CFP last date
20 May 2024
Call for Paper
June Edition
IJCA solicits high quality original research papers for the upcoming June edition of the journal. The last date of research paper submission is 20 May 2024

Submit your paper
Know more
The week's pick
Responsive image
Enhancing Privacy Preservation: Multi-Attribute Protection with P-Sensitive K-Anonymity

Twinkle Patel Kiran Amin
Random Articles
Reseach Article

Identifying and Studying the Interrelationships amongst Various Challenges in Successful Implementation of IoT to Military and Defence Systems in India

by Mukesh Bansal, Lakshay Aggarwal, Arnav Jain, Remica Aggarwal
journal cover thumbnail

International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 176 - Number 11
Year of Publication: 2020
Authors: Mukesh Bansal, Lakshay Aggarwal, Arnav Jain, Remica Aggarwal
10.5120/ijca2020920088

Mukesh Bansal, Lakshay Aggarwal, Arnav Jain, Remica Aggarwal . Identifying and Studying the Interrelationships amongst Various Challenges in Successful Implementation of IoT to Military and Defence Systems in India. International Journal of Computer Applications. 176, 11 ( Apr 2020), 37-43. DOI=10.5120/ijca2020920088

@article{ 10.5120/ijca2020920088,
author = { Mukesh Bansal, Lakshay Aggarwal, Arnav Jain, Remica Aggarwal },
title = { Identifying and Studying the Interrelationships amongst Various Challenges in Successful Implementation of IoT to Military and Defence Systems in India },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { Apr 2020 },
volume = { 176 },
number = { 11 },
month = { Apr },
year = { 2020 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 37-43 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume176/number11/31249-2020920088/ },
doi = { 10.5120/ijca2020920088 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-07T00:42:16.637336+05:30
%A Mukesh Bansal
%A Lakshay Aggarwal
%A Arnav Jain
%A Remica Aggarwal
%T Identifying and Studying the Interrelationships amongst Various Challenges in Successful Implementation of IoT to Military and Defence Systems in India
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 176
%N 11
%P 37-43
%D 2020
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

Internet of Things (IoT) is undeniably transforming the way that organizations communicate and organize everyday businesses and industrial procedures. Its adoption has proven well suited for sectors that manage a large number of assets and coordinate complex and distributed processes. As far as Military and Defence is concerned , an IoT-enabled, seamless supply chain can help the Department of Defense (DoD) achieve end-to-end asset visibility to ensure the right supplies are delivered to the right location at the right time. This will ensure decision-makers have timely and accurate information on the location, condition, and status of critical supplies, ranging from equipment, weapons and spare parts to food, fuel, and medical supplies. However despite these benefactors , successful implementation of IoT is still a challenge in most of the developing countries including India particularly in military and defence sector .The objective of the paper is therefore to first identify various barriers or challenges to successful implementation of IoT in military and defence and thereafter to study the interrelationship amongst them using ISM methodology.

References
  1. D. Zheng , W.A. Carter, Leveraging the IoT for a more Efficient and Effective Military. Rowman & Littlefield; Lanham, MD, USA: 2015. Technical Report.
  2. A. Al-Fuqaha , M. Guizani , M. Mohammadi , M. Aledhari , M. Ayyash. Internet of things: A survey on enabling technologies, protocols, and applications. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 2015;17:2347–2376. doi: 10.1109/COMST.2015.2444095.
  3. D. Miorandi , S. Sicari , F.D. Pellegrini ,I. Chlamtac , Internet of things: Vision, applications and research challenges. Ad Hoc Netw. 2012;10:1497–1516. doi: 10.1016/j.adhoc.2012.02.016.
  4. L.Atzori , A. Iera, G. Morabito, The internet of things: A survey. Comput. Netw. 2010;54:2787–2805. doi: 10.1016/j.comnet.2010.05.010.
  5. Akyildiz , I.F. , Jornet, J.M. 2010. The Internet of nano-things. IEEE Wirel. Commun., 17, 58–63. doi: 10.1109/MWC.2010.5675779.
  6. Lee ,H.,Yoo , S., Kim ,Y.W. 2016. An energy management framework for smart factory based on context-awareness; Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Advanced Communication Technology (ICACT); Pyeongchang, Korea. 685–688.
  7. Manyika ,J.,Chui, M., Bisson,P., Woetzel ,J., Dobbs , R., Bughin , J. and Aharon, D. 2015. The Internet of Things: Mapping the Value beyond the Hype. McKinsey Global Institute; Washington, DC, USA. Technical Report.
  8. Ericsson . Ericsson Mobility Report on the Pulse of the Networked Society. Ericsson; Stockholm, Sweden: Nov, 2015. Technical Report.
  9. Business Insider (BI) Intelligence . The Internet of Things: Examining How the IoT Will Affect the World. Business Insider; New York, NY, USA: 2015. Technical Report.
  10. Zanella ,A. , Bui , N., Castellani ,A., Vangelista ,L., Zorzi ,M. Internet of things for smart cities. IEEE Internet Things J. 2014;1:22–32. doi: 10.1109/JIOT.2014.2306328.
  11. Al-Fuqaha , A., Guizani, M., Mohammadi ,M., Aledhari , M., Ayyash , M. 2015. Internet of things: A survey on enabling technologies, protocols, and applications. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor, 17, 2347–2376. doi: 10.1109/COMST.2015.2444095.
  12. Chudzikiewicz , J., Furtak , J., Zielinski , Z. 2015. Fault-tolerant techniques for the Internet of Military Things; Proceedings of the IEEE 2nd World Forum on Internet of Things (WF-IoT); Milan, Italy. 496–501.
  13. Yushi , L., Fei , J.,Hui , Y. 2012. Study on application modes of military Internet of Things (MIOT); Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Science and Automation Engineering (CSAE); Zhangjiajie, China. 630–634.
  14. Zheng , D., Carter , W.A. 2015. The Internet of Things for Defense. Wind River Systems; Alameda, CA, USA. . Technical Report.
  15. Mariani , J. Williams, B. Loubert, B. 2015. Continuing the March: The Past, Present, and Future of the IoT in the Military. Deloitte University Press; Deloitte, UK. Technical report.
  16. Suri , N., Tortonesi , M., Michaelis ,J., Budulas, P. , Benincasa , G. Russell , S., Stefanelli, C., Winkler , R. 2016. Analyzing the applicability of internet of things to the battlefield environment; Proceedings of the International Conference on Military Communications and Information Systems (ICMCIS), Brussels, Belgium.
  17. Wrona, K. 2015. Securing the Internet of Things a military perspective; Proceedings of the IEEE 2nd World Forum on Internet of Things (WF-IoT), Milan, Italy. 502–507.
  18. Eom, J. 2015. Security threats recognition and countermeasures on smart battlefield environment based on IoT. Int. J. Secur. Appl., 9, 347–356. doi: 10.14257/ijsia.2015.9.7.32.
  19. Alqassem I. , Svetinovic , D. 2014. A taxonomy of security and privacy requirements for the Internet of Things (IoT); Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management; Bandar Sunway, Malaysia. 1244–1248.
  20. Trusted Computing Group, Guidance for Securing IoT Using TCG Technology, Version 1.0, Revision 21. http://www.trustedcomputinggroup.org/wp-content/uploads/TCG_Guidance_for_Securing_IoT_1_0r21.pdf.
  21. Warfield, J.N. 1974. Developing interconnection matrices in structural modelling. IEEE Transactions on System, Man, and Cybernetics, SMC-4 (1), 81-87.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Internet of Things (IoT) ISM Methodology Military & Defence

Powered by PhDFocusTM