Call for Paper - August 2022 Edition
IJCA solicits original research papers for the August 2022 Edition. Last date of manuscript submission is July 20, 2022. Read More

Design and Analysis of Circular Polarized Receiver Antenna as Video Stabilizer in UHF Television

Print
PDF
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Year of Publication: 2020
Authors:
Jovy Rexiramdhan, Farid Thalib
10.5120/ijca2020920836

Jovy Rexiramdhan and Farid Thalib. Design and Analysis of Circular Polarized Receiver Antenna as Video Stabilizer in UHF Television. International Journal of Computer Applications 175(30):12-18, November 2020. BibTeX

@article{10.5120/ijca2020920836,
	author = {Jovy Rexiramdhan and Farid Thalib},
	title = {Design and Analysis of Circular Polarized Receiver Antenna as Video Stabilizer in UHF Television},
	journal = {International Journal of Computer Applications},
	issue_date = {November 2020},
	volume = {175},
	number = {30},
	month = {Nov},
	year = {2020},
	issn = {0975-8887},
	pages = {12-18},
	numpages = {7},
	url = {http://www.ijcaonline.org/archives/volume175/number30/31640-2020920836},
	doi = {10.5120/ijca2020920836},
	publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
	address = {New York, USA}
}

Abstract

In analog terrestrial television systems received video disturbances often occurs. Polarization parameters and radiation patterns are important things that are rarely considered in television antenna systems. In addition, the Pulse synchronize parameter on the CVBS signal can be a reference for the ongoing video stability. Researchers conducted an experiment by designing and analyzing the characteristics of a circular polarized Skew Planar Wheel (SPW) antenna and comparing it with a Dipole antenna which has linear polarization. Both of these antennas have omnidirectional radiation and are implemented parallel as analog terrestrial television receiver antennas at UHF frequencies. The test is performed by rotating the antenna tilt angle at 0º, 45º, 90º horizontally and 45º and 90º vertically to the direction of the transmitter. The lowest VSWR at the center frequency of 642 MHz SPW antenna is obtained 1.5 while for Dipole 1.04. The maximum S-parameter value of SPW is -13.86 dB while the Dipole is -34.03 dB. The maximum Gain of the SPW antenna is 1.38 dB while the Dipole has a greater maximum Gain of 2.21 dB. Based on the test results, it is known that the SPW antenna can help stabilize the amplitude value of the Pulse synchronize parameter to remain around -300mV at all test angles, this makes the video displayed on television stable. Whereas for the Dipole antenna there are disturbances at the testing angle 90º horizontally and 45º, 90º vertically. In addition, there is no ghost image when using SPW antenna compared to Dipole.

References

  1. Christiyono, Y., Santoso, I., Setiawan, B. 2009. “Design Antenna 5/8λ Circular Polarized at VHF Band (30-300 MHz)”. Teknik Elektro, 53-59. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.12777/transmisi.11.1.53-59.
  2. C. A. Balanis. 2005. Antena Theory Analysis And Design. John Wiley & Sons.
  3. Olabi, O.. Oladeji, E. A. 2018. “Effects of Rain on Vertical and Horizontal Polarized Ku- Band Radio Propagation in Tropical Region”. International Journal of Computer Science Trends and Technology (IJCST), 6(1).
  4. Ogherohwo, E. P.. Barnabas, B. 2015. “Design, Construction and Performance Analysis of Helical Antena Operating at 5.8Ghz”. Int. J. Advanced Research in Physical Science (IJARPS.), 2(11). www.arcjournals.org.
  5. Tektronix. 2009. “A Guide to Standard and High-Definition Digital Video Measurements,” Primer, pp. 18 - 22, U.S.
  6. Miawarni, H., Setijadi, E. 2016. “Antena tracking system based on pulse of synchronization CVBS”: Design system and analyze. 2016 International Electronics Symposium (IES). doi:10.1109/elecsym.2016.7861007.
  7. Miawarni, H., Hidayat, M. M., Sumpeno, S., Setijadi, E. 2017. “Tracking system for indoor TV antena based on CVBS signal processing”. Jurnal Elektronika dan Telekomunikasi, 17(2), 48. doi:10.14203/jet.v17.48-55.
  8. Yaqin, A. A., Santoso, I., Prakoso, T. 2016. “Design Antenna Skew-Planar for Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Communicatiob at Frequency 2,4 Ghz”.
  9. Circular or linear polarized antena for FPV (n.d) [Online]. 2020. Available: https://oscarliang.com/linear-circular-polarized-antena-fpv/
  10. Prakoso, T., Yaqin, A. A., Ibrahim. Santoso, I., Triwiyatno, A., Riyadi, M. A. 2017. “Evaluation Of Cloverleaf Antena For UAV Communication At 2.4 Ghz Band” [Paper presentation]. Int. Conf. Electrical Engineering Computer Science And Informatics. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/755/1/01100.
  11. Romadhona, S., Alia, D., & Zulfida, M. “Design and Analisys Dipole Antenna at 2,4 GHz Frequency for Modul Xbee S2 Pro using HFFS 14.0”. 2020. AVITEC, 2.
  12. Reckeweg, M. 2014. Antena Basics White Paper [8GEP WP01]. [Online]. Available: https://home.zhaw.ch/kunr/NTM1/literatur/Rhode_Schwarz_Antena_Basics.pdf
  13. C. A .Balanis. 2016. Antena theory Analysis and design (4th ed.).
  14. Akbar, P. R., Tetuko, J. S. S., Kuze, H. 2010. “A novel circularly polarized synthetic aperture radar (CP-SAR) system onboard a spaceborne platform”. Int. J. Remote Sensing., 31(4), 1053-1060. doi:10.1080/01431160903156528.
  15. Radio Frequency Master Plan for the Operation of Special Telecommunications for the Purposes of Analog Broadcast Television on Ultra High Frequency Bands (31). 2014. Retrieved from Minister of Communication and Informatics of the Republic of Indonesia [Online]. Available: https://jdih.kominfo.go.id/produk_hukum/unduh/id/230/t/peraturan+menteri+komunikasi+dan+informatika+nomor+31+tahun+2014+tanggal+22+september+2014.
  16. Tareq, M., Alam, D. A., Islam, M. M., Ahmed, R. 2014. “Simple half-wave Dipole antena analysis for wireless applications by CST microwave studio”. Int. J. Computer Applications., 94(7), 21-23. doi:10.5120/16355-5734.

Keywords

Antenna, SPW, Dipole, Pulse Synchronize, Polarization.