CFP last date
20 May 2024
Reseach Article

Intelligent Real-Time Systems for Managing Catastrophe through Scenario Shift Paradigm

by T.R. Gopalakrishnan Nair, A. Christy Persya
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 130 - Number 12
Year of Publication: 2015
Authors: T.R. Gopalakrishnan Nair, A. Christy Persya
10.5120/ijca2015907134

T.R. Gopalakrishnan Nair, A. Christy Persya . Intelligent Real-Time Systems for Managing Catastrophe through Scenario Shift Paradigm. International Journal of Computer Applications. 130, 12 ( November 2015), 21-26. DOI=10.5120/ijca2015907134

@article{ 10.5120/ijca2015907134,
author = { T.R. Gopalakrishnan Nair, A. Christy Persya },
title = { Intelligent Real-Time Systems for Managing Catastrophe through Scenario Shift Paradigm },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { November 2015 },
volume = { 130 },
number = { 12 },
month = { November },
year = { 2015 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 21-26 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume130/number12/23262-2015907134/ },
doi = { 10.5120/ijca2015907134 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T23:25:21.905604+05:30
%A T.R. Gopalakrishnan Nair
%A A. Christy Persya
%T Intelligent Real-Time Systems for Managing Catastrophe through Scenario Shift Paradigm
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 130
%N 12
%P 21-26
%D 2015
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

The intelligent real-time system design needs to incorporate autonomic features in their operations to achieve the unexpected criticalities of systems and its environment. Catastrophic scenarios can emerge in systems, challenging the traditional role of real-time systems where the temporal rigidity is the essential design feature. The priorities and its management scheme given for a normal operation by the conventional real-time systems need not be the ultimate format to meet the requirements of a catastrophic environment. Hence, usual real-time system is supplemented with a layer of intelligence to deal with the emerging catastrophic environment. Intelligent real-time systems can have hybrid schedulers with some additional features that can guarantee risk mitigation performance even with the occurrence of extreme, unusual variations of external conditions. This approach addresses intelligence in systems by making a real-time system schedule itself to adapt meaningfully even if the environment changes, by assigning intelligent priorities. This paper introduces the design of Intelligent Real-Time System (IRTS) that keep shifting the boundaries of the original hybrid scheduler with cognitive features aiding the intelligence by increasing the possibility to make a dynamically reconfigured system while increasing the fairness of the scheduling. Intelligent scheduler can be used in embedded critical systems in order to cope with the unexpected problems like nuclear power plants and hazardous installations. Theoretical analysis shows that the proposed design performs the operation of IRTS, which can be advantageously applied to pragmatic systems and show how intelligence works with priority.

