CFP last date
22 April 2024
Reseach Article

Nonlocal Hierarchical Dictionary Learning using Wavelets and Gradient Histogram Preservation for Image Denoising: A Review

by Manish Kumar Prajapati, Deepak Gyanchandani
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 132 - Number 9
Year of Publication: 2015
Authors: Manish Kumar Prajapati, Deepak Gyanchandani
10.5120/ijca2015907516

Manish Kumar Prajapati, Deepak Gyanchandani . Nonlocal Hierarchical Dictionary Learning using Wavelets and Gradient Histogram Preservation for Image Denoising: A Review. International Journal of Computer Applications. 132, 9 ( December 2015), 6-11. DOI=10.5120/ijca2015907516

@article{ 10.5120/ijca2015907516,
author = { Manish Kumar Prajapati, Deepak Gyanchandani },
title = { Nonlocal Hierarchical Dictionary Learning using Wavelets and Gradient Histogram Preservation for Image Denoising: A Review },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { December 2015 },
volume = { 132 },
number = { 9 },
month = { December },
year = { 2015 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 6-11 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume132/number9/23620-2015907516/ },
doi = { 10.5120/ijca2015907516 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T23:28:51.885313+05:30
%A Manish Kumar Prajapati
%A Deepak Gyanchandani
%T Nonlocal Hierarchical Dictionary Learning using Wavelets and Gradient Histogram Preservation for Image Denoising: A Review
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 132
%N 9
%P 6-11
%D 2015
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

Image denoising is an important image processing task, both as a process itself, and as a component in other processes. The main properties of a good image denoising model are that it will remove noise while preserving edges. Traditionally, linear models have been used. One common approach is to use a Gaussian filter, In spite of the great success of many denoising algorithms; they tend to smooth the fine scale image textures when removing noise, degrading the image visual quality. To address this problem we compare two methods in this paper. The Nonlocal Hierarchical Dictionary Learning using Wavelet (NHDLW) and Gradient Histogram Preservation (GHP),which is large success in denoising. Experimental result shows that the NHDLW get significantly better denoising results especially on an image denoising algorithms on higher noise levels.

References
  1. B. Ophir, M. Lusting, and M. Elad, “Multi-scale dictionary learning using wavelets,” IEEE J. Sel. Topics Signal Process., vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 1014–1024, Sep. 2011.
  2. P. Chatterjee and P. Milanfar, “Clustering-based denoising with locally learned dictionaries,” IEEE Trans. Image Process., vol. 18, no. 7, pp. 1438–1451, Jul. 2009.
  3. J. Mairal, F. Bach, J. Ponce, G. Sapiro, and A. Zisserman, “Non-local sparse models for image restoration,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Comput. Vis., Kyoto, Japan, Sep./Oct. 2009, pp. 2272–2279.
  4. K. Vladimir, F. Alessandro, E. Karen, and A. Jaakko, “From local kernel to nonlocal multiple-model image denoising,” Int. J. Comput.Vis., vol. 86, no. 1, pp. 1–32, Jan. 2010.
  5. K. Dabov, A. Foi,V. Katkovnik, and K. Egiazarian, “Image denoising by sparse 3-D transform-domain collaborative filtering,” IEEE Trans. Image Process., vol. 16, no. 8, pp. 2080–2095, Aug. 2007.
  6. E. Candes, M. Wakin, and S. Boyd, “Enhancing sparsity by reweighted L1 minimization,” J. Fourier Anal. Appl., vol. 14, pp. 877–905, Nov. 2008.
  7. B. Efron, T. Hastie, I. Johnstone, and R. Tibshirani, “Least angle regression,” Ann. Stat., vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 407–409, 2004.
  8. J. Mairal, F. Bach, J. Ponce, and G. Sapiro, “Online dictionary learning for sparse coding,” in Proc. IEEE Signal Process. Lett, Montreal, QC Canada, Aug. 2009, pp. 689–696.
  9. M. Elad and M. Aharon,“Image denoising via sparse and redundant representations over learned dictionaries,” IEEE Trans. Image Process., vol. 15, no. 12, pp. 3736–3745, Dec. 2006.
  10. J. Mairal, F. Bach, J. Ponce, G. Sapiro, and A. Zisserman, “Non-local sparse models for image restoration,” in Proc. Int. Conf. Comput. Vis., Sep./oct. 2009, pp. 2272–2279.
  11. W. Dong, L. Zhang, G. Shi, and X. Li, “Nonlocally centralized spars representation for image restoration,” IEEE Trans. Image Process., vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 1620–1630, Apr. 2013.
  12. J. Jancsary, S. Nowozin, and C. Rother, “Loss-specific training of nonparametric image restoration models: A new state of the art,” in Proc.12th ECCV, 2012, pp. 112–125.
  13. Z. Wang, A. C. Bovik, H. R. Sheikh, and E. P. Simoncelli, “Image quality assessment: From error visibility to structural similarity,” IEEE Trans. Image Process., vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 600–612, Apr. 2004.
  14. B. Zhang, J. M. Fadili, and J. L. Starck, “Wavelets, ridgelets, and curvelets for Poisson noise removal,” IEEE Trans. Image Process.vol. 17, no. 7, pp. 1093–1108, Jul. 2008.
  15. D. Krishnan and R. Fergus, “Fast image deconvolution using hyper-Laplacian priors,” in Proc. NIPS, 2009, pp. 1033–1041.
  16. T. S. Cho, C. L. Zitnick, N. Joshi, S. B. Kang, R. Szeliski, and W. T. Freeman, “Image restoration by matching gradient distributions,”IEEE. Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 683–694,Apr. 2012.
  17. T. S. Cho, N. Joshi, C. L. Zitnick, S. B. Kang, R. Szeliski, and W. T. Freeman, “A content-aware image prior,” in Proc. Int. Conf. CVPR, Jun. 2010, pp. 169–176.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Image denoising wavelets sparse coding multi-scale nonlocal histogram specification non-local sparse representation.