. I. F. Akyildiz, D. Pompili, and T. Melodia, “Underwater acoustic sensor networks: research challenges,” Ad Hoc Networks, vol. 3, no. 3, pp.257–279, 2005
  2. D. Pompili, T. Melodia, and I. F. Akyildiz, “Routing algorithms for delay-insensitive and delay-sensitive applications in underwater sensor networks," in Proc. ACM Conf. Mobile Comput. Netw. (MobiCom),Los Angeles, CA, Sep. 2006.
  3. Distributed Routing Algorithms for Underwater Acoustic Sensor Networks Dario Pompili, Member, IEEE, Tommaso Melodia, and Ian F. Akyildiz, IEEE transactions on wireless communications, vol. 9, no. 9, september 2010.
  4. D. Pompili and I. F. Akyildiz, “A cross-layer communication solution for multimedia applications in underwater acoustic sensor networks," in Proc. IEEE International Conf. Mobile Ad-hoc Sensor Syst. (MASS), Atlanta, GA, Sep. 2008.
  5. Muhammad Ayaz n, Imran Baig, Azween Abdullah, Ibrahima Faye "A survey on routing techniques in underwater wireless sensor networks" CIS Department, EE Department, FAS Department, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, Malaysia Journal of Network and Computer Applications Article Elsevier 2011.
  6. V. Chandrasekhar, W. K. Seah, Y. S. Choo, and H. V. Ee, “Localization in underwater sensor networks—survey and challenges," in Proc. ACM International Workshop UnderWater Netw. (WUWNet), Los Angeles, CA, Sep. 2006.
  7. D. Pompili, T. Melodia, and I. F. Akyildiz, “A resilient routing algorithm for long-term applications in underwater sensor networks," in Proc.Mediterranean Ad Hoc Netw. Workshop (Med-Hoc-Net), Lipari, Italy, June 2006.
  8. A. Nimbalkar and D. Pompili, “Reliability in underwater inter-vehicle communications," in Proc. ACM International Workshop UnderWater Netw. (WUWNet), San Francisco, CA, Sep. 2008.
  9. Mari Carmen Domingo, Rui Prior, "Energy analysis of routing protocols for underwater wireless sensor networks" in ScienceDirect computer communication Article 31 Elesvier, 2008, pp. 1227-1238.
  10. John Heidemann Milica Stojanovic and Michele Zorzi, "Underwater sensor networks: applications,advances and challenges" in Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A, 370 2012 pp.158-175.
  11. Sarma, H.K.D. Kar, A. Mall, R. "Energy efficient routing protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks with Node and Sink mobility" in Sensors Applications Symposium (SAS), 2011 IEEE Date 22-24 Feb. 2011 San Antonio, TX.
  12. K. Akkaya and M. Younis, “A survey on routing protocols for wireless sensor networks," Ad Hoc Netw. (Elsevier), vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 325-349, May 2005.
  13. Long Zhaohua, ChongQing, Liu Jianfeng ; Jiang Guiquan "Survey of routing protocols in wireless sensor networks based on applications" in 2nd International Conference on Industrial and Information Systems (IIS), in 2010.
  14. M. Zorzi, P. Casari, N. Baldo, and A. Harris, “Energy-Efficient Routing Schemes for Underwater Acoustic Networks,” Selected Area in Communications, IEEE Journal on, vol. 26, no. 9, pp. 1754–1766, 2008. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/JSAC.2008.081214
  15. P. Xie, J.-H. Cui, and L. Lao, “VBF: vector-based forwarding protocol for underwater sensor networks," in Proc. Netw., Coimbra, Portugal, May 2006.
  16. W. Zhang and U. Mitra, “A delay-reliability analysis for multihop underwater acoustic communication," in Proc. ACM International Workshop UnderWater Netw. (WUWNet), Montreal, Quebec, Canada, Sep. 2007.
  17. P. Xie, Z. Zhou, Z. Peng, H. Yan, T. Hu, J.-H. Cui, Z. Shi, Y. Fei, and S. Zhou, “Aqua-sim: An ns-2 based simulator for underwater sensor networks,” in OCEANS 2009, MTS/IEEE Biloxi - Marine Technology for Our Future: Global and Local Challenges, 2009, pp. 1–7.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Underwater sensor network DSRP DIRP Average end-to-end Delay Energy consumption Packet delivery ratio Throughput.