CFP last date
22 April 2024
Call for Paper
May Edition
IJCA solicits high quality original research papers for the upcoming May edition of the journal. The last date of research paper submission is 22 April 2024

Submit your paper
Know more
The week's pick
Responsive image
Enhancing Privacy Preservation: Multi-Attribute Protection with P-Sensitive K-Anonymity

Twinkle Patel Kiran Amin
Random Articles
Reseach Article

User-Centric Evaluation of Government of Kenya Online Services: The Case of iTax

by Judith Adem Owigar, Elijah Isanda Omwenga
journal cover thumbnail

International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 148 - Number 8
Year of Publication: 2016
Authors: Judith Adem Owigar, Elijah Isanda Omwenga
10.5120/ijca2016911252

Judith Adem Owigar, Elijah Isanda Omwenga . User-Centric Evaluation of Government of Kenya Online Services: The Case of iTax. International Journal of Computer Applications. 148, 8 ( Aug 2016), 17-23. DOI=10.5120/ijca2016911252

@article{ 10.5120/ijca2016911252,
author = { Judith Adem Owigar, Elijah Isanda Omwenga },
title = { User-Centric Evaluation of Government of Kenya Online Services: The Case of iTax },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { Aug 2016 },
volume = { 148 },
number = { 8 },
month = { Aug },
year = { 2016 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 17-23 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume148/number8/25777-2016911252/ },
doi = { 10.5120/ijca2016911252 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T23:52:48.910245+05:30
%A Judith Adem Owigar
%A Elijah Isanda Omwenga
%T User-Centric Evaluation of Government of Kenya Online Services: The Case of iTax
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 148
%N 8
%P 17-23
%D 2016
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

National and local governments have been working to use Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) to increase citizen participation in their operations. While many of these efforts have been driven from a government perspective, the users’ needs, motivations and behavior have been largely ignored. This paper explores a user-centric approach to e-governance and looks at how user perspectives and attitudes affect adoption of online government services. A user-centric evaluation model of online government services was developed in this research. The iTax online system, which facilitates electronic filing of tax returns in Kenya, was selected as a case study. The research framework was based on the technology acceptance models focusing on the aspects of perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use. Interviews, questionnaires and a usability study were used to collect data. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used to analyze the qualitative data, while coding and usability metrics were used to analyze the quantitative data. The findings show that to increase the adoption of online government services, governments need to focus their strategies on addressing the needs of their users, their attitudes towards to the electronic services, and respond to the identified needs appropriately.

References
  1. Business Daily. 2013. K.R.A. Carrying Out Pilot Tests On More Efficient Tax System. [Online] Available from: http://www.businessdailyafrica.com/KRA-carrying-out-pilot-tests-on-more-efficient-tax-system/-/539546/1660004/-/j3phryz/-/index.html 
[Accessed: 7th July 2016].
  2. Government of Kenya, 2014. Income Tax Act. Nairobi: Government of Kenya, pp. 103-104.
  3. Verdegem, P. and Verleye, G. 2009. “User-centered E-Government in practice: A comprehensive model for measuring user satisfaction”, Government Information Quarterly, vol 26, pp. 487–497
  4. Bertot, J. C., & Jaeger, P. T. 2006. User-centered E-Government: Challenges and benefitsfor government web sites. Government Information Quarterly, 23(2), 163−168.
  5. Bicking, M., Janssen, M. and Wimmer, M.A., 2006. Looking into the future: scenarios for e-government in 2020. In Project e-society: Building Bricks (pp. 392-404). Springer US.
  6. Riad, A., El-Bakry, M. & El-Adl, G. 2010.A Novel DSS Framework for E-Government,International Journal of Computer Science Issues, 7 (6). 33–37.
  7. Dillon, Stuart; Deakins, Eric; Hofmann, Sara; Räckers, Michael; and Kohlborn, Thomas, "A Longitudinal Study of Local E- Government Development: The Policy Maker Perspective". 2015. ECIS 2015 Completed Research Papers. Paper 37.
ISBN 978-3-00-050284-2
  8. Ntiro, S. 2000. eGovernment in Eastern Africa, KPMG, Dar-es-Salaam
  9. Creighton, J.L., 2005. The public participation handbook: Making better decisions through citizen involvement. John Wiley & Sons.
  10. Arnstein, S.R., 1969. A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of planners, 35(4), pp.216-224.
  11. Reinsalu, K., 2010. Handbook On E-Democracy. Tampere: Tampereen Yliopistopaino Oy Juvenes Print, pp 9.
  12. Osborne, D., &Gaebler, T. 1992. Reinventing government: How the entrepreneurialspirit is transforming the public sector. Reading: Addison-Wesley.
  13. Tat-Kei Ho, A. 2002. Reinventing local governments and the E-Government initiative. Public Administration Review, 62(4), 434−444.
  14. Chatfield, A. T. & AlHujran, O. 2007. E-government evaluation: a user-centric perspective for public value proposition. In H. Arabnia & A. Bahrami (Eds.), International Conference on e-Learning, e-Business, Enterprise Information Systems, and eGovernment (pp. 53-59). USA: CSREA Press.
  15. Heeks, R., 2006, July. Understanding and measuring eGovernment: international benchmarking studies. In UNDESA workshop,“E-Participation and E-Government: Understanding the Present and Creating the Future”, Budapest, Hungary, pp. 27-28.
  16. Otieno, I. and Omwenga, E., 2014, May. Towards the development of a citizen-centric framework for evaluating the impact of eGovernment: A case study of developing countries. In IST-Africa Conference Proceedings, 2014(pp. 1-9). IEEE.
  17. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., &Warshaw, P. R. 1989. User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982−1003.
  18. Venkatesh, V. and Davis, F.D., 2000. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management science, 46(2), pp.186-204.
  19. Venkatesh, V., 2000. Determinants of perceived ease of use: Integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Information systems research, 11(4), pp.342-365.
  20. Venkatesh, V. and Bala, H., 2008. Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision sciences, 39(2), pp.273-315.
  21. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B. and Davis, F.D., 2003. User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS quarterly, pp.425-478.
  22. Fishbein, M. and Ajzen, I., 1977. Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research.
  23. Hartwick, J. and Barki, H., 1994. Explaining the role of user participation in information system use. Management science, 40(4), pp.440-465.
  24. McFarland, D.J. and Hamilton, D., 2006. Adding contextual specificity to the technology acceptance model. Computers in human behavior, 22(3), pp.427-447.
  25. Zhang, J., 2013. Towards a citizen-centered e-government: Exploring citizens' satisfaction with e-government in China (Doctoral dissertation, NORTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY).
  26. Nielsen, J., 2012. Why you only need to test with 5 users, 2000. Jakob Nielsen’s Alertbox. Available on line from www. useit. com/alertbox/20000319. html.
  27. Nation Media Group, 2014. 1.6 million taxpayers now on K.R.A. online tax payment system. [Online] Available from: http://www.nation.co.ke/business/1-3-million-taxpayers-now-on-K.R.A.-online-tax-payment-system/-/996/2763392/-/108u8ke/-/index.html
[Accessed: 26th January 2016].
  28. Krejcie, R.V., & Morgan, D.W. 1970. Determining Sample Size for Research Activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

User-centric government-centric e-government public participation iTax users citizens usability

Powered by PhDFocusTM