Notification: Our email services are now fully restored after a brief, temporary outage caused by a denial-of-service (DoS) attack. If you sent an email on Dec 6 and haven't received a response, please resend your email.
CFP last date
20 December 2024
Reseach Article

Development of Multimedia Interactive Computer-based and Mobile-based Learning: Case Studies in the Learning of Logic

by Muhammad Rusli, Anggun Nugroho
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 176 - Number 8
Year of Publication: 2017
Authors: Muhammad Rusli, Anggun Nugroho
10.5120/ijca2017915594

Muhammad Rusli, Anggun Nugroho . Development of Multimedia Interactive Computer-based and Mobile-based Learning: Case Studies in the Learning of Logic. International Journal of Computer Applications. 176, 8 ( Oct 2017), 8-14. DOI=10.5120/ijca2017915594

@article{ 10.5120/ijca2017915594,
author = { Muhammad Rusli, Anggun Nugroho },
title = { Development of Multimedia Interactive Computer-based and Mobile-based Learning: Case Studies in the Learning of Logic },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { Oct 2017 },
volume = { 176 },
number = { 8 },
month = { Oct },
year = { 2017 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 8-14 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume176/number8/28573-2017915594/ },
doi = { 10.5120/ijca2017915594 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-07T00:41:58.134410+05:30
%A Muhammad Rusli
%A Anggun Nugroho
%T Development of Multimedia Interactive Computer-based and Mobile-based Learning: Case Studies in the Learning of Logic
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 176
%N 8
%P 8-14
%D 2017
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

This research was the development research, i.e. developing a multimedia interactive learning over a matter of principle, that is, Logic. The learning strategy follows the Merrill's strategy (in Component Display Theory or CDT, especially those related to the rule relation between display), and the principle of animation (pointer animation) in learning via multimedia (multimedia, modality principle, spatial and temporal contiguity). The software of its development using the Authoring tool Adobe Captivate 9. The results of this research were two effective interactive multimedia learning modules (computer-based and mobile-based) that had the quality of good—very good. With the modules, the learner will have the option of learning and be more motivated (via a computer or mobile device) to learn independently repeatable and meaningful, such that the ability of the learner in applying concepts, procedures and basic principles of Logic can be achieved.

References
  1. Berkove, N. & Moore, B. 2001. Component Display Theory. Dalam K.L. Medsker & K.M. Holdsworth. Models and Strategies for Training Design. Silver Spring, MD: International Society for Performance Improvement.
  2. Clark, R.C. 2008. Developing Technical Training: A Structured Approach for Developing Classroom and Computer-Based Instructional Materials. Third Edition. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  3. Clark, R.C. & Mayer, R.E. 2008. E-Learning and The Science Of Instruction. Second Edition. San Francisco: In Print of Wiley.
  4. Dağ, F., Durdu, L. & Gerdan, S. 2014. Evaluation of Educational Authoring Tools for Teachers stressing of Perceived Usability Features. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 888- 901.
  5. Ivers, K.S & Barron, A.E. 2010. Multimedia Projects in Education: Designing, Producing, and Assessing. Fourth Edition. Santa Barbara, California: Libraries Unlimited.
  6. Khademi, M., Haghshenas, M. & Kabir, H. 2011. A Review On Authoring Tools. 5th International Conference on Distance Learning and Education. IPCSIT vol.12. Singapore. IACSIT Press.
  7. Lin, H. & Dwyer, F. M. 2010. The Effect of Static and Animated Visualization: a Perspective of Instructional Effectiveness and efficiency. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 58, 155-174.
  8. Mayer, R. E. & Moreno, R. 2003. Nine Ways to Reduce Cognitive Load in Multimedia Learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 43-52.
  9. Nasir, S.J.A., Asirvatham, D., & Khalid, H.H.M. 2012. Quality Framework for Assessment of Multimedia Learning Materials Version 1.0. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 67, 571-579.
  10. Nguyen, T. 2015. The Effectiveness of Online Learning: Beyond No Significant Difference and Future Horizons. Merlot Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 11(2), 309-319.
  11. Passerini, K. 2007. Performance and Behavioral Outcomes in Technology-Supported Learning: The Role of Interactive Multimedia. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 16(2), 183-211.
  12. Rusli, M. 2016. Implementasi Adobe Captivate dalam Pengembangan Multimedia Pembelajaran yang Efektif: Studi Kasus Pembelajaran Pemrograman Java. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Inovasi Pendidikan di Era Big Data dan Aspek Psikologinya. Pascasarjana, Universitas Negeri Malang.
  13. Rusli, M. & Rinartha, I.K. 2017. The Effect of Animation in Multimedia Computer-Based Learning and Learning Style to The Learning Results. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 18(4), 177-190.
  14. Tabbers, H.K. & de Koeijer, B. 2010. Learner Control in Animated Multimedia Instructions. Instructional Science, 38, 441-453.
  15. Wang, T.J. 2010. Educational Benefits of Multimedia Skills Training; TechTrends, 54(1), 47-57.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Multimedia learning pointer animation computer-based learning mobile-based learning