CFP last date
20 June 2024
Reseach Article

Demography of Startup Software Companies: An Empirical Investigation on the Success and Failure

by Kaniz Fatema, M.M. Mahbubul Syeed, M. Saef Ullah Miah
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 176 - Number 29
Year of Publication: 2020
Authors: Kaniz Fatema, M.M. Mahbubul Syeed, M. Saef Ullah Miah
10.5120/ijca2020920313

Kaniz Fatema, M.M. Mahbubul Syeed, M. Saef Ullah Miah . Demography of Startup Software Companies: An Empirical Investigation on the Success and Failure. International Journal of Computer Applications. 176, 29 ( Jun 2020), 1-8. DOI=10.5120/ijca2020920313

@article{ 10.5120/ijca2020920313,
author = { Kaniz Fatema, M.M. Mahbubul Syeed, M. Saef Ullah Miah },
title = { Demography of Startup Software Companies: An Empirical Investigation on the Success and Failure },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { Jun 2020 },
volume = { 176 },
number = { 29 },
month = { Jun },
year = { 2020 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 1-8 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume176/number29/31381-2020920313/ },
doi = { 10.5120/ijca2020920313 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-07T00:43:44.847252+05:30
%A Kaniz Fatema
%A M.M. Mahbubul Syeed
%A M. Saef Ullah Miah
%T Demography of Startup Software Companies: An Empirical Investigation on the Success and Failure
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 176
%N 29
%P 1-8
%D 2020
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

Startup software company can be envisage as a company committed to deliver innovative solution to market with four primary objectives, namely, product, service, process and platform. Software startups are quite distinct from traditional mature software companies. These companies develop state-of-the-art, software-intensive products within limited time frames and with few resources. They also introduce new challenges relevant to software engineering research which in turn lead to ample set of empirical investigation on the topic. This research is targeted to offer a systematic literature survey on the scientific investigations carried out on Startup software companies, specifically concentrating on their success and failure parameters and strategies to encounter symptoms of failure.

