CFP last date
20 May 2024
Call for Paper
June Edition
IJCA solicits high quality original research papers for the upcoming June edition of the journal. The last date of research paper submission is 20 May 2024

Submit your paper
Know more
The week's pick
Responsive image
Enhancing Privacy Preservation: Multi-Attribute Protection with P-Sensitive K-Anonymity

Twinkle Patel Kiran Amin
Random Articles
Reseach Article

Finite Element based Model of Modified Niagara Foot and its Effect on Stiffness

by Ahmed H. Kandil
journal cover thumbnail

International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 134 - Number 3
Year of Publication: 2016
Authors: Ahmed H. Kandil
10.5120/ijca2016907837

Ahmed H. Kandil . Finite Element based Model of Modified Niagara Foot and its Effect on Stiffness. International Journal of Computer Applications. 134, 3 ( January 2016), 1-7. DOI=10.5120/ijca2016907837

@article{ 10.5120/ijca2016907837,
author = { Ahmed H. Kandil },
title = { Finite Element based Model of Modified Niagara Foot and its Effect on Stiffness },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { January 2016 },
volume = { 134 },
number = { 3 },
month = { January },
year = { 2016 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 1-7 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume134/number3/23891-2016907837/ },
doi = { 10.5120/ijca2016907837 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T23:33:07.426171+05:30
%A Ahmed H. Kandil
%T Finite Element based Model of Modified Niagara Foot and its Effect on Stiffness
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 134
%N 3
%P 1-7
%D 2016
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

A prosthetic foot-ankle system is designed with the purpose of improving the amputee gait by storing and releasing elastic energy during the stance stage of the gait. Such foot performance is based on its structural stiffness characteristics. Choosing the appropriate stiffness of a prosthetic foot is planned to substitute the loss of the muscles and tendons of the intact foot. The aims of this study are to study the effect of the thickness of the upper part of the S-shape and removing the prongs on the structural stiffness of a modified Niagara foot using the FEA. In this work, a simulated model based on finite element is built. Then, an analysis is conducted on the modified models of Niagara foot using the boundary conditions of the ISO-10328 and expanded using the boundary conditions of the ISO-22675 to study the effect of removing the prongs from the models. The stiffness results of the FEA are compared by considering the Kl, K2, and KH values. The prongs of the Niagara foot had a major contribution in force-displacement relationships. So, by removing these prongs, the stresses imposed in a foot due to loading the toe exceeded the yielding stress for the feet when proposing the Delrin 2700 or Hytrel 8238 materials. Also the absence of the prongs showed remarkable effects on the toe stiffness variation with the simulated time of stance, especially at the earlier stages of the toe contact where this effect diminished gradually up to the toe-off.

References
  1. H. W. L. VanJaarsveld, H. J. Grootenboer, J. DE. Vries, and H. F. J. M. Koopman, "Stiffness and hysteresis properties of some prosthetic feet," Prosthetics and Orthotics International, Vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 117-124, 1990.
  2. G. K. Klute, C. F. Kallfelz, and J. M. Czerniecki, "Mechanical properties of prosthetic limbs: Adapting to the patient," Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, Vol. 38, No. 3, pp. 299-307, May/June 2001.
  3. M. El-Mohandes, "Effect of the S-Shape Thickness Variation On The Stiffness Of The Niagara Foot," Al-Azhar University Engineering Journal, JAUES, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 1-8, Dec. 2014.
  4. M. El-Mohandes and M. El.Hussein, "Stiffness Analyses of Modified Niagara Prosthetic Feet Using Finite Element Modelling," in Biomedical Engineering Conference (CIBEC), Cairo, 2014.
  5. X. Bonnet, H. Pillet, P. Fode, F. Lavaste, and W. Skalli, “Finite element modelling of an energy-storing prosthetic foot during the stance phase of transtibial amputee gait,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine, Vol. 226, No. 1, pp. 70–75, Dec. 2011.
  6. Macfarlane, P.A., Nielsen, D.H., Shurr, D.G. and Meier, K., 1991, “Perception of Walking Difficulty by Below-Knee Amputees Using a Conventional Foot Versus the Flex-Foot”, Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics, Vol.3, No. 3, pp. 114-119.
  7. Macfarlane, P.A., Nielsen, D.H., Shurr, D.G. and Meier, K., 1991, “Gait Comparisons for Below-Knee Amputees Using a Flex-Foot(TM) Versus a Conventional Prosthetic Foot”, Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics, Vol.3, No. 4, pp. 150-161.
  8. Thomas, S.S., Buckon, C.E., Helper, D., Turner, N., Moor, M. and Krajbich, J.I., 2000, “Comparison of the Seattle Lite Foot and Genesis II Prosthetic Foot during walking and running”, Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics, Vol.12, No. 1, pp. 9-14.
  9. Faustini, M.C., Neptune, R.R. and Crawford, R.H., 2006, “The quasi-static response of compliant prosthetic sockets for transtibial amputees using finite element methods”, Medical Engineering & Physics, Vol.28, No. 2, pp. 114–121.
  10. Zhang, M., Lord, M., Turner-Smith, A.R. and Roberts, V.C., 1995, “Development of a non-linear finite element modelling of the below-knee prosthetic socket interface”, Medical Engineering & Physics, Vol.17, No. 8, pp. 559-566.
  11. Jia, X., Zhang, M., Li, X. and Lee, W.CC. (2005).A quasi-dynamic nonlinear finite element model to investigate prosthetic interface stresses during walking for trans-tibial amputees. Clinical Biomechanics. ; Vol 20, No. 6, pp. 630–635.
  12. Haberman, A., “Mechanical Properties of Dynamic Energy Return Prosthetic Feet”, MSc. Thesis: Queen’s University Kingston, Ontario, Canada, 2008.
  13. Figueroa, R. and Müller-Karger, C.M., “Using FE for Dynamic Energy Return Analysis of Prosthetic Feet during Desing Process”, In 25th Southern Biomedical Engineering Conference, Miami, Florida, USA, 2009, pp. 289-292.
  14. M. Viceconti, S. Olsen, L.-P. Nolte and K. Burton, "Extracting clinically relevant data from finite element simulations," Clinical Biomechanics, Vol. 20, pp. 451–454, 2005.
  15. International Organization for Standardization. ISO 10328:2006 Prosthetics: Structural testing of lower-limb prostheses: requirements and test methods.
  16. International Organization for Standardization. ISO 22675:2006 Prosthetics: Testing of ankle-foot devices and foot units: requirements and test methods.
  17. Z. D. Mason, J. Pearlman, R. A. Cooper, and J. Z. Laferrier, “Comparison of prosthetic feet prescribed to active individuals using ISO standards,” Prosthetics and Orthotics International, Vol. 35, No. 4, pp. 418–424, Oct. 2011.
  18. H. Goujon, X. Bonnet, P. Sautreuil, M. Maurisset, L. Darmon, P. Fode, and F. Lavaste, “A functional evaluation of prosthetic foot kinematics during lower-limb amputee gait,” Prosthetics and Orthotics International, Vol. 30, No. 2, pp. 213–223, August. 2006.
  19. A. ARYA, "A biomechanical comparison of the SACH, Seattle and Jaipur feet using ground reaction forces," Prosthetics and Orthotics International, Vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 37-45, April 1995.
  20. K. Postema, "Energy storage and release of prosthetic feet Part 1: Biomechanical analysis related to user benefits," Prosthetics and Orthotics International, Vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 17-27, April 1997.
  21. K. Postema, "Energy storage and release of prosthetic feet Part 2: Subjective ratings of 2 energy storing and 2 conventional feet, user choice of foot and deciding factor," Prosthetics and Orthotics Internat, Vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 28-34, April 1997.
  22. M. D. Geil, "Energy Loss and Stiffness Properties of Dynamic Elastic Response Prosthetic Feet," Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics, Vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 70-73, 2001.
  23. A. Schmitz, “Stiffness analyses for the design development of aprosthetic foot”, MSc. Thesis: University Of Wisconsin-Madison, 2007.
  24. A. Haberman, T. Bryant, M. Beshai, and R. Gabourie, “Mechanical Characterization Of Prosthetic Feet,” in 12th World Congress of the International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics, Vancouver, Canada, 2007, p. 374.
  25. DuPont Inc. [Online], Available from: http://dupont.materialdatacenter.com/profiler/main/standard/main/ds, Nov 2015
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Finite Element Niagara foot Stiffness.

Powered by PhDFocusTM