CFP last date
22 April 2024
Call for Paper
May Edition
IJCA solicits high quality original research papers for the upcoming May edition of the journal. The last date of research paper submission is 22 April 2024

Submit your paper
Know more
The week's pick
Responsive image
Enhancing Privacy Preservation: Multi-Attribute Protection with P-Sensitive K-Anonymity

Twinkle Patel Kiran Amin
Random Articles
Reseach Article

Software Defined Networks – OpenFlow Channel Security and Efficiency

by Matthew West, Jihad Qaddour
journal cover thumbnail

International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 181 - Number 48
Year of Publication: 2019
Authors: Matthew West, Jihad Qaddour
10.5120/ijca2019918659

Matthew West, Jihad Qaddour . Software Defined Networks – OpenFlow Channel Security and Efficiency. International Journal of Computer Applications. 181, 48 ( Apr 2019), 42-46. DOI=10.5120/ijca2019918659

@article{ 10.5120/ijca2019918659,
author = { Matthew West, Jihad Qaddour },
title = { Software Defined Networks – OpenFlow Channel Security and Efficiency },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { Apr 2019 },
volume = { 181 },
number = { 48 },
month = { Apr },
year = { 2019 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 42-46 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume181/number48/30482-2019918659/ },
doi = { 10.5120/ijca2019918659 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-07T01:09:29.861411+05:30
%A Matthew West
%A Jihad Qaddour
%T Software Defined Networks – OpenFlow Channel Security and Efficiency
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 181
%N 48
%P 42-46
%D 2019
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

This paper assesses the resource costs of TLS in OpenFlow and puts forth a header format for channel communication that is more efficient and partially backwards-compatible. Resource usage is shown to be reduced by up to 19.36% with a TLS flag added to the OpenFlow header.

References
  1. A. Nygren et al., “OpenFlow switch specification version 1.5.1 (protocol version 0x06),” Open Networking Foundation, March 2015.
  2. S. Gowda, “Public certificates vs private certificates vs self-signed certificates, in MSDN Blogs, August 2017, https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/shreyasgowda/2017/08/18/public-certificates-vs-private-certificates-vs-self-signed-certificates/
  3. B. Laurie, “Certificate Transparency,” in Communications of the ACM, vol. 57, iss. 10, pp. 40-46, October 2014.
  4. A. Boldberg, “A comparison of HTTP and HTTPS performance,” Computer Measurement Group, CMG98 8, 1998.
  5. B. Jackson, “Analyzing HTTPS performance overhead,” keycdn, January 2017, https://www.keycdn.com/blog/https-performance-overhead/
  6. N. Lal and V. Garg, “Accelerating OpenSSL operations offloaded to hardware crypto accelerator,” in International Journal of Knowledge Based Computer Systems, vol. 4, iss. 1, pp. 30-33 Publishing India Group, 2016.
  7. C. Callegari, R. G. Garroppo, S. Giordano, and M. Pagano, “Security and delay issues in SIP systems,” in International Journal of Communications Systems, vol. 22, pp. 1023-1044, May 2009.
  8. C. Shen, E. Nahum, H. Schulzrinne, and C. Wright, “The impact of TLS on SIP server performance,” in IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 1217-1230, August 2012.
  9. L. Cornett, K. Grewal, M. Long, M. Miller, and S. Williams, “Network security: challenges and solutions,” Intel Technology Journal, vol. 13, iss. 2, pp. 112-129, Intel Corporation, June 2009.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

SDN OpenFlow channel security efficiency TLS header southbound SSL PKI DS xid Mininet encryption

Powered by PhDFocusTM