Call for Paper - December 2020 Edition
IJCA solicits original research papers for the December 2020 Edition. Last date of manuscript submission is November 20, 2020. Read More

Performance Analysis of Dynamic Routing Protocols in IPv6 and IPv4 Networks

Print
PDF
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Year of Publication: 2019
Authors:
Ayoub Bahnasse, Amine Taleb, Sohaib Lamkadmi, Achraf El Hassani
10.5120/ijca2019918703

Ayoub Bahnasse, Amine Taleb, Sohaib Lamkadmi and Achraf El Hassani. Performance Analysis of Dynamic Routing Protocols in IPv6 and IPv4 Networks. International Journal of Computer Applications 182(47):15-19, April 2019. BibTeX

@article{10.5120/ijca2019918703,
	author = {Ayoub Bahnasse and Amine Taleb and Sohaib Lamkadmi and Achraf El Hassani},
	title = {Performance Analysis of Dynamic Routing Protocols in IPv6 and IPv4 Networks},
	journal = {International Journal of Computer Applications},
	issue_date = {April 2019},
	volume = {182},
	number = {47},
	month = {Apr},
	year = {2019},
	issn = {0975-8887},
	pages = {15-19},
	numpages = {5},
	url = {http://www.ijcaonline.org/archives/volume182/number47/30508-2019918703},
	doi = {10.5120/ijca2019918703},
	publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
	address = {New York, USA}
}

Abstract

The computer networks are increasingly imposed recently, all sectors currently rely on the protocol Internet Protocol to provide users with remote access, wherever and whenever. IP is currently involved in sensitive areas such as telemedicine, remote sensing, telepresence, electronic payment and so on. IP exists in two version version 4 (IPv4) and version 6 (IPv6), the difference between these two protocols is distinguished in terms of features, operation, and performance. In this article we will measure and evaluate the performance of the two IPv4 and IPv6 protocols in the networks of communicating companies. The study will be performed by varying the routing protocols RIP, RIPnG, OSPF, OSPFv3, IS-IS and IS-IS v6. Our study will be conducted under the OPNET Modeler simulators, the traffic we will exploit for evaluation is VoIP, videoconferencing, and FTP.

References

  1. Khiat, A., Bahnasse, A., Bakkoury, J., El Khaili, M., & Louhab, F. E. (2019). New approach based internet of things for a clean atmosphere. International Journal of Information Technology, 11(1), 89-95.
  2. Bahnasse, A., Talea, M., Louhab, F. E., Laafar, S., Harbi, A., & Khiat, A. (2017, July). SAS-IMS for smart mobile security in IP multimedia subsystem. In Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Smart Digital Environment (pp. 35-41). ACM.
  3. Tsirtsis, G., & Srisuresh, P. (2000). Network address translation-protocol translation (NAT-PT) (No. RFC 2766).
  4. Chown, T., Loughney, J., & Winters, T. (2019). IPv6 Node Requirements (No. RFC 8504).
  5. Borman, D., Deering, S., & Hinden, R. (1999). IPv6 Jumbograms (No. RFC 2675).
  6. Bahnasse, A., & El Kamoun, N. (2015). Study and Analysis of a Dynamic Routing Protocols' Scalability over a Dynamic Multi-point Virtual Private Network. International Journal of Computer Applications, 123(2).
  7. Bensalah, F., El Kamoun, N., & Bahnasse, A. (2017). Evaluation of tunnel layer impact on VOIP performances (IP-MPLS-MPLS VPN-MPLS VPN IPsec). International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security (IJCSNS), 17(3), 87.
  8. Bensalah, F., El Kamoun, N., & Bahnasse, A. (2017). Analytical performance and evaluation of the scalability of layer 3 tunneling protocols: case of voice traffic over IP. IJCNS International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security, 17(4), 361-369.
  9. Hedrick, C. L. (1988). Routing information protocol (No. RFC 1058).
  10. Malkin, G., & Minnear, R. (1996). Ripng for ipv6 (No. RFC 2080).
  11. Khiat, A., Bahnasse, A., Bakkoury, J., & El Khaili, M. (2017). Study, evaluation and measurement of IEEE 802.16 e secured by dynamic and multipoint VPN IPsec. International Journal of Computer Science and Information Security, 15(1), 276.
  12. Moy, J., "OSPF Version 2", RFC 2178, DOI 10.17487/RFC2178, July 1997, .
  13. Al-Ani, D. R., & Al-Ani, A. R. (2018). The performance of IPv4 and IPv6 in terms of Routing Protocols using GNS 3 Simulator. Procedia computer science, 130(C), 1051-1056.
  14. Mohamed, H. H. A. (2018). QoS Measurement for Real-Time Voice Traffic Over IPv4 and IPv6 (Doctoral dissertation, Sudan University of Science and Technology).
  15. Samaan, S. S. (2018). Performance Evaluation of RIPng, EIGRPv6 and OSPFv3 for Real Time Applications. Journal of Engineering, 24(1), 111-122

Keywords

IPv6, IP Next Generation, IPv4, IPng, IETF, SIP