CFP last date
22 April 2024
Reseach Article

Grammatical Error Correction (GEC): Research Approaches till now

by Sagar Ailani, Ashwini Dalvi, Irfan Siddavatam
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 178 - Number 40
Year of Publication: 2019
Authors: Sagar Ailani, Ashwini Dalvi, Irfan Siddavatam
10.5120/ijca2019919275

Sagar Ailani, Ashwini Dalvi, Irfan Siddavatam . Grammatical Error Correction (GEC): Research Approaches till now. International Journal of Computer Applications. 178, 40 ( Aug 2019), 1-3. DOI=10.5120/ijca2019919275

@article{ 10.5120/ijca2019919275,
author = { Sagar Ailani, Ashwini Dalvi, Irfan Siddavatam },
title = { Grammatical Error Correction (GEC): Research Approaches till now },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { Aug 2019 },
volume = { 178 },
number = { 40 },
month = { Aug },
year = { 2019 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 1-3 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume178/number40/30798-2019919275/ },
doi = { 10.5120/ijca2019919275 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-07T00:52:40.180748+05:30
%A Sagar Ailani
%A Ashwini Dalvi
%A Irfan Siddavatam
%T Grammatical Error Correction (GEC): Research Approaches till now
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 178
%N 40
%P 1-3
%D 2019
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

People all around the world attempts various entrance-level exams to test their proficiency in English. Most of these people are English as a Second Language (ESL) learners & some assistance from a teacher can be helpful in their progress, as they can provide continuous feedback on their writings. This process can be automated, and the process of detecting and correcting grammar errors in a text is called Grammatical Error Correction (GEC) in “Natural Language Processing” Domain. Three approaches have been used for solving GEC task, namely “Rule-based”, “Classification-based”, & “Machine Translation”, with Machine Translation further broken down into “Statistical Machine Translation” and “Neural Machine Translation”. The paper states how the researchers have used these approaches, and what setbacks or improvements in technologies paved the way for using better and more advanced approaches to GEC. It also states the understanding on how the GEC task can be improved, and what will be the tradeoffs for achieving higher performance in the future.

References
  1. Dahlmeier, D., Ng, H. T., and Wu, S. M., “Building a large annotated corpus of learner english: The nus corpus of learner english..” in BEA@ NAACL-HLT, pp. 22–31, 2013.
  2. Papineni, K., Roukos, S., Ward, T., and Zhu, W.-J., “Bleu: a method for automatic evaluation of machine translation,” in Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 311–318, 2002.
  3. Napoles, C., Sakaguchi, K., Post, M., and Tetreault, J., “Ground truth for grammatical error correction metrics,” in Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 7th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing, Vol. 2, pp. 588–593, 2015.
  4. Dahlmeier, D., and Ng, H. T., “Better evaluation for grammatical error correction,” in Proceedings of the 2012 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (Association for Computational Linguistics). pp. 568–572, 2012
  5. Bustamante, F. R., and León, F. S., “Gramcheck: A grammar and style checker,” in Proceedings of the 16th conference on Computational linguistics-Volume 1 (Association for Computational Linguistics). pp. 175–181, 1996.
  6. Ghosalkar, P., Malagi, S., Nagda, V., Mehta, Y., & Kulkarni, P,. English Grammar Checker, 2016.
  7. Han, N.-R., Chodorow, M., and Leacock, C., “Detecting errors in english article usage with a maximum entropy classifier trained on a large, diverse corpus..” in LREC, 2004.
  8. Rozovskaya, A., Chang, K.-W., Sammons, M., and Roth, D., “The university of illinois system in the conll-2013 shared task,” in Proceedings of the Seventeenth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning: Shared Task, pp. 13–19, 2013.
  9. Dahlmeier, D., and Ng, H. T., “A beam-search decoder for grammatical error correction,” in Proceedings of the 2012 Joint Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning (Association for Computational Linguistics). pp. 568–578, 2012.
  10. Mizumoto, T., Hayashibe, Y., Komachi, M., Nagata, M., and Matsumoto, Y., 2012, “The effect of learner corpus size in grammatical error correction of esl writings,” Proceedings of COLING 2012: Posters, 863–872.
  11. Brockett, C., Dolan, W. B., and Gamon, M., “Correcting esl errors using phrasal smt techniques,” in Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Computational Linguistics and the 44th annual meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Association for Computational Linguistics). pp. 249–256, 2006.
  12. Felice, M., Yuan, Z., Andersen, Ø. E., Yannakoudakis, H., and Kochmar, E., “Grammatical error correction using hybrid systems and type filtering..” in CoNLL Shared Task, pp. 15–24, 2014.
  13. Yuan, Z., and Briscoe, T., “Grammatical error correction using neural machine translation” in HLT-NAACL, pp. 380–386, 2016.
  14. Chollampatt, S. and Ng, H.T., April “A multilayer convolutional encoder-decoder neural network for grammatical error correction.” In Thirty-Second AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2018.
  15. Grundkiewicz, R. and Junczys-Dowmunt, M., “Near human-level performance in grammatical error correction with hybrid machine translation.” arXiv preprint arXiv:1804.05945, 2018.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Grammatical Error Correction (GEC) Machine Translation Natural Language.