References
  1. Yun Niu, Guanzhong Dai, Reservation-Based State Feedback Scheduler for Hybrid Real-Time Systems, High Performance Computing and Communications, 2008. HPCC '08. 10th IEEE International Conference, 25- 27 Sept. 2008, 198- 204.
  2. Insop Song, Sehjeong Kim; Karray, F. A Real-Time Scheduler Design for a Class of Embedded Systems, Mechatronics, IEEE/ASME Transactions, Feb. 2008, 36- 45.
  3. Liang-Teh Lee; Chia-Ying Tseng; Shieh-Jie Hsu, An Adaptive Scheduler For Embedded Multi-Processor Real- Time Systems, TENCON 2007 - 2007 IEEE Region 10 Conference, 2007, 1- 6.
  4. Celio Estevan Moron† and Hussein Zedan, Adaptable Scheduler Using milestones For Hard Real-TimeSystems, www.cs.york.ac.uk/ftpdir/reports/YCS-93-191.pdf.
  5. Coskun, Erman and Grabowski, Martha, "Assessment of Intelligence Complexity in Embedded Intelligent Real Time Systems" (2002). ECIS 2002 Proceedings. Paper 46. http://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2002/46
  6. Lopez, P.G.; Sandoval Gomez, R.J.; Torres, F.V., Measuring the efficiency of Schedulers for Concurrent Real- time Tasks in Uniprocessor Systems, Circuits and Systems, 2009. MWSCAS '09. 52nd IEEE International Midwest Symposium, 2009, 1078- 1080.
  7. Hugo Marcondes, Rafael Cancian, Marcelo Stemmer, Antônio Augusto Frohlich, On the design of exible real- time schedulersfor embedded systems, Proceeding CSE '09 Proceedings of the 2009 International Conference on Computational Science and Engineering - Volume 02, Pages 382-387, IEEE Computer Society Washington, DC, USA ©2009.
  8. Richardson, P.; Sieh, L.; Elkateeb, A.M., Fault-Tolerant Adaptive Scheduling For Embedded Real-Time Systems, Micro, IEEE, 2001, 41- 51.
  9. C. L. Liu, James W. Layland, Scheduling Algorithms For Multiprogramming In A Hard Real-time Environment, Journal of the ACM (JACM) Volume 20 Issue 1, Jan. 1973, 46 - 61, ACM New York, NY, USA.
  10. Xu, Y.; Dong, Z. Y.; Zhao, J. H.; Zhang, P.; Wong, K. P.A Reliable Intelligent System for Real-Time Dynamic Security Assessment of Power Systems, Power Systems, IEEE Transactions, Issue: 99, 2012, 1.
  11. S. Ogrenci Memik , E. Bozorgzadeh , S. Ogrenci , Memik E. Bozorgzadeh , R. Kastner , M. Sarrafzadeh, A Super-Scheduler for Embedded Reconfigurable Systems, 2001.
  12. T.R.Gopalakrishnan Nair; A. Christy Persya, “Critical Task Re-assignment Under Hybrid Scheduling Approach in Multiprocessor Real-time Systems," Parallel and Distributed Computing and Systems, 2011. PDCS 2011, USA. 23rd IASTED International Conference on, vol., no., pp.130-137, 14-16 Dec. 2011.
  13. M. Vaidehi, T. R. Gopalakrishnan Nair, “Multicore Applications in Real-time Systems”, Journal of Research & Industry, Interline Publishing, vol. 1, Issue 1, pp 30-35, 2008.
  14. D. J. Musliner, J. A. Hendler, A. K. Agrawala, E. H. Durfee, J. K. Strosnider, and C. J. Paul,The Challenges of Real-Time AI, IEEE Computer, Vol 28 #1, January 1995. Also appears as University of Maryland Technical Report CS-TR-3290 (UMIACS-TR-94-69).
  15. Kalinowski, Krzysztof, Cezary Grabowik, and Damian Krenczyk. "Predictive-Reactive Strategy for Real-time Scheduling of Manufacturing Systems." Applied Mechanics and Materials 307 (2013): 470-473.
  16. Ouelhadj, Djamila, and Sanja Petrovic. "A survey of dynamic scheduling in manufacturing systems." Journal of scheduling 12.4 (2009): 417-431.
  17. Burns, Alan, and Robert Davis. "Mixed criticality systems-a review."Department of Computer Science, University of York, Tech. Rep (2013).
  18. R. Alur, A. Trivedi, and D. Wojtczak. Optimal scheduling for constantrate multi-mode systems. In Proc. of the 15th ACM International Conference on Hybrid Systems: Computation and Control, HSCC ’12, pages 75–84. ACM, 2012.
  19. A. Burns and T.J. Quiggle. Effective use of abort in programming mode changes. Ada Letters, 1990.
  20. P. Ekberg, M. Stigge, N. Guan, and W. Yi. State- based mode switching with applications to mixed criticality systems. In Proc. WMC, RTSS,pages 61–66, 2013.
  21. Burns, Alan. "System Mode Changes-General and Criticality-Based." WMC. 2014.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Real-time system catastrophe intelligent cognitive priority