CFP last date
20 May 2024
Call for Paper
June Edition
IJCA solicits high quality original research papers for the upcoming June edition of the journal. The last date of research paper submission is 20 May 2024

Submit your paper
Know more
Reseach Article

iScrum: Effective Innovation Steering using Scrum Methodology

by Maruthi Rohit Ayyagari
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 178 - Number 10
Year of Publication: 2019
Authors: Maruthi Rohit Ayyagari
10.5120/ijca2019918812

Maruthi Rohit Ayyagari . iScrum: Effective Innovation Steering using Scrum Methodology. International Journal of Computer Applications. 178, 10 ( May 2019), 8-13. DOI=10.5120/ijca2019918812

@article{ 10.5120/ijca2019918812,
author = { Maruthi Rohit Ayyagari },
title = { iScrum: Effective Innovation Steering using Scrum Methodology },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { May 2019 },
volume = { 178 },
number = { 10 },
month = { May },
year = { 2019 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 8-13 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume178/number10/30565-2019918812/ },
doi = { 10.5120/ijca2019918812 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-07T00:49:59.930434+05:30
%A Maruthi Rohit Ayyagari
%T iScrum: Effective Innovation Steering using Scrum Methodology
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 178
%N 10
%P 8-13
%D 2019
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

Youth people are full-fledged with novel ideas. However, youth face several problems due to issues related to idea’s complexity and ambiguity, and youth lack of experience. An idea passes several steps to become mature. Afterward, it gains success. Therefore, mentoring youth people probably reduces complexity, ambiguity, and risk of idea failure. This paper proposes a Scrum software methodology, called the idea Scum (iScrum) model. The iScrum model mines initiatives guided by institution goals. The initiatives also called the idea backlog, traverses the idea during its incubation. At each step of the iScrum model, an idea drawn from the backlog is explored in phases. Once the idea becomes mature, it gets executed and evaluated, otherwise the iScrum iterate again for another phase of idea elaboration. The proposed model was compared with chosen creativity models over a set of innovative criteria. Results showed that the proposed model is superior. The iScrum model was also applied to a group of students. The model is considered applicable under organizational assets.

References
  1. S. Maranville, “Entrepreneurship in the business curriculum,” J. Educ. Bus., vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 27–31, 1992.
  2. D. Henriksen et al., “Creativity and Technology in Education: An International Perspective,” Technol. Knowl. Learn., vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 409–424, 2018.
  3. J. F. Uen, H.-C. Chang, D. McConville, and S.-C. Tsai, “Supervisory mentoring and newcomer innovation performance in the hospitality industry,” Int. J. Hosp. Manag., vol. 73, pp. 93–101, 2018.
  4. F. Szücs, “Research subsidies, industry--university cooperation and innovation,” Res. Policy, vol. 47, no. 7, pp. 1256–1266, 2018.
  5. M.-M. Judd and H. C. Blair, “Leveraging Agile Methodology to Transform a University Learning and Teaching Unit,” in Agile and Lean Concepts for Teaching and Learning, Springer, 2019, pp. 171–185.
  6. S. E. Carlson, D. G. Rees Lewis, E. M. Gerber, and M. W. Easterday, “Challenges of peer instruction in an undergraduate student-led learning community: bi-directional diffusion as a crucial instructional process,” Instr. Sci., vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 405–433, Jun. 2018.
  7. B. S. Selznick and M. J. Mayhew, “Measuring Undergraduates’ Innovation Capacities,” Res. High. Educ., vol. 59, no. 6, pp. 744–764, Sep. 2018.
  8. K. Schwaber, “Scrum development process,” in Business object design and implementation, Springer, 1997, pp. 117–134.
  9. A. F. Acosta, J. E. Espinosa, and J. Espinosa, “Application of the SCRUM Software Methodology for Extending Simulation of Urban MObility (SUMO) Tools,” in Simulating Urban Traffic Scenarios, Springer, 2019, pp. 3–15.
  10. L. B. Carneiro, A. Silva, and L. H. Alencar, “Scrum Agile Project Management Methodology Application for Workflow Management: A Case Study,” in 2018 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM), 2018, pp. 938–942.
  11. M. Madeja and M. Biňas, “Implementation of SCRUM Methodology in Programming Courses,” in 16th International Conference on Emerging eLearning Technologies and Applications (ICETA), 2018, pp. 333–340.
  12. J. Erickson, K. Lyytinen, and K. Siau, “Agile modeling, agile software development, and extreme programming: the state of research,” J. Database Manag., vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 88–100, 2005.
  13. G. A. Moore, Crossing the chasm: Marketing and selling technology project. Harper Collins, 2009.
  14. C. Christensen, M. Raynor, and R. McDonald, “Disruptive innovation.” Perseus Book LLC (Ingram), 2011.
  15. S. Kyffin and P. Gardien, “Navigating the innovation matrix: An approach to design-led innovation,” Int. J. Des., vol. 3, no. 1, 2009.
  16. R. Henderson and K. B. Clark, “Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms,” Adm. Sci. Q., 1990.
  17. C. M. Christensen, The innovator’s dilemma: when new technologies cause great firms to fail. Harvard Business Review Press, 2013.
  18. L. Keeley, H. Walters, R. Pikkel, and B. Quinn, Ten types of innovation: The discipline of building breakthroughs. John Wiley & Sons, 2013.
  19. L. Leydesdorff, “The triple helix: an evolutionary model of innovations,” Res. Policy, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 243–255, 2000.
  20. B. Godin, “The linear model of innovation: The historical construction of an analytical framework,” Sci. Technol. Hum. Values, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 639–667, 2006.
  21. M. Baghai, S. Coley, and D. White, The alchemy of growth. Basic Books, 2000.
  22. S. Eric, “The 70/20/10 Rule for Innovation.” 2015.
  23. C. M. Christensen, T. Hall, K. Dillon, and D. S. Duncan, “Know your customers’ jobs to be done,” Harv. Bus. Rev., vol. 94, no. 9, pp. 54–62, 2016.
  24. K. Sawyer, Group genius: The creative power of collaboration. Basic Books, 2017.
  25. P. A. Gloor, M. Paasivaara, D. Schoder, and P. Willems, “Finding collaborative innovation networks through correlating performance with social network structure,” Int. J. Prod. Res., vol. 46, no. 5, pp. 1357–1371, 2008.
  26. A. Mungiu-Pippidi, “Corruption: Good governance powers innovation,” Nat. News, vol. 518, no. 7539, p. 295, 2015.
  27. J. Dyer, H. Gregersen, and C. M. Christensen, The innovator’s DNA: Mastering the five skills of disruptive innovators. Harvard Business Press, 2011.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Scrum methodology Innovation incubation Creativity Software Engineering