CFP last date
20 May 2024
Call for Paper
June Edition
IJCA solicits high quality original research papers for the upcoming June edition of the journal. The last date of research paper submission is 20 May 2024

Submit your paper
Know more
The week's pick
Responsive image
Enhancing Privacy Preservation: Multi-Attribute Protection with P-Sensitive K-Anonymity

Twinkle Patel Kiran Amin
Random Articles
Reseach Article

Adoption of Mobile Technology Application at a Technical University in Ghana

by Noble Arden Kuadey, Lily Bensah, Carlos Ankora, Francois Mahama, Victor Kwaku Agbesi, Newman Kpogo Newman
journal cover thumbnail

International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 175 - Number 31
Year of Publication: 2020
Authors: Noble Arden Kuadey, Lily Bensah, Carlos Ankora, Francois Mahama, Victor Kwaku Agbesi, Newman Kpogo Newman
10.5120/ijca2020920871

Noble Arden Kuadey, Lily Bensah, Carlos Ankora, Francois Mahama, Victor Kwaku Agbesi, Newman Kpogo Newman . Adoption of Mobile Technology Application at a Technical University in Ghana. International Journal of Computer Applications. 175, 31 ( Nov 2020), 7-13. DOI=10.5120/ijca2020920871

@article{ 10.5120/ijca2020920871,
author = { Noble Arden Kuadey, Lily Bensah, Carlos Ankora, Francois Mahama, Victor Kwaku Agbesi, Newman Kpogo Newman },
title = { Adoption of Mobile Technology Application at a Technical University in Ghana },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { Nov 2020 },
volume = { 175 },
number = { 31 },
month = { Nov },
year = { 2020 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 7-13 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume175/number31/31647-2020920871/ },
doi = { 10.5120/ijca2020920871 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-07T00:39:57.427388+05:30
%A Noble Arden Kuadey
%A Lily Bensah
%A Carlos Ankora
%A Francois Mahama
%A Victor Kwaku Agbesi
%A Newman Kpogo Newman
%T Adoption of Mobile Technology Application at a Technical University in Ghana
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 175
%N 31
%P 7-13
%D 2020
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

This study seeks to examine determinants that can influence students intention to use a mobile technology application. To examine these determinants, this study adopted mobile service acceptance model that have constructs such as context, personal characteristics and initiatives, trust, perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and intention to use. A sample of 170 students from Ho Technical University (HTU) experimented with HTU GPA mobile technology application after which a questionnaire was administered. Partial least square structural equation modeling (PLSSEM) was used in analyzing data that was collected. The results from the study showed that trust, perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use have significant effect on students intention to adopt HTU GPA mobile technology application. Trust had the most significant effect on students intention to adopt the mobile technology application. Context had significant effect on perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use which indirectly influenced students intention to adopt the application. The results from this study provide both researchers and practitioners insights into determinants that impact students adoption of mobile technology application in a university. For researchers, this study contributes to existing literature on intention of students to adopt a mobile technology application while for practitioners it helps them gain a better insight into what key features to consider during the design and development of mobile technology applications.

References
  1. K. Taylor and L. Silver, “Smartphone ownership is growing rapidly around the world, but not always equally,” Pew Research Center, vol. 5, 2019.
  2. E. Dahlstrom and J. Bichsel, “Ecar study of undergraduate students and information technology, 2014.” Educause, 2014.
  3. M. B. Kobus, P. Rietveld, and J. N. Van Ommeren, “Ownership versus on-campus use of mobile it devices by university students,” Computers & Education, vol. 68, pp. 29–41, 2013.
  4. H. Farley, A. Murphy, C. Johnson, B. Carter, M. Lane, W. Midgley, A. Hafeez-Baig, S. Dekeyser, and A. Koronios, “How do students use their mobile devices to support learning? a case study from an australian regional university.” Journal of Interactive Media in Education, vol. 2015, no. 1, 2015.
  5. A. Addo, “The adoption of mobile phone: how has it changed us socially?” Issues in Business Management and Economics, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 47–60, 2013.
  6. M. A. Tagoe and E. Abakah, “Determining distance education students’ readiness for mobile learning at university of ghana using the theory of planned behavior.” International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 91–106, 2014.
  7. J. K. Edumadze and N. A. Kuadey, “Studentsperception of mobile learning at university of cape coast, ghana,” The Online Journal of Distance Education and e-Learning, vol. 7, no. 3, p. 226, 2019.
  8. S.-S. Liaw, M. Hatala, and H.-M. Huang, “Investigating acceptance toward mobile learning to assist individual knowledge management: Based on activity theory approach,” Computers & Education, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 446–454, 2010.
  9. I. M. Al-Jabri and M. S. Sohail, “Mobile banking adoption: Application of diffusion of innovation theory,” Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 379–391, 2012.
  10. M. Reid and Y. Levy, “Integrating trust and computer selfefficacy with tam: An empirical assessment of customers˜a¢ ˆa ˆa acceptance of banking information systems (bis) in jamaica,” The Journal of Internet Banking and Commerce, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 1–18, 1970.
  11. M.-I. R. M. Jaradat and A. M. Al-Mashaqba, “Understanding the adoption and usage of mobile paytowards an understanding of the consumer acceptance of mobile walletment services by using tam3,” International Journal of Business Information Systems, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 271–296, 2014.
  12. S. AlAwadhi and A. Morris, “The use of the utaut model in the adoption of e-government services in kuwait,” in Proceedings of the 41st annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences (HICSS 2008). Ieee, 2008, pp. 219–219.
  13. D.-H. Shin, “Towards an understanding of the consumer acceptance of mobile wallet,” Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 1343–1354, 2009.
  14. S. G. Yaseen and S. Zayed, “Exploring determinants in deploying mobile commerce technology: Amman stock exchange,” in 2010 International Conference on Information Society. IEEE, 2010, pp. 612–620.
  15. C. Buabeng-Andoh, “Exploring university students intention to use mobile learning: A research model approach,” Education and information technologies, pp. 1–16, 2020.
  16. M. A. Almaiah, M. A. Jalil, and M. Man, “Preliminary study for exploring the major problems and activities of mobile learning system: A case study of jordan,” 2016.
  17. M. Al-Emran, V. Mezhuyev, and A. Kamaludin, “Technology acceptance model in m-learning context: A systematic review,” Computers & Education, vol. 125, pp. 389–412, 2018.
  18. B. A. Kumar and S. S. Chand, “Mobile learning adoption: A systematic review,” Education and Information Technologies, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 471–487, 2019.
  19. A. Qashou, “Influencing factors in m-learning adoption in higher education,” Education and Information Technologies, pp. 1–31, 2020.
  20. S. I. Senaratne, S. M. Samarasinghe, and G. Jayewardenepura, “Factors affecting the intention to adopt m-learning,” Int. Bus. Res, vol. 12, no. 2, p. 150, 2019.
  21. F. Martin and J. Ertzberger, “Here and now mobile learning: An experimental study on the use of mobile technology,” Computers & Education, vol. 68, pp. 76–85, 2013.
  22. C.-M. Chao, “Factors determining the behavioral intention to use mobile learning: An application and extension of the utaut model,” Frontiers in psychology, vol. 10, p. 1652, 2019.
  23. M. A. Almaiah, M. M. Alamri, and W. Al-Rahmi, “Applying the utaut model to explain the students acceptance of mobile learning system in higher education,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 174 673–174 686, 2019.
  24. M. A. Almaiah and A. Al Mulhem, “Analysis of the essential factors affecting of intention to use of mobile learning applications: A comparison between universities adopters and nonadopters,” Education and Information Technologies, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 1433–1468, 2019.
  25. J. K. Fatima, P. Ghandforoush, M. Khan, and R. D. Mascio, “Mobile learning adoption for tourism education in a developing country,” Current issues in Tourism, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 420–427, 2019.
  26. M. A. Almaiah and O. A. Alismaiel, “Examination of factors influencing the use of mobile learning system: An empirical study,” Education and Information Technologies, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 885–909, 2019.
  27. F. Aburub and I. Alnawas, “A new integrated model to explore factors that influence adoption of mobile learning in higher education: An empirical investigation,” Education and Information Technologies, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 2145–2158, 2019.
  28. H. Al-Shihi, S. K. Sharma, and M. Sarrab, “Neural network approach to predict mobile learning acceptance,” Education and Information Technologies, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 1805–1824, 2018.
  29. M. A. Almaiah, “Acceptance and usage of a mobile information system services in university of jordan,” Education and Information Technologies, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 1873–1895, 2018.
  30. H. Hamidi and A. Chavoshi, “Analysis of the essential factors for the adoption of mobile learning in higher education: A case study of students of the university of technology,” Telematics and Informatics, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 1053–1070, 2018.
  31. E. Pramana, “Determinants of the adoption of mobile learning systems among university students in indonesia,” Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, vol. 17, pp. 365–398, 2018.
  32. S. Gao, J. Krogstie, and P. A. Gransæther, “Mobile services acceptance model,” in 2008 International Conference on Convergence and Hybrid Information Technology. IEEE, 2008, pp. 446–453.
  33. S. Gao and J. Krogstie, “The importance of context towards mobile services adoption,” in The Fourth International Conference on Mobile Ubiquitous Computing, Systems, Services and Technologies (Ubicomm 2010), 2010.
  34. S. Figge, “Situation-dependent servicesa challenge for mobile network operators,” Journal of Business Research, vol. 57, no. 12, pp. 1416–1422, 2004.
  35. N. Mallat, M. Rossi, V. K. Tuunainen, and A. Oorni, “The impact of use situation and mobility on the acceptance of mobile ticketing services,” in Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS’06), vol. 2. IEEE, 2006, pp. 42b–42b.
  36. B. Wu and X. Chen, “Continuance intention to use moocs: Integrating the technology acceptance model (tam) and task technology fit (ttf) model,” Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 67, pp. 221–232, 2017.
  37. B. Wu and C. Zhang, “Empirical study on continuance intentions towards e-learning 2.0 systems,” Behaviour & Information Technology, vol. 33, no. 10, pp. 1027–1038, 2014.
  38. J. Lu, J. E. Yao, and C.-S. Yu, “Personal innovativeness, social influences and adoption of wireless internet services via mobile technology,” The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 245–268, 2005.
  39. F. D. Davis, “Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology,” MIS quarterly, pp. 319–340, 1989.
  40. C. M. Jackson, S. Chow, and R. A. Leitch, “Toward an understanding of the behavioral intention to use an information system,” Decision sciences, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 357–389, 1997.
  41. R. Agarwal and J. Prasad, “Are individual differences germane to the acceptance of new information technologies?” Decision sciences, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 361–391, 1999.
  42. V. Venkatesh, “Creation of favorable user perceptions: Exploring the role of intrinsic motivation,” MIS quarterly, pp. 239–260, 1999.
  43. S. Gao, J. Krogstie, M. Asif, and N. Kuadey, “An empirical study of mobile information services adoption at a norwegian university,” in International Conference on Electronic Business, Shanghai, China, 2010.
  44. S. Gao, P. C. Røinend, and J. Krogstie, “The adoption of mobile tourism services: an empirical study,” in Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Advances in Mobile Computing & Multimedia, 2012, pp. 47–56.
  45. R. Agarwal and J. Prasad, “A conceptual and operational definition of personal innovativeness in the domain of information technology,” Information systems research, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 204–215, 1998.
  46. J. B. Thatcher, D. H. McKnight, E. W. Baker, R. E. Arsal, and N. H. Roberts, “The role of trust in postadoption it exploration: An empirical examination of knowledge management systems,” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 56–70, 2010.
  47. S. Gao, J. Krogstie, and K. Siau, “Developing an instrument to measure the adoption of mobile services,” Mobile information systems, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 45–67, 2011.
  48. W.W. Chin et al., “The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling,” Modern methods for business research, vol. 295, no. 2, pp. 295–336, 1998.
  49. G. Ursachi, I. A. Horodnic, and A. Zait, “How reliable are measurement scales? external factors with indirect influence on reliability estimators,” Procedia Economics and Finance, vol. 20, pp. 679–686, 2015.
  50. J. F. Hair Jr, G. T. M. Hult, C. Ringle, and M. Sarstedt, A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage publications, 2016.
  51. L.-t. Hu and P. M. Bentler, “Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives,” Structural equation modeling: a multidisciplinary journal, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–55, 1999.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Adoption Determinants Mobile Service Acceptance Model Mobile Technology Application University

Powered by PhDFocusTM