Call for Paper - January 2023 Edition
IJCA solicits original research papers for the January 2023 Edition. Last date of manuscript submission is December 20, 2022. Read More

A Comparative Study of Techniques for Bone Age Assessment using Image Processing

International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Year of Publication: 2016
Simerjeet Kaur

Simerjeet Kaur. A Comparative Study of Techniques for Bone Age Assessment using Image Processing. International Journal of Computer Applications 148(13):38-41, August 2016. BibTeX

	author = {Simerjeet Kaur},
	title = {A Comparative Study of Techniques for Bone Age Assessment using Image Processing},
	journal = {International Journal of Computer Applications},
	issue_date = {August 2016},
	volume = {148},
	number = {13},
	month = {Aug},
	year = {2016},
	issn = {0975-8887},
	pages = {38-41},
	numpages = {4},
	url = {},
	doi = {10.5120/ijca2016911217},
	publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
	address = {New York, USA}


Bone age assessment is an innovation which empowers us to determination the age bone with the help PC picture preparing and assessment of the computerized perceptions. In this review paper we have reviewed various methods for bone age assessment like active shape modeling random forest regression method, Greulich & Pyle method, Tanner and Whitehouse method and RUS method with their advantages and disadvantages. All of the above methods provide effective assistance in processing phase of the bone age assessment.


  1. Yuh, Y.S., Liu, C.C., Chang, J.D. and Yu, S.S., 2012, July. Later stage bone age assessment on hand radiographs. In Industrial Electronics and Applications (ICIEA), 2012 7th IEEE Conference on (pp. 1329-1332). IEEE.
  2. Wu, P.C. and Vashishth, D., 2002. Age-related changes in cortical bone toughness: initiation vs. propagation. In Engineering in Medicine and Biology, 2002. 24th Annual Conference and the Annual Fall Meeting of the Biomedical Engineering Society EMBS/BMES Conference, 2002. Proceedings of the Second Joint (Vol. 1, pp. 425-426). IEEE.
  3. Sonar, A.V., Carroll, J.J., Sabini, L. and Issen, K.A., 2008, May. Simulation of bone aging and virtual reality visualization of cancellous bone structure. In Electrical and Computer Engineering, 2008. CCECE 2008. Canadian Conference on (pp. 001317-001322). IEEE.
  4. Al-Taani, A.T., Ricketts, I.W. and Cairns, A.Y., 1996, October. Classification of hand bones for bone age assessment. In Electronics, Circuits, and Systems, 1996. ICECS’96. Proceedings of the Third IEEE International Conference on (Vol. 2, pp. 1088-1091). IEEE.
  5. Badiei, A., Bottema, M.J. and Fazzalari, N.L., 2005, December. Expected and observed changes to architectural parameters of trabecular bone with aging-A comparison of measurement techniques. In Digital Image Computing: Techniques and Applications, 2005. DICTA'05. Proceedings 2005(pp. 71-71). IEEE.
  6. Stern, D., Ebner, T., Bischof, H. and Urschler, M., 2014, April. Determination of legal majority age from 3D magnetic resonance images of the radius bone. In Biomedical Imaging (ISBI), 2014 IEEE 11th International Symposium on(pp. 1119-1122). IEEE.
  7. Shaikhina, T., Khovanova, N.A. and Mallick, K.K., 2014, June. Artificial neural networks in hard tissue engineering: another look at age-dependence of trabecular bone properties in osteoarthritis. In Biomedical and Health Informatics (BHI), 2014 IEEE-EMBS International Conference on (pp. 622-625). IEEE.
  8. Cootes, T.F., Taylor, C.J., Cooper, D.H. and Graham, J., 1995. Active shape models-their training and application. Computer vision and image understanding, 61(1), pp.38-59.
  9. Lindner, C., Bromiley, P.A., Ionita, M.C. and Cootes, T.F., 2015. Robust and Accurate Shape Model Matching using Random Forest Regression-Voting. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, IEEE Transactions on 37(9), pp.1862.1874.
  10. S. A. Adeshina. Automatic Detennination of Skeletal Maturity using Statistical Models of appearance. PhD thesis, University of Manchester, 2010.
  11. S. A. Adeshina and T F. Cootes. Constructing part-based models for groupwise registration. In Proc. IEEE International Syposium on Biomedical Imaging, 2010.
  12. S. A. Adeshina, T F. Cootes, and J. Adams. Evaluating different structures for predicting skeletal maturity using statistical appearance models. In Proc. MIUA 2009, 2009.
  13. S. A. Adeshina, T F. Cootes, and J. Adams. Evaluating the use of carpal bones for determination of skeletal maturity for infants. In Proc. MIUA 2010, 2010.
  14. T F. Cootes, G. J. Edwards, and C. J. Taylor. Active appearance models. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 23(6):681-685, 2001.
  15. T F. Cootes, C. J. Taylor, D. Cooper, and J. Graham. Active shape models - their training and application. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 61(1):38-59, Jan. 1995.
  16. D.Cristinacce and TF.Cootes. Automatic feature localization with constrained local models. Pattern Recognition, 41(10):3054-3067, 2008.
  17. D. Giordano, C. Spampinato, G. Scarciofalo, and R. Leonardi. An automatic system for skeletal bone age measurement by robust processing of carpal and epiphysial/metaphysial bones. Instrumentation and Measurement, IEEE Transactions on, 59(10):2539-2553, October 2010.
  18. C. Hsieh, T Liu, and T Jong. A fuzzy-based growth model with principle component analysis selection for carpal boneage assessment. Med Bioi Eng Compute, 48(6):579-588, 2010.
  19. C. Lindner, S. Thiagarajah, J. M. Wilkinson, G. A. Wallis, and T F. Cootes. Accurate fully automatic femur segmentation in pelvic radiographs using regression voting. In MICCAI, pages 353-360, 2012.
  20. Spampinato, C., 1995. Skeletal Bone Age Assessment. University of Catania, Viale Andrea Doria, 6, p.95125.


Bone age, Regression, Region of interest (ROIs), Fragment, Carpal Bone, Wrist Bone, Radiographic.