CFP last date
20 May 2024
Reseach Article

Comparative Analysis of Page Ranking Algorithms in Digital Libraries

by Suruchi Nehra, Deepti Gaur
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 137 - Number 3
Year of Publication: 2016
Authors: Suruchi Nehra, Deepti Gaur
10.5120/ijca2016908660

Suruchi Nehra, Deepti Gaur . Comparative Analysis of Page Ranking Algorithms in Digital Libraries. International Journal of Computer Applications. 137, 3 ( March 2016), 17-23. DOI=10.5120/ijca2016908660

@article{ 10.5120/ijca2016908660,
author = { Suruchi Nehra, Deepti Gaur },
title = { Comparative Analysis of Page Ranking Algorithms in Digital Libraries },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { March 2016 },
volume = { 137 },
number = { 3 },
month = { March },
year = { 2016 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 17-23 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume137/number3/24255-2016908660/ },
doi = { 10.5120/ijca2016908660 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T23:37:53.737163+05:30
%A Suruchi Nehra
%A Deepti Gaur
%T Comparative Analysis of Page Ranking Algorithms in Digital Libraries
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 137
%N 3
%P 17-23
%D 2016
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

Page ranking algorithms are important facet of ranking the articles in online digital libraries. Researchers utilize the digital libraries for their research and to find popular, recent and relevant articles in their domain. Ranking plays crucial role in searching, as there are millions of articles present in academic digital libraries, there is a need to order them so that users can find propitious articles efficiently. This paper presents a study and a comparative review of various ranking algorithms in online digital libraries under different web mining techniques based on their scope, performance, advantages and challenges. The paper also shows that how some of the drawbacks of certain algorithms are met by other proposed algorithms. This comparative analysis helps in further improvements in the related field.

References
  1. Total number of Websites Internet Live Stats, http://www.internetlivestats.com/total-number-of-websites/
  2. Internet World Stats – Usage and Population Statistics ,www.internetworldstats.com
  3. Kumar,V.Vijay,P.Rama MohanRao,Digitization of Library Resources and the Formation of Digital Libraries: A Practical Approach, International Journal& Magazine of Engineering, Technology, Management and Research, Volume No: 1, Issue No: 12 ,2014,pp69-71.
  4. Beel, Jöran, Bela Gipp, Google Scholar's ranking algorithm:the impact of citation counts (an empirical study),Third International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science, 2009, pp. 439–446.
  5. Merton, Robert K,The Matthew effect in science, Science Vol.159. No.3810,1968 ,pp 56-63
  6. Page, S. Brin, R. Motwani, T. Winograd,The Pagerank Citation Ranking: Bringing order to the Web, Technical report, Stanford Digital Libraries SIDL-WP-1999-0120, 1999
  7. Sobek M, The effect of outbound links, Internet paper, http://pr.efactory.de/e-outbound- links.shtml.
  8. L. Marian, M. Rajman, Ranking Scientific Publications Based on Their Citation Graph,Master Thesis, CERNTHESIS,2009.
  9. Krapivin, Mikalai, and Maurizio Marchese,Focused page rank in scientific papers ranking , Digital Libraries: Universal and Ubiquitous Access to Information,Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2008, pp. 144-153.
  10. S. Qiaot, T. Li, H. Li, Y. Zhu, J. Pengt , J. Qiu, SimRank: A Page Rank Approach based on Similarity Measure, 2010 International Conference on Intelligent Systems and Knowledge Engineering (ISKE) ,IEEE 2010, pp. 390-395.
  11. D. A. Grossman and O. Frieder, Information Retrieval: Algorithms and Heuristics. Springer, Secaucus, NJ, USA, 2004.
  12. G. Salton and M. McGill, An Introduction to Modern Information Retrieval, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, 1983
  13. K. Wen, R. Li, J. Xia and X.Gu, Optimizing ranking method using social annotations based on language model, Artificial Intelligence Review, 2014,41(1) ,pp.81-96
  14. V. T. NGUYEN, Using social annotation and web log to enhance search engine, International Journal of Computer Science Issues, IJCSI, Volume 6, Issue 2, 2009, pp1-6.
  15. Sayyadi, Hassan and Lise Getoor ,Futurerank: Ranking scientific articles by predicting their future pagerank,Proceedings of the Ninth SIAM International Conference on Data Mining (SDM’09),2009,pp. 533–544.
  16. Kleinberg J,Authorative Sources in a Hyperlinked Environment, Proceedings of the 23rd annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval(46) ,no. 5,1999,pp 604-632.
  17. Yujing Wang, Yunhai Tong, Ming Zeng, Ranking Scientific Articles by Exploiting Citations, Authors, Journals, and Time Information, Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence,2013,pp.933-939.
  18. P. Thwe., Proposed Approach For Web Page Access Prediction Using Popularity And Similarity Based Page Rank Algorithm,international journal of scientific & technology research, vol. 2, no. 3,2013,pp. 240-246
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Digital Libraries Page Ranking Search Engine Web Usage Mining Web Content Mining Web Structure Mining.