CFP last date
20 March 2024
Reseach Article

Comparison of Keyword based Clustering of Web Documents by using OPENSTACK 4J and by Traditional Method

by Shiza Anand, Pradeep Pant, Mukesh Rawat
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 156 - Number 9
Year of Publication: 2016
Authors: Shiza Anand, Pradeep Pant, Mukesh Rawat
10.5120/ijca2016912583

Shiza Anand, Pradeep Pant, Mukesh Rawat . Comparison of Keyword based Clustering of Web Documents by using OPENSTACK 4J and by Traditional Method. International Journal of Computer Applications. 156, 9 ( Dec 2016), 39-45. DOI=10.5120/ijca2016912583

@article{ 10.5120/ijca2016912583,
author = { Shiza Anand, Pradeep Pant, Mukesh Rawat },
title = { Comparison of Keyword based Clustering of Web Documents by using OPENSTACK 4J and by Traditional Method },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { Dec 2016 },
volume = { 156 },
number = { 9 },
month = { Dec },
year = { 2016 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 39-45 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume156/number9/26741-2016912583/ },
doi = { 10.5120/ijca2016912583 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-07T00:02:12.106574+05:30
%A Shiza Anand
%A Pradeep Pant
%A Mukesh Rawat
%T Comparison of Keyword based Clustering of Web Documents by using OPENSTACK 4J and by Traditional Method
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 156
%N 9
%P 39-45
%D 2016
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

As the number of hypertext documents are increasing continuously day by day on world wide web. Therefore, clustering methods will be required to bind documents into the clusters (repositories) according to the similarity lying between the documents. Various clustering methods exist such as: Hierarchical Based, K-means, Fuzzy Logic Based, Centroid Based etc. These keyword based clustering methods takes much more amount of time for creating containers and putting documents in their respective containers. These traditional methods use File Handling techniques of different programming languages for creating repositories and transferring web documents into these containers. In contrast, openstack4j SDK is a new technique for creating containers and shifting web documents into these containers according to the similarity in much more less amount of time as compared to the traditional methods. Another benefit of this technique is that this SDK understands and reads all types of files such as jpg, html, pdf, doc etc. This paper compares the time required for clustering of documents by using openstack4j and by traditional methods and suggests various search engines to adopt this technique for clustering so that they give result to the user queries in less amount of time.

References
  1. Kevin Jackson and Cody Bunch, “OpenStack Cloud Computing Cookbook”, Second Edition, 2001, Page No.400
  2. Tom Fifield, Diane Fleming & Joe Topjian, “OpenStack Operations Guide” by O’Reilly Publications, @itarchitectkev, openstack.prov12n.com
  3. John Rhoton,Jan De Clercq, Franz Novak, “OpenStack Cloud Computing”, Architecture Guide, 2014 Edition, Recursive Press Publications, March11, 2014
  4. Dan Radez, “OpenStack Essentials”,PACKT Publishing, 2012, www,PacktPub.com
  5. Charu C.Aggarwal, “Data Clustering Algorithms & Applications”, January1, 2013.
  6. Junjie Wu, “Adances In K-Means Clustering”, January1, 2012.
  7. Sewell, Grandville, and P.J. Rousseau, “Finding groups in data: An introduction to cluster analysis”, 1990,2005, Page no,223
  8. Ipeirotis, P., Gravano, L. & Mehran, S. (2001), ‘Probe, count, and classify: categorizing web databases’, ACM SIGMOD 30(2), 67 – 78.
  9. Omar Khedher, ” Mastering OpenStack”, Packt Publishing, www,PacktPub.com
  10. IBM-Object Storage, www.ibm.com/object-storage/ , Date: 18.05.2016, Time: 11.30am
  11. [11 Object Storage- IBM Bluemix, https://console.ng.bluemix.net/object-storage/ Date:29.05.2016, Time: 10.00am.
  12. I.Ceema, M.Kavitha, G.Renukadevi, G.sripriya, S. RajeshKumar, “Clustering Web Documents using Hierarchical Method for Efficient Cluster Formation”, International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science and Electronics Engineering, Volume 1, Issue 5, November 2012, ISSN: 2277 – 9043,
  13. Wei Xu, Xin Liu, Yihong Gong, “Document Clustering Based On Non-negative Matrix Factorization”,
  14. Rajendra Kumar Roul, Omanwar Rohit Devanand, S. K. Sahay, ”Web Document Clustering and Ranking using Tf-Idf based Apriori Approach”,
  15. Oren Zamir and Oren Etzioni,“Web Document Clustering: A Feasibility Demonstration”, SIGIR’98, Melbourne, Australia 1998 ACM 1-58113-015-5 8/98,
  16. Hua-Jun Zeng, Qi-Cai He, Zheng Chen, Wei-Ying Ma, Jinwen Ma, “Learning to Cluster Web Search Results”, SIGIR’04, July 25–29, 2004, Sheffield, South Yorkshire, UK., ACM 1-58113-881-4/04/0007,
  17. Yongzheng Zhang Evangelos Milios Nur Zincir-Heywood, “A Comparison of Word- and Term-based Methods for Automatic Web Site Summarization”, WWW2004, May 17–22, 2004, New York, NY USA, ACM,
  18. Mohammad Rezaei and Pasi Fränti, “Matching Similarity for Keyword-based Clustering”, adfa, p. 1, 2011. © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Clustering openstack4j K-Means centroid based document-matching