CFP last date
20 May 2024
Call for Paper
June Edition
IJCA solicits high quality original research papers for the upcoming June edition of the journal. The last date of research paper submission is 20 May 2024

Submit your paper
Know more
The week's pick
Responsive image
Enhancing Privacy Preservation: Multi-Attribute Protection with P-Sensitive K-Anonymity

Twinkle Patel Kiran Amin
Random Articles
Reseach Article

Has the Implementation of Learning Management System Facilitated Faculty Pedagogy Change?

by Hannah Ayaba Tanye, Albert Akanlisikum Akanferi, Isaac Asampana
journal cover thumbnail

International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 178 - Number 27
Year of Publication: 2019
Authors: Hannah Ayaba Tanye, Albert Akanlisikum Akanferi, Isaac Asampana
10.5120/ijca2019918996

Hannah Ayaba Tanye, Albert Akanlisikum Akanferi, Isaac Asampana . Has the Implementation of Learning Management System Facilitated Faculty Pedagogy Change?. International Journal of Computer Applications. 178, 27 ( Jun 2019), 31-38. DOI=10.5120/ijca2019918996

@article{ 10.5120/ijca2019918996,
author = { Hannah Ayaba Tanye, Albert Akanlisikum Akanferi, Isaac Asampana },
title = { Has the Implementation of Learning Management System Facilitated Faculty Pedagogy Change? },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { Jun 2019 },
volume = { 178 },
number = { 27 },
month = { Jun },
year = { 2019 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 31-38 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume178/number27/30708-2019918996/ },
doi = { 10.5120/ijca2019918996 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-07T00:51:37.596041+05:30
%A Hannah Ayaba Tanye
%A Albert Akanlisikum Akanferi
%A Isaac Asampana
%T Has the Implementation of Learning Management System Facilitated Faculty Pedagogy Change?
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 178
%N 27
%P 31-38
%D 2019
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

Various research in literature on pedagogical change focused on the effect of professional development programs on pedagogical change. These researches focused on faculty resistance to change and teaching practice by faculty in the classrooms. Some universities in Ghana, have deployed Learning Management Systems (LMS) to aid in the pedagogy change. These universities have deployed various ways to get faculty to use the system but these have had little effect. The current research will focus on whether faculty is comfortable with technology provided to enable them change their pedagogy. The research will also look at their current pedagogical practices. The research will focus on higher educational institutions in Ghana using the University of Professional Studies as a case study. The research seeks to answer the question, “has the implementation of learning management system facilitated faculty pedagogy change?” The study used a quantitative method, specifically a survey was done with a sample of 98 faculty members from the University of Professional Studies, Accra. The study found that majority agreed that the Moodle features is averagely helpful to them, and also that the features of the systems has helped them in their teaching.

References
  1. Berendzen, J. C. (2009). Max Horkheimer
  2. Blin, F., & Munro, M. (2008). Why hasn’t technology disrupted academics’ teaching practices? Understanding resistance to change through the lens of activity theory. Computers & Education, 50(2), 475-490.
  3. Brownell, S. E., & Tanner, K. D. (2012). Barriers to faculty pedagogical change: Lack of training, time, incentives, and… tensions with professional identity? CBE-Life Sciences Education, 11(4), 339-346.
  4. Chawinga, W. D., & Zozie, P. A. (2016). Increasing access to higher education through open and
  5. disstance learning: Empirical findings from Mzuzu University, Malawi. The International
  6. Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(4).
  7. D’Avanzo, C. (2013). Post-vision and change: do we know how to change? CBE-Life Sciences Education, 12(3), 373-382.
  8. Dancy, M., & Henderson, C. (2008). Barriers and promises in STEM reform. In Henderson, Beach & Finkelstein (Eds.), In National Academies of Science Promising Practices Workshop.
  9. Dunn, L. (2016). Teaching and digital technologies: big issues and critical questions, edited by
  10. M. Henderson, and G. Romeo. Curriculum Journal, 27(4), 560-561.
  11. Ebert-May, D., Derting, T. L., Henkel, T. P., Maher, J. M., Momsen, J. L., Arnold, B., & Passmore, H. A. (2015). Breaking the cycle: Future faculty begin teaching with learner-centered strategies after professional development. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 14(2).
  12. Ebert-May, D., Derting, T. L., Hodder, J., Momsen, J. L., Long, T. M., & Jardeleza, S. E. (2011). What we say is not what we do: effective evaluation of faculty professional development programs. BioScience, 61(7), 550-558.
  13. Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS (3rd ed.). London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
  14. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis: A Global Prespective (7th ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Education.
  15. Henderson, C. (2008). Promoting instructional change in new faculty: An evaluation of the physics and astronomy new faculty workshop. American Journal of Physics, 76(2), 179-187.
  16. Henderson, C., & Dancy, M. H. (2007). Barriers to the use of research-based instructional strategies: The influence of both individual and situational characteristics. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 3(2), 020-102.
  17. Henderson, C., Finkelstein, N., & Beach, A. (2010). Beyond dissemination in college science teaching: An introduction to four core change strategies. Journal of College Science Teaching, 39(5), 18.
  18. Hou, S. I., & Wilder, S. (2015). Changing Pedagogy: Faculty Adoption of Service-Learning: Motivations, Barriers, and Strategies Among Service-Learning Faculty at a Public Research Institution. SAGE Open,, 5(1).
  19. Kotrlik, J. W. K. J. W., & Higgins, C. C. H. C. C. (2001). Organizational research: Determining appropriate sample size in survey research appropriate sample size in survey research. Information technology, learning, and performance journal, 19(1), 43.
  20. O'Hare, S. (2012). Why distance learning worked for me Retrieved January 3, 2019, from https://jobs.telegraph.co.uk/article/case-studies-why-distance-learning-worked-for-me/
  21. Pelch, M. A., & McConnell, D. A. (2016). Challenging instructors to change: A mixed methods investigation on the effects of material development on the pedagogical beliefs of geoscience instructors. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), 5.
  22. Ruiz, J. G., Mintzer, M. J., & Leipzig, R. M. (2006). The impact of e-learning in medical education. Academic medicine, 81(3), 207-212.
  23. Sekaran, U. (2003). Research Methods for Business: A Skill-Building Approach (4th ed.): John Wiley & Sons. Inc.
  24. SEND Ghana (2017) 2018 budget: SEND Ghana’s assessment points out 'serious concerns'
  25. https://www.myjoyonline.com/news/2017/november-17th/2018-budget-send-ghanas - assessment-points-out-serious-concerns.php
  26. Piattelli-Palmarini, Massimo (ed.) (1980). Language and Learning: The Debate Between Jean
  27. Piaget and Noam Chomsky_. Harvard University Press.
  28. Tagg, J. (2012). Why does the faculty resist change?. Change:. The Magazine of Higher Learning, 44(1), 6-15.
  29. Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

pedagogy Moodle learning management system teaching university theories

Powered by PhDFocusTM