References
  1. Kitchenham B. A., Pretorius R., Budgen D., Brereton O. P., Turner M., Niazi M. and Linkman S. 2010. Systematic literature reviews in software engineering- a tertiary study, IST, vol. 52, no. 8, pp. 792805.
  2. Mahbubul Syeed M. M., Hammouda I. and Systa T. 2013. Evolution of Open Source Software Projects: A Systematic Literature Review, Journal of Software, Vol.8, No.11.
  3. Kitchenham B. and Charters S. 2007. Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software. Engineering Technical Report EBSE-2007-01.
  4. Petticrew M. and Roberts H. 2005. Systematic reviews in the social sciences: A practical guide. Blackwell Publishing.
  5. Cornelissen B. , Zaidman A., Deursen A., Moonen L. and Koschke R. 2009. A systematic survey of program comprehension through dynamic analysis. TSE, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 684 –702.
  6. Catal C. and Diri B. 2009. A systematic review of software fault prediction studies. Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 73467354.
  7. Mite D.,Wohlin C., Gorschek T., and Feldt R. 2010. Empirical evidence in global software engineering: a systematic review. ESE, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 91118.
  8. Jansen s., Finkelstein A. , and Brinkkemper s. 2009. A sense of community: A research agenda for software ecosystems. International Conference on Software Engineering.
  9. Vasilis Boucharas, Slinger Jansen, and Sjaak Brinkkemper. 2009. Formalizing software ecosystem modeling. In Proceedings of the 1st international workshop on Open component ecosystems (IWOCE 09). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 4150.
  10. Jansen S., Brinkkemper S., Hunink I., and Demir C. 2008. Pragmatic and opportunistic reuse in innovative start-up companies. Software, IEEE, 25(6):4249.
  11. Brinkkemper S., van Soest I. and Jansen S. 2007. Modeling of Product Software Businesses: Investigation into Industry Product and Channel Typologies, pages 119.
  12. Smagalla, D. 2004. The truth about software startups. MIT Sloan Manage. Rev. (USA) 45(2).
  13. Blank, S. 2005. The four steps to the epiphany, 1st edn. Cafe- Press.
  14. Crowne, M. 2002. Why software product startups fail and what to do about it. In: Proceedings International Engineering Management Conference (IEMC), pp. 338 343.
  15. Sutton, S.M. 2000. The role of process in software start-up. IEEE Software 17(4), Pages 3339.
  16. Giardino C., Wang X., Abrahamsson P. 2014. Why Early- Stage Software Startups Fail: A Behavioral Framework. In: Lassenius C., Smolander K. (eds) Software Business. Towards Continuous Value Delivery. ICSOB 2014. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 182. Springer.
  17. Fairlie R.W. 2014. Kauffman Index of Entrepreneurial Activity, Kauffman Foundation.
  18. Nobel C. 2011. Why Companies Fail - and How Their Founders Can Bounce Back. Harvard Business School.
  19. Paternoster N., Giardino C., Unterkalmsteiner M., Gorschek T. and Abrahamsson P. 2014. Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study, Inf. Softw. Technol.
  20. Giardino C., Unterkalmsteiner M., Paternoster N., Gorschek T. and Abrahamsson P. 2014. What Do We Know about Software Development in Startups?. in IEEE Software, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 28-32.
  21. Ries, E. 2011. The Lean Startup: How Todays Entrepreneurs Use Continuous Innovation to Create Radically Successful Businesses. Crown Business.
  22. Kurtz C. F. and Snowden D. J. 2003. The new dynamics of strategy: Sense-making in a complex and complicated world. IBM Syst. J., vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 462 483.
  23. Yu Y.-W., Chang Y.-S., Chen Y.-F. and Chu L.-S. 2012. Entrepreneurial success for high-tech start-ups - Case study of Taiwan high-tech companies, in Proceedings - 6th International Conference on Innovative Mobile and Internet Services in Ubiquitous Computing. pp. 933 937.
  24. Carmel E. 1994. Time-to-completion in software package startups. Proc. 27th Hawaii Int. Conf. Syst. Sci. HICSS, pp. 498507.
  25. Sutton S. M. 2000. The role of process in software start-up. IEEE Softw., vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 3339.
  26. Jalali I. 2016. Connecting Asia’s startup ecosystem, Article, in Tech in Asia.
  27. Krishna A., Agrawal A. and Choudhary A. 2016. Predicting the Outcome of Startups: Less Failure, More Success. IEEE 16th International Conference on Data Mining Workshops.
  28. Coleman G. and OConnor R. 2008. An investigation into software development process formation in software start-ups. J. Enterp. Inf. Manag., vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 633648.
  29. Brooks F. 1995. The Mythical Man Month, Addison Wesley, 2nd Ed, pp.255-257.
  30. McGrath M. 2000. Product Strategy for High Technology Companies, McGraw-Hill Education, 2nd Edition, pp.53-89.
  31. US Census Bureau. 2014. US Department of Commerce, Business Dynamics Statistics. https://www.census.gov/ces/dataproducts/bds.
  32. Stanley M. S. and EC Cubed Jr. 2000. The role of process in a software Start-Up.
  33. Robehmed N. 2014. What Is A Startup?, Business Insider.
  34. Stephen D.H.T. and Tzu-Tang Lan. 1984. Development of a Startup Business - A Complexity, In Theory Perspective - Research Gate.
  35. Abrar A.S. and Maheshwari S. 1998. Entrepreneurial Characteristics and Strategic Choices of New Venture Firms, Twelfth AIMS International Conference on Management.
  36. Sauka A. and Chepurenko A. 2017. Entrepreneurship in Transition Economies Diversity, Trends, and Perspectives, OCED.
  37. Thomas, E. B. 2000. The failure of success: challenges of disseminating effective substance abuse preventions programs, Journal of Community Psychology.
  38. Fayad M.E., Laitinen M. and Robert P. Ward. 2000. Software Engineering in the Small, Communications of the ACM.
  39. Karlheinz K. 2001. Knowledge, Learning and IT support in a small software company, Journal of Knowledge Management.
  40. Chau T. and Frank Maurer F. 2001. A Case Study of Wikibased Experience Repository at a Medium-sized Software Company, Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on Knowledge capture.
  41. Crowne M. 2002. Why software product startups fail and what to do about it Evolution of software product development in startup companies, Proceedings of The International Engineering.
  42. Schick H., Marxen S. and Freiman J. 2002. Sustainability Issues for Start-up Entrepreneurs, Greener Management International.
  43. Himola O. P., Helo P., Ojala L. 2003. The Value of Product Development Lead Time in Software Startup, System Dynamics Review.
  44. Paternoster N., Giardino C., Unterkalmsteiner M. and Gorschek T. 2014. Supplementary material to Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study, In International Conference of Software Business, pp. 27-41.
  45. Boehm B., Guo L., Huang. 2003. Value-Based Software Engineering: A Case Study, IEEE Computer, 36 (3).
  46. Gelderen M.V., Thurik R., Bosma N. 2005. Success and Risk Factors in the Pre-Startup Phase, Small Business Economics, 24(4), pp 365-380.
  47. Martin D., Rooksby J., Rouncefield M. and Sommerville I. 2007. Good Organisational Reasons for Bad Software Testing: An Ethnographic Study of Testing in a Small Software Company, ICSE Proceedings of the 29th international conference on Software Engineering, pp 602-611.
  48. Oktaba P., Piattini M. 2008. Software Process Improvement for Small and Medium Enterprises: Techniques and Case Studies, ACM Digital Library.
  49. Nann S., Krauss J., Schober M., Peter A. Gloor, Fischbacha K. and Hauke Fuhr. The Power of Alumni Networks -Success of Startup Companies CorrelatesWith Online Social Network Structure of Its Founders, MIT Sloan School Working Paper 4766-10.
  50. Barbosa O., Alves C. 2011. A Systematic Mapping Study on Software Ecosystem, Proceedings of the Workshop on Software Ecosystems.
  51. Swamidass P.M. 2012. University startups as a commercialization alternative: lessons from three contrasting case studies, The Journal of Technology Transfer.
  52. Bosch J., Olsson H.H., Bjork J. and Ljungblad J. 2013. The Early Stage Software Startup Development Model: A Framework for Operationalizing Lean Principles in Software Startups, LESS, LNBIP 167, pp. 1-15.
  53. Marciuska S., Gencel C. and Abrahamsson P. 2013. Exploring How Feature Usage Relates to Customer Perceived Value: A Case Study in a Startup Company, ICSOB, LNBIP 150, PP.166-177.
  54. Abelein H., Sharp H. and Paech B. 2013. Does Involving Users in Software Development Really Influence System Success?, IEEE Software, 30(6).
  55. Mason C., Brown R. 2014. Entrepreneurial ecosystems and growth oriented entrepreneurship, OCED.
  56. Fagerholm F., Paasivaara M., Jedlitschka A., Kuvaja P., Kuhrmann M., Tomi M annist .o, J urgen M uch, and Raatikainen M. 2014. Product-Focused Software Process Improvement, 15th International Conference, PROFES Helsinki, Finland.
  57. Verbovskii V.A. 2014. Basics of successful startup development in the field of innovation, Journal of Economics and Social Sciences.
  58. Klotins E., Unterkalmstenier M. and Gorschek T. 2014. Software Engineering Knowledge Areas in Startup Companies: a mapping study, Blekinge Institute of Technology.
  59. Lose T., Tengeh R.K. 2015. The Sustainability and Challenges of Business Incubators in the Western Cape Province, South Africa, Sustainability, pp 14344-14357.
  60. Unterkalmsteinera M., Abrahamssonb P., XiaoFeng Wangc, Anh Nguyen-Duca, Syed Shahd, Sohaib Shahid Bajwac, Guido H. Baltese, Kieran Conboyf, Eoin Cullinaf, Denis Dennehyf, Edisonc H. and others. 2016. Software Startups A Research Agenda, e-Informatica Software Engineering Journal, 10(1), pp: 89123.
  61. Nobel, C. 2011. Why companies fail and how their founders can bounce back. Working knowledge.
  62. Rainer H. 2015. Self-regulated learning, team learning and project performance in entrepreneurship education: Learning in a lean startup environment, Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 100: 2128.
  63. Kuhn D. 1989. Selecting and effectively using a computer aided software engineering tool, in: Annual Westinghouse Computer Symposium.
  64. Kakati M. 2003. Success criteria in high-tech new ventures, Technovation, 23(5), pp 447457.
  65. Yoo C., Yang D., Kim H. and Heo E. 2012. Key Value Drivers of Startup Companies in the New Media Industry-The Case of Online Games in Korea, Journal of Media Economics 25(4), pp 244260.
  66. Midler C. and Silberzahn P. 2008. Managing robust development process for high-tech startups through multi-project learning: The case of two European start-ups, International Journal of Project Management, 26(5), pp 479486.
  67. Taipale M. 2010. Huitale - A story of a Finnish lean startup, Lean Enterprise Software and Systems, Vol. 65 of Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, pp. 111114.
  68. da Silva A. and Kon F. 2005. Xp south of the equator: An experience implementing XP in Brazil, Extreme Programming and Agile Processes, pp 1018.
  69. Coleman G. and OConnor R. 2007. Using grounded theory to understand software process improvement: A study of Irish software product companies, Information and Software Technology 49(6), pp 654667.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Startup Software Startup company Software Development Success Failure Systematic Literature Review Investor